Dataset Information

Standardized Approach for ROI-Based Measurements of Proton Density Fat Fraction and R2* in the Liver.

ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE:The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reproducibility (interreviewer agreement) and repeatability (intrareviewer agreement) of ROI sampling strategies to measure chemical shift-encoded (CSE) MRI-based liver proton density fat fraction (PDFF) and R2* (1 / T2*). A secondary purpose was to standardize ROI-based liver PDFF and R2* measurements by providing a compromise between measurement reproducibility and repeatability and time burden for image analysts. MATERIALS AND METHODS:CSE data from two cohorts were retrospectively analyzed. Cohort A included 53 patients referred for abdominal MRI and healthy subjects recruited for a comparison study of CT and MRI. Cohort B included 37 patients with suspected liver iron overload. Three reviewers measured liver PDFF and R2* using previously reported ROI sampling strategies. Inter- and intrareviewer agreement of liver PDFF and R2* were evaluated using Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS:Averaging largest-fit ROIs over the nine Couinaud segments resulted in the narrowest limits of agreement (LOA) for liver PDFF and R2* measurements in both cohorts. For PDFF, interreviewer agreement had mean LOA of ± 0.8% for cohort A and ± 1.7% for cohort B. Intrareviewer agreement was ± 0.5% for cohort A and ± 0.9% for cohort B. For R2* interre-viewer agreement had mean LOA of ± 3.0 s-1 for cohort A and ± 17.9 s-1 for cohort B. Intrare-viewer agreement was ± 2.6 s-1 for cohort A and ± 14.6 s-1 for cohort B. This approach was the most time-burdensome, requiring a mean ± SD of 149.7 ± 8.6 s per dataset. CONCLUSION:For improved reproducibility and repeatability of liver PDFF and R2* measurements, clinicians and researchers should sample as much area of the liver as possible using multiple large ROIs.

SUBMITTER: Campo CA

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5639884 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Standardized Approach for ROI-Based Measurements of Proton Density Fat Fraction and R2* in the Liver.

Campo Camilo A CA Hernando Diego D Schubert Tilman T Bookwalter Candice A CA Pay Andrew J Van AJV Reeder Scott B SB

AJR. American journal of roentgenology 20170713 3

<h4>Objective</h4>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reproducibility (interreviewer agreement) and repeatability (intrareviewer agreement) of ROI sampling strategies to measure chemical shift-encoded (CSE) MRI-based liver proton density fat fraction (PDFF) and R2* (1 / T2*). A secondary purpose was to standardize ROI-based liver PDFF and R2* measurements by providing a compromise between measurement reproducibility and repeatability and time burden for image analysts.<h4>Materials and ...[more]

PMID: 28705058

Similar Datasets

Project description:Purpose To determine the linearity, bias, and precision of hepatic proton density fat fraction (PDFF) measurements by using magnetic resonance (MR) imaging across different field strengths, imager manufacturers, and reconstruction methods. Materials and Methods This meta-analysis was performed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A systematic literature search identified studies that evaluated the linearity and/or bias of hepatic PDFF measurements by using MR imaging (hereafter, MR imaging-PDFF) against PDFF measurements by using colocalized MR spectroscopy (hereafter, MR spectroscopy-PDFF) or the precision of MR imaging-PDFF. The quality of each study was evaluated by using the Quality Assessment of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy 2 tool. De-identified original data sets from the selected studies were pooled. Linearity was evaluated by using linear regression between MR imaging-PDFF and MR spectroscopy-PDFF measurements. Bias, defined as the mean difference between MR imaging-PDFF and MR spectroscopy-PDFF measurements, was evaluated by using Bland-Altman analysis. Precision, defined as the agreement between repeated MR imaging-PDFF measurements, was evaluated by using a linear mixed-effects model, with field strength, imager manufacturer, reconstruction method, and region of interest as random effects. Results Twenty-three studies (1679 participants) were selected for linearity and bias analyses and 11 studies (425 participants) were selected for precision analyses. MR imaging-PDFF was linear with MR spectroscopy-PDFF (R2 = 0.96). Regression slope (0.97; P < .001) and mean Bland-Altman bias (-0.13%; 95% limits of agreement: -3.95%, 3.40%) indicated minimal underestimation by using MR imaging-PDFF. MR imaging-PDFF was precise at the region-of-interest level, with repeatability and reproducibility coefficients of 2.99% and 4.12%, respectively. Field strength, imager manufacturer, and reconstruction method each had minimal effects on reproducibility. Conclusion MR imaging-PDFF has excellent linearity, bias, and precision across different field strengths, imager manufacturers, and reconstruction methods. © RSNA, 2017 Online supplemental material is available for this article. An earlier incorrect version of this article appeared online. This article was corrected on October 2, 2017.

Project description:BackgroundWhole-organ, noninvasive techniques for the detection and quantification of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease features have clinical and research applications. However, the effect of time of day, hydration status, and meals are unknown factors with potential to impact bias, precision, reproducibility, and repeatability of chemical shift-encoded MRI (CSE-MRI) to quantify liver proton density fat fraction (PDFF).PurposeTo assess the effect of diurnal variation on PDFF using CSE-MRI, including the effect of time of day, the effect of meals and hydration status, as well as the day to day variability.Study typeProspective.SubjectsEleven healthy subjects and nine patients with observed hepatic steatosis.Field strength/sequencesA commercial quantitative confounder-corrected CSE-MRI sequence (IDEAL IQ) and an MR spectroscopy (MRS) sequence (multiecho STEAM) were acquired at 1.5T.AssessmentMRI-PDFF and MRS-PDFF estimates were compared across six visits (before and after a controlled breakfast, before and after an uncontrolled lunch, at approximately 4 pm, and then before breakfast on the following day) with three repeated measures for a total of 360 MRI-PDFF and MRS-PDFF measurements.Statistical testsLinear regression, Bland-Altman analysis, and mixed effect models were used to determine the bias, precision, and repeatability of PDFF measurements.ResultsNo statistically significant linear trend was observed across visits for either MRI-PDFF or MRS-PDFF (P = 0.31 and 0.37, respectively). The repeatability was measured to be 0.86% for MRI-PDFF and 1.1% for MRS-PDFF over all six visits. For MRI-PDFF, the variability between all six visits (0.94%) was only slightly higher than within each visit (0.66%), with P < 0.001. For MRS-PDFF, the variability between all six visits was 1.29%, compared with 0.87% within each visit (P < 0.001).Data conclusionOur results may indicate that it is not necessary to control for the time of day or the fasting/fed state of the patient when measuring PDFF using CSE-MRI.Level of evidence2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;51:407-414.

Project description:Background & aimsPatients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) or nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) often require histologic assessment via liver biopsy. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based methods for measuring liver triglycerides based on proton density fat fraction (PDFF) are increasingly used as a noninvasive tool to identify patients with hepatic steatosis and to assess for change in liver fat over time. We aimed to determine whether MRI-PDFF accurately reflects a variety of liver histology features in patients with NAFLD or NASH.MethodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of pooled data from 3 phase 2a trials of pharmacotherapies for NAFLD or NASH. We collected baseline clinical, laboratory, and histopathology data on all subjects who had undergone MRI analysis in 1 of the trials. We assessed the relationship between liver PDFF values and liver histologic findings using correlation and area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) analyses. As an ancillary analysis, we also simulated a clinical trial selection process and calculated subject exclusion rates and differences in population characteristics caused by PDFF inclusion thresholds of 6% to 15%.ResultsIn 370 subjects, the mean baseline PDFF was 17.4% ± 8.6%. Baseline PDFF values correlated with several histopathology parameters, including steatosis grade (r = 0.78; P < .001), NAFLD activity score (NAS, r = 0.54; P < .001), and fibrosis stage (r = -0.59; P < .001). However, PDFF did not accurately identify patients with NAS ≥ 4 (AUROC = 0.72) or fibrosis stage ≥3 (AUROC = 0.66). In a theoretical trial of these subjects, exclusion rates increased as PDFF minimum threshold level increased. There were no significant differences in cohort demographics when PDFF thresholds ranging from 6% to 15% were used, and differences in laboratory and histopathology data were small.ConclusionsIn an analysis of patients with NAFLD or NASH, we determined that although The MRI-PDFF correlated with steatosis grade and NAS, and inversely with fibrosis stage, it was suboptimal in identification of patients with NAS >4 or advanced fibrosis. Although MRI-PDFF is an important imaging biomarker for continued evaluation of this patient population, liver biopsy analysis is still necessary.

Dataset Information

Standardized Approach for ROI-Based Measurements of Proton Density Fat Fraction and R2* in the Liver.

Publications

Standardized Approach for ROI-Based Measurements of Proton Density Fat Fraction and R2* in the Liver.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets