Functional antagonism of ?-arrestin isoforms balance IGF-1R expression and signalling with distinct cancer-related biological outcomes.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: With very similar 3D structures, the widely expressed ?-arrestin isoforms 1 and 2 play at times identical, distinct or even opposing roles in regulating various aspects of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) expression and signalling. Recent evidence recognizes the ?-arrestin system as a key regulator of not only GPCRs, but also receptor tyrosine kinases, including the highly cancer relevant insulin-like growth factor type 1 receptor (IGF-1R). Binding of ?-arrestin1 to IGF-1R leads to ligand-dependent degradation of the receptor and generates additional MAPK/ERK signalling, protecting cancer cells against anti-IGF-1R therapy. Because the interplay between ?-arrestin isoforms governs the biological effects for most GPCRs, as yet unexplored for the IGF-1R, we sought to investigate specifically the regulatory roles of the ?-arrestin2 isoform on expression and function of the IGF-1R. Results from controlled expression of either ?-arrestin isoform demonstrate that ?-arrestin2 acts in an opposite manner to ?-arrestin1 by promoting degradation of an unstimulated IGF-1R, but protecting the receptor against agonist-induced degradation. Although both isoforms co-immunoprecipitate with IGF-1R, the ligand-occupied receptor has greater affinity for ?-arrestin1; this association lasts longer, sustains MAPK/ERK signalling and mitigates p53 activation. Conversely, ?-arrestin2 has greater affinity for the ligand-unoccupied receptor; this interaction is transient, triggers receptor ubiquitination and degradation without signalling activation, and leads to a lack of responsiveness to IGF-1, cell cycle arrest and decreased viability of cancer cells. This study reveals contrasting abilities of IGF-1R to interact with each ?-arrestin isoform, depending on the presence of the ligand and demonstrates the antagonism between the two ?-arrestin isoforms in controlling IGF-1R expression and function, which could be developed into a practical anti-IGF-1R strategy for cancer therapy.
SUBMITTER: Suleymanova N
PROVIDER: S-EPMC5658667 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Oct
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
ACCESS DATA