Dataset Information

Laboratory Workflow Analysis of Culture of Periprosthetic Tissues in Blood Culture Bottles.

ABSTRACT: Culture of periprosthetic tissue specimens in blood culture bottles is more sensitive than conventional techniques, but the impact on laboratory workflow has yet to be addressed. Herein, we examined the impact of culture of periprosthetic tissues in blood culture bottles on laboratory workflow and cost. The workflow was process mapped, decision tree models were constructed using probabilities of positive and negative cultures drawn from our published study (T. N. Peel, B. L. Dylla, J. G. Hughes, D. T. Lynch, K. E. Greenwood-Quaintance, A. C. Cheng, J. N. Mandrekar, and R. Patel, mBio 7:e01776-15, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.01776-15), and the processing times and resource costs from the laboratory staff time viewpoint were used to compare periprosthetic tissues culture processes using conventional techniques with culture in blood culture bottles. Sensitivity analysis was performed using various rates of positive cultures. Annualized labor savings were estimated based on salary costs from the U.S. Labor Bureau for Laboratory staff. The model demonstrated a 60.1% reduction in mean total staff time with the adoption of tissue inoculation into blood culture bottles compared to conventional techniques (mean ± standard deviation, 30.7 ± 27.6 versus 77.0 ± 35.3 h per month, respectively; P < 0.001). The estimated annualized labor cost savings of culture using blood culture bottles was $10,876.83 (±$337.16). Sensitivity analysis was performed using various rates of culture positivity (5 to 50%). Culture in blood culture bottles was cost-effective, based on the estimated labor cost savings of $2,132.71 for each percent increase in test accuracy. In conclusion, culture of periprosthetic tissue in blood culture bottles is not only more accurate than but is also cost-saving compared to conventional culture methods.

SUBMITTER: Peel TN

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5648717 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Laboratory Workflow Analysis of Culture of Periprosthetic Tissues in Blood Culture Bottles.

Peel Trisha N TN Sedarski John A JA Dylla Brenda L BL Shannon Samantha K SK Amirahmadi Fazlollaah F Hughes John G JG Cheng Allen C AC Patel Robin R

Journal of clinical microbiology 20170712 9

Culture of periprosthetic tissue specimens in blood culture bottles is more sensitive than conventional techniques, but the impact on laboratory workflow has yet to be addressed. Herein, we examined the impact of culture of periprosthetic tissues in blood culture bottles on laboratory workflow and cost. The workflow was process mapped, decision tree models were constructed using probabilities of positive and negative cultures drawn from our published study (T. N. Peel, B. L. Dylla, J. G. Hughes, ...[more]

PMID: 28701418

Similar Datasets

Project description:UNLABELLED:Despite known low sensitivity, culture of periprosthetic tissue specimens on agars and in broths is routine. Culture of periprosthetic tissue samples in blood culture bottles (BCBs) is potentially more convenient, but it has been evaluated in a limited way and has not been widely adopted. The aim of this study was to compare the sensitivity and specificity of inoculation of periprosthetic tissue specimens into blood culture bottles with standard agar and thioglycolate broth culture, applying Bayesian latent class modeling (LCM) in addition to applying the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) criteria for prosthetic joint infection. This prospective cohort study was conducted over a 9-month period (August 2013 to April 2014) at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, and included all consecutive patients undergoing revision arthroplasty. Overall, 369 subjects were studied; 117 (32%) met IDSA criteria for prosthetic joint infection, and 82% had late chronic infection. Applying LCM, inoculation of tissues into BCBs was associated with a 47% improvement in sensitivity compared to the sensitivity of conventional agar and broth cultures (92.1 versus 62.6%, respectively); this magnitude of change was similar when IDSA criteria were applied (60.7 versus 44.4%, respectively; P = 0.003). The time to microorganism detection was shorter with BCBs than with standard media (P < 0.0001), with aerobic and anaerobic BCBs yielding positive results within a median of 21 and 23 h, respectively. Results of our study demonstrate that the semiautomated method of periprosthetic tissue culture in blood culture bottles is more sensitive than and as specific as agar and thioglycolate broth cultures and yields results faster. IMPORTANCE:Prosthetic joint infections are a devastating complication of arthroplasty surgery. Despite this, current microbiological techniques to detect and diagnose infections are imperfect. This study examined a new approach to diagnosing infections, through the inoculation of tissue samples from around the prosthetic joint into blood culture bottles. This study demonstrated that, compared to current laboratory practices, this new technique increased the detection of infection. These findings are important for patient care to allow timely and accurate diagnosis of infection.

Project description:BACKGROUND:The aim of this prospective study was to use direct matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) to rapidly diagnose periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs). METHOD:Synovial fluid was taken from 77 patients (80 joints, 41 hips and 39 knees) who met the International Consensus Meeting criteria for PJI, and inoculated into blood culture bottles (BCBs) and onto conventional swabs. Positive blood cultures were analyzed using either direct or routine MALDI-TOF MS. Pathogen identification and the time to identification was recorded. Differences between groups were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test and Bonferroni's post-hoc test. RESULTS:Direct and routine MALDI-TOF MS both detected 64 positive results (80%), compared to 47 (59%) by conventional swabs (p = 0.002). Direct MALDI-TOF MS identified 85.3% of the gram-positive organisms and 92.3% of the gram-negative organisms. No fungi were identified by direct MALDI-TOF MS. In 17 BCBs that were flagged positive, identification by direct MALDI-TOF MS failed. Among the positive results in the direct MALDI-TOF MS group, Staphylococcus aureus accounted for 47%, followed by Staphylococcus epidermidis (17%), Escherichia coli (9%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (9%). The median time to microorganism identification was significantly shorter with direct MALDI-TOF MS (12.7 h, IQR: 8.9-19.6 h) than with routine MALDI-TOF MS (39.5 h, IQR: 22.8-46.0 h) or swabs (44.4 h, IQR: 27.2-72.6 h) (p < 0.0001). In pairwise comparisons, there were significant differences in the time of microorganism identification between direct MALDI-TOF MS and routine MALDI-TOF MS (p < 0.0001) or swab culture (p < 0.0001). There was no significant difference between routine MALDI-TOF MS and swab culture (p = 0.0268). CONCLUSION:Compared with current laboratory practice, direct MALDI-TOF MS shortened the time to microorganism identification and had superior results compared to conventional swabs, except for fungi. Further studies should investigate whether the earlier administration of appropriate antimicrobial agents can improve the treatment outcomes of PJIs.

Dataset Information

Laboratory Workflow Analysis of Culture of Periprosthetic Tissues in Blood Culture Bottles.

Publications

Laboratory Workflow Analysis of Culture of Periprosthetic Tissues in Blood Culture Bottles.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets