Dataset Information

A multidimensional view of racial differences in access to prostate cancer care.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:Racial disparities in prostate cancer treatment and outcomes are widespread and poorly understood. In the current study, the authors sought to determine whether access to care, measured across multiple dimensions, contributed to racial differences in prostate cancer. METHODS:The Philadelphia Area Prostate Cancer Access Study (P2 Access) included 2374 men diagnosed with localized prostate cancer between 2012 and 2014. Men were surveyed to assess their experiences accessing care (response rate of 51.1%). The authors determined appointment availability at 151 urology practices using simulated patient telephone calls and calculated travel distances using geospatial techniques. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to determine the association between 5 different domains of access (availability, accessibility, accommodation, affordability, and acceptability) and receipt of treatment, perceived quality of care, and physician-patient communication. RESULTS:There were 1907 non-Hispanic white and 394 black men in the study cohort. Overall, approximately 85% of the men received definitive treatment with no differences noted by race. Black men were less likely to report a high quality of care (69% vs 81%; P<.001) and good physician-patient communication (60% vs 71%; P<.001) compared with white men. In adjusted models, none of the 5 domains of access were found to be associated with definitive treatment overall or with radical prostatectomy. All access domains were associated with perceived quality of care and communication, although these domains did not mediate racial disparities. CONCLUSIONS:To the authors' knowledge, the current study presents the first comprehensive assessment of prostate cancer care access, treatment, and patient experience, demonstrating that although access was related to overall perceived quality of care and better physician-patient communication, it did not appear to explain observed racial differences. Cancer 2017;123:4449-57. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

SUBMITTER: Pollack CE

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5673580 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

A multidimensional view of racial differences in access to prostate cancer care.

Pollack Craig Evan CE Armstrong Katrina A KA Mitra Nandita N Chen Xinwei X Ward Katelyn R KR Radhakrishnan Archana A Wong Michelle S MS Bekelman Justin E JE Branas Charles C CC Rhodes Karin V KV Grande David T DT

Cancer 20170720 22

<h4>Background</h4>Racial disparities in prostate cancer treatment and outcomes are widespread and poorly understood. In the current study, the authors sought to determine whether access to care, measured across multiple dimensions, contributed to racial differences in prostate cancer.<h4>Methods</h4>The Philadelphia Area Prostate Cancer Access Study (P<sup>2</sup> Access) included 2374 men diagnosed with localized prostate cancer between 2012 and 2014. Men were surveyed to assess their experien ...[more]

PMID: 28727136

Similar Datasets

Project description:There is extensive evidence suggesting that black men with localized prostate cancer (PCa) have worse cancer-specific mortality compared with their non-Hispanic white counterparts.To evaluate racial disparities in the use, quality of care, and outcomes of radical prostatectomy (RP) in elderly men (? 65 years) with nonmetastatic PCa.This retrospective analysis of outcomes stratified according to race (black vs non-Hispanic white) included 2020 elderly black patients (7.6%) and 24,462 elderly non-Hispanic white patients (92.4%) with localized PCa who underwent RP within the first year of PCa diagnosis in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database between 1992 and 2009. The study was performed in 2014.Process of care (ie, time to treatment, lymph node dissection), as well as outcome measures (ie, complications, emergency department visits, readmissions, PCa-specific and all-cause mortality, costs) were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards regression. Multivariable conditional logistic regression and quantile regression were used to study the association of racial disparities with process of care and outcome measures.The proportion of black patients with localized prostate cancer who underwent RP within 90 days was 59.4% vs 69.5% of non-Hispanic white patients (P <? 001). In quantile regression of the top 50% of patients, blacks had a 7-day treatment delay compared with non-Hispanic whites. (P <? 001). Black patients were less likely to undergo lymph node dissection (odds ratio [OR], 0.76 [95% CI, 0.66-0.80]; P < .001) but had higher odds of postoperative visits to the emergency department (within 30 days: OR, 1.48 [95% CI, 1.18-1.86]); after 30 days or more (OR, 1.45 [95% CI, 1.19-1.76]) and readmissions (within 30 days: OR, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.02-1.61]); ? 30 days (OR, 1.27 [95% CI, 1.07-1.51]) compared with non-Hispanic whites. The surgical treatment of black patients was associated with a higher incremental annual cost (the top 50% of blacks spent $1185.50 (95% CI , $804.85-1 $1566.10; P < .001) more than the top 50% of non-Hispanic whites). There was no difference in PCa-specific mortality (P = .16) or all-cause mortality (P = .64) between black and non-Hispanic white men.Blacks treated with RP for localized PCa are more likely to experience adverse events and incur higher costs compared with non-Hispanic white men; however, this does not translate into a difference in PCa-specific or all-cause mortality.

Project description:ImportanceWhile racial disparities in prostate cancer mortality are well documented, it is not well known how these disparities vary geographically within the US.ObjectiveTo characterize geographic variation in prostate cancer-specific mortality differences between black and white men.Design, setting, and participantsThis cohort study included data from 17 geographic registries within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2014. Inclusion criteria were men 18 years and older with biopsy-confirmed prostate cancer. Men missing data on key variables (ie, cancer stage, Gleason grade group, prostate-specific antigen level, and survival follow-up data) were excluded. Analysis was performed from September 5 to December 25, 2018.ExposurePatient SEER-designated race (ie, black, white, or other).Main outcomes and measuresFine and Gray competing-risks regression analyses were used to evaluate the difference in prostate-cancer specific mortality between black and white men. A stratified analysis by Gleason grade group was performed stratified as grade group 1 and grade groups 2 through 5.ResultsThe final cohort consisted of 229 771 men, including 178 204 white men (77.6%), 35 006 black men (15.2%), and 16 561 men of other or unknown race (7.2%). Mean (SD) age at diagnosis was 64.9 (8.8) years. There were 4773 prostate cancer deaths among white men and 1250 prostate cancer deaths among black men. Compared with white men, black men had a higher risk of mortality overall (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 1.39 [95% CI, 1.30-1.48]). In the stratified analysis, there were 4 registries in which black men had worse prostate cancer-specific survival in both Gleason grade group 1 (Atlanta, Georgia: AHR, 5.49 [95% CI, 2.03-14.87]; Greater Georgia: AHR, 1.88 [95% CI, 1.10-3.22]; Louisiana: AHR, 1.80 [95% CI, 1.06-3.07]; New Jersey: AHR, 2.60 [95% CI, 1.53-4.40]) and Gleason grade groups 2 through 5 (Atlanta: AHR, 1.88 [95% CI, 1.46-2.45]; Greater Georgia: AHR, 1.29 [95% CI, 1.07-1.56]; Louisiana: AHR, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.07-1.54]; New Jersey: AHR, 1.52 [95% CI, 1.24-1.87]), although the magnitude of survival difference was lower than for Gleason grade group 1 in each of these registries. The greatest race-based survival difference for men with Gleason grade group 1 disease was in the Atlanta registry.Conclusions and relevanceThese findings suggest that population-level differences in prostate cancer survival among black and white men were associated with a small set of geographic areas and with low-risk prostate cancer. Targeted interventions in these areas may help to mitigate prostate cancer care disparities at the national level.

Project description:PurposeThere are racial and ethnic differences in endometrial cancer incidence and mortality rates; compared with Non-Hispanic White women, Black women have a similar incidence rate for endometrial cancer, but their mortality is higher. Pacific Islander women may also have worse outcomes compared to their White counterparts. We assessed tumor characteristics and adjuvant therapy by racial and ethnic group among endometrial cancer patients treated within the Military Health System, an equal access healthcare organization.MethodsWe retrospectively identified women diagnosed with invasive endometrial cancer among US Department of Defense beneficiaries reported in the Automated Central Tumor Registry database (year of diagnosis: 2001-2018). We compared tumor characteristics and receipt of adjuvant therapy across racial and ethnic groups using Chi-square or Fisher tests. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for risk of all cause mortality were calculated using Cox proportional hazards regression models adjusting for age at diagnosis, adjuvant therapy, histology and stage.ResultsThe study included 2574 endometrial cancer patients [1729 Non-Hispanic White, 318 Asian, 286 Black, 140 Pacific Islander and 101 Hispanic women]. Among all cases, a higher proportion of Black patients had non-endometrioid histology (46.5% versus ≤ 29.3% in other groups, P < 0.01) and grade 3-4 tumors (40.1% versus ≤ 29.3% in other groups, P < 0.01). In multivariable Cox models, compared with Non-Hispanic White cases, Black endometrial cancer patients had a higher mortality risk (HR 1.43, 95% CI, 1.13-1.83). There was no difference in mortality risk for other racial and ethnic groups.ConclusionBlack patients with endometrial cancer presented with more aggressive tumor features and they had worse overall survival compared with patients in other racial and ethnic groups. Further study is needed to better direct preventive and therapeutic efforts in order to correct endometrial cancer disparities in the future.

Dataset Information

A multidimensional view of racial differences in access to prostate cancer care.

Publications

A multidimensional view of racial differences in access to prostate cancer care.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets