Dataset Information

Survival Patterns of 5750 Stereotactic Radiosurgery-Treated Patients with Brain Metastasis as a Function of the Number of Lesions.

ABSTRACT: The number of brain metastases (BMs) plays an important role in the decision between stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and whole-brain radiation therapy.We analyzed the survival of 5750 SRS-treated patients with BM as a function of BM number. Survival analyses were performed with Kaplan-Meier analysis as well as univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models.Patients with BMs were first categorized as those with 1, 2-4, and 5-10 BMs based on the scheme proposed by Yamamoto et al. (Lancet Oncology 2014). Median overall survival for patients with 1 BM was superior to those with 2-4 BMs (7.1 months vs. 6.4 months, P = 0.009), and survival of patients with 2-4 BMs did not differ from those with 5-10 BMs (6.4 months vs. 6.3 months, P = 0.170). The median survival of patients with >10 BMs was lower than those with 2-10 BMs (6.3 months vs. 5.5 months, P = 0.025). In a multivariate model that accounted for age, Karnofsky Performance Score, systemic disease status, tumor histology, and cumulative intracranial tumor volume, we observed a ?10% increase in hazard of death when comparing patients with 1 versus 2-10 BMs (P < 0.001) or 10 versus >10 BMs (P < 0.001). When BM number was modeled as a continuous variable rather than using the classification by Yamamoto et al., we observed a step-wise 4% increase in the hazard of death for every increment of 6-7 BM (P < 0.001).The contribution of BM number to overall survival is modest and should be considered as one of the many variables considered in the decision between SRS and whole-brain radiation therapy.

SUBMITTER: Ali MA

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5654648 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Survival Patterns of 5750 Stereotactic Radiosurgery-Treated Patients with Brain Metastasis as a Function of the Number of Lesions.

Ali Mir Amaan MA Hirshman Brian R BR Wilson Bayard B Carroll Kate T KT Proudfoot James A JA Goetsch Steven J SJ Alksne John F JF Ott Kenneth K Aiyama Hitoshi H Nagano Osamu O Carter Bob S BS Fogarty Gerald G Hong Angela A Serizawa Toru T Yamamoto Masaaki M Chen Clark C CC

World neurosurgery 20170719

<h4>Background</h4>The number of brain metastases (BMs) plays an important role in the decision between stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and whole-brain radiation therapy.<h4>Methods</h4>We analyzed the survival of 5750 SRS-treated patients with BM as a function of BM number. Survival analyses were performed with Kaplan-Meier analysis as well as univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models.<h4>Results</h4>Patients with BMs were first categorized as those with 1, 2-4, and 5-10 BMs b ...[more]

PMID: 28735121

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeHypofractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (HF-SRS) with or without surgical resection is potentially a preferred treatment for larger or symptomatic brain metastases (BMs). Herein, we report clinical outcomes and predictive factors following HF-SRS.Methods and materialsPatients undergoing HF-SRS for intact (iHF-SRS) or resected (rHF-SRS) BMs from 2008 to 2018 were retrospectively identified. Linear accelerator-based image-guided HF-SRS consisted of 5 fractions at 5, 5.5, or 6 Gy per fraction. Time to local progression (LP), time to distant brain progression (DBP), and overall survival (OS) were calculated. Cox models assessed effect of clinical factors on OS. Fine and Gray's cumulative incidence model for competing events examined effect of factors on LP and DBP. The occurrence of leptomeningeal disease (LMD) was determined. Logistic regression examined predictors of LMD.ResultsAmong 445 patients, median age was 63.5 years; 87% had Karnofsky performance status ≥70. Fifty-three % of patients underwent surgical resection, and 75% received 5 Gy per fraction. Patients with resected BMs had higher Karnofsky performance status (90-100, 41 vs 30%), less extracranial disease (absent, 25 vs 13%), and fewer BMs (multiple, 32 vs 67%). Median diameter of the dominant BM was 3.0 cm (interquartile range, 1.8-3.6 cm) for intact BMs and 4.6 cm (interquartile range, 3.9-5.5 cm) for resected BMs. Median OS was 5.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.3-6.0) following iHF-SRS and 12.8 months (95% CI, 10.8-16.2) following rHF-SRS (P < .01). Cumulative LP incidence was 14.5% at 18 months (95% CI, 11.4-18.0%), significantly associated with greater total GTV (hazard ratio, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.05-1.20) following iFR-SRS, and with recurrent versus newly diagnosed BMs across all patients (hazard ratio, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.01-5.15). Cumulative DBP incidence was significantly greater following rHF-SRS than iHF-SRS (P = .01), with respective 24-month rates of 50.0 (95% CI, 43.3-56.3) and 35.7% (95% CI, 29.2-42.2). LMD (57 events total; 33% nodular, 67% diffuse) was observed in 17.1% of rHF-SRS and 8.1% of iHF-SRS cases (odds ratio, 2.46; 95% CI, 1.34-4.53). Any radionecrosis and grade 2+ radionecrosis events were observed in 14 and 8% of cases, respectively.ConclusionsHF-SRS demonstrated favorable rates of LC and radionecrosis in postoperative and intact settings. Corresponding LMD and RN rates were comparable to those of other studies.

Project description:Background:Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has emerged as an important modality for the treatment of intracranial metastases. There are currently few established guidelines delineating indications for SRS use and fewer still regarding plan evaluation in the treatment of multiple brain metastases. Methods:An 18 question electronic survey was distributed to radiation oncologists at National Cancer Institute (NCI) designated cancer centers in the USA (60). Centers without radiation oncologists were excluded. Physicians who indicated that they do not prescribe SRS were excluded from the remaining survey questions. Sign test and Chi-square test were used to determine if responses differed significantly from random distribution. Results:One hundred sixteen of the 697 radiation oncologists surveyed completed the questionnaire, representing 51 institutions. Sixty-two percent reported treating patients with brain metastases using SRS. Radiation oncologists prescribing SRS most commonly treat CNS (66.2%) and lung (49.3%) malignancies. SRS was used more frequently for < 10 brain metastases (73.7%; p < 0.0001) and whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) for > 10 brain metastases (82.5%; p < 0.0001). The maximum number of lesions physicians were willing to treat with SRS without WBRT was 1-4 (40.4%) and 5-10 (42.4%) (p < 0.0001 compared to 11-15, 16-20 and no limit). The most important criteria for choosing SRS or WBRT were number of lesions (p < 0.0001) and performance status (p = 0.016). The most common margin for SRS was 0 mm (49.1%; p = 0.0021). The most common dose constraints other than critical structure was conformity index (84.2%) and brain V12 (61.4%). The LINAC was the most common treatment modality (54.4%) and mono-isocenter technique for multiple brain metastases was commonly used (43.9%; p = 0.23). Most departments do not have a policy for brain metastases treatment (64.9%; p = 0.024). Conclusions:This is one of the first national surveys assessing the use of SRS for brain metastases in clinical practice. These data highlight some clinical considerations for physicians treating brain metastases with SRS.

Project description:BackgroundStereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a frequently chosen treatment for patients with brain metastases and the number of long-term survivors is increasing. Brain necrosis (e.g. radionecrosis) is the most important long-term side effect of the treatment. Retrospective studies show a lower risk of radionecrosis and local tumor recurrence after fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (fSRS, e.g. five fractions) compared with stereotactic radiosurgery in one or three fractions. This is especially true for patients with large brain metastases. As such, the 2022 ASTRO guideline of radiotherapy for brain metastases recommends more research to fSRS to reduce the risk of radionecrosis. This multicenter prospective randomized study aims to determine whether the incidence of adverse local events (either local failure or radionecrosis) can be reduced using fSRS versus SRS in one or three fractions in patients with brain metastases.MethodsPatients are eligible with one or more brain metastases from a solid primary tumor, age of 18 years or older, and a Karnofsky Performance Status ≥ 70. Exclusion criteria include patients with small cell lung cancer, germinoma or lymphoma, leptomeningeal metastases, a contraindication for MRI, prior inclusion in this study, prior surgery for brain metastases, prior radiotherapy for the same brain metastases (in-field re-irradiation). Participants will be randomized between SRS with a dose of 15-24 Gy in 1 or 3 fractions (standard arm) or fSRS 35 Gy in five fractions (experimental arm). The primary endpoint is the incidence of a local adverse event (local tumor failure or radionecrosis identified on MRI scans) at two years after treatment. Secondary endpoints are salvage treatment and the use of corticosteroids, bevacizumab, or antiepileptic drugs, survival, distant brain recurrences, toxicity, and quality of life.DiscussionCurrently, limiting the risk of adverse events such as radionecrosis is a major challenge in the treatment of brain metastases. fSRS potentially reduces this risk of radionecrosis and local tumor failure.Trial registrationClincalTrials.gov, trial registration number: NCT05346367 , trial registration date: 26 April 2022.

Dataset Information

Survival Patterns of 5750 Stereotactic Radiosurgery-Treated Patients with Brain Metastasis as a Function of the Number of Lesions.

Publications

Survival Patterns of 5750 Stereotactic Radiosurgery-Treated Patients with Brain Metastasis as a Function of the Number of Lesions.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets