Dataset Information

Effects of Teriparatide, Denosumab, or Both on Spine Trabecular Microarchitecture in DATA-Switch: a Randomized Controlled Trial.

ABSTRACT: In postmenopausal women, 2?yr of combined teriparatide and denosumab increases bone mineral density more than either drug alone, and switching from either combination or teriparatide to denosumab for an additional 2?yr further increases bone mineral density. Conversely, switching from denosumab to teriparatide results in transient bone loss. The effects of these interventions on spine microarchitecture are unknown. In the DATA and DATA-Switch studies, 94 postmenopausal osteoporotic women were randomized to receive 24?mo of teriparatide (20?µg daily), denosumab (60?mg every 6?mo), or both. Then, women originally assigned to 24?mo of teriparatide received 24?mo of denosumab, whereas subjects originally randomized to 24?mo of denosumab received 24?mo of teriparatide. Subjects who received both drugs received an additional 24?mo of denosumab alone. Spine trabecular bone score (TBS, a gray-level textural assessment of bone microarchitecture) was measured blinded from treatment groups using images from 2-dimensional dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry spine scans at 0, 12, 24, 30, 36, and 48?mo in 65 women who had posterior-anterior spine dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry images suitable for TBS analysis. After 24?mo, TBS increased by 2.7?±?4.7% in the teriparatide group (p?=?0.009 vs baseline), by 1.8?±?5.0% in the denosumab group (p?=?0.118 vs baseline), and by 4.5?±?6.7% in the combination group (p?=?0.017 vs baseline), with no significant between-group differences. In the 6?mo after the treatments were switched (months 24-30), TBS continued to increase in the combination-to-denosumab and teriparatide-to-denosumab groups but decreased by -1.1?±?4.0% in the denosumab-to-teriparatide group (p?

SUBMITTER: Tsai JN

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5673584 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Oct - Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Effects of Teriparatide, Denosumab, or Both on Spine Trabecular Microarchitecture in DATA-Switch: a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Tsai Joy N JN Jiang Linda A LA Lee Hang H Hans Didier D Leder Benjamin Z BZ

Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry 20170616 4

In postmenopausal women, 2 yr of combined teriparatide and denosumab increases bone mineral density more than either drug alone, and switching from either combination or teriparatide to denosumab for an additional 2 yr further increases bone mineral density. Conversely, switching from denosumab to teriparatide results in transient bone loss. The effects of these interventions on spine microarchitecture are unknown. In the DATA and DATA-Switch studies, 94 postmenopausal osteoporotic women were ra ...[more]

PMID: 28624340

Similar Datasets

Project description:Combined teriparatide and denosumab increases spine and hip bone mineral density more than either drug alone. The effect of this combination on skeletal microstructure and microarchitecture, however, is unknown. Because skeletal microstructure and microarchitecture are important components of skeletal integrity, we performed high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) assessments at the distal tibia and radius in postmenopausal osteoporotic women randomized to receive teriparatide 20?µg daily (n?=?31), denosumab 60?mg every 6 months (n?=?33), or both (n?=?30) for 12 months. In the teriparatide group, total volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) did not change at either anatomic site but increased in both other groups at both sites. The increase in vBMD at the tibia was greater in the combination group (3.1?±?2.2%) than both the denosumab (2.2?±?1.9%) and teriparatide groups (-0.3?±?1.9%) (p?<?0.02 for both comparisons). Cortical vBMD decreased by 1.6?±?1.9% at the tibia and by 0.9?±?2.8% at the radius in the teriparatide group, whereas it increased in both other groups at both sites. Tibia cortical vBMD increased more in the combination group (1.5?±?1.5%) than both monotherapy groups (p?<?0.04 for both comparisons). Cortical thickness did not change in the teriparatide group but increased in both other groups. The increase in cortical thickness at the tibia was greater in the combination group (5.4?±?3.9%) than both monotherapy groups (p?<?0.01 for both comparisons). In the teriparatide group, radial cortical porosity increased by 20.9?±?37.6% and by 5.6?±?9.9% at the tibia but did not change in the other two groups. Bone stiffness and failure load, as estimated by finite element analysis, did not change in the teriparatide group but increased in the other two groups at both sites. Together, these findings suggest that the use of denosumab and teriparatide in combination improves HR-pQCT measures of bone quality more than either drug alone and may be of significant clinical benefit in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Project description:Current osteoporosis medications increase bone mineral density (BMD) modestly and reduce, but do not eliminate, fracture risk. Attempts to improve efficacy by administering anabolic agents and bisphosphonates concomitantly have been unsuccessful. Conversely, 12 months of concomitant denosumab and teriparatide therapy increases BMD more than either drug alone.The purpose of this study was to determine whether 24 months of combined denosumab and teriparatide will increase hip and spine BMD more than either individual agent.Preplanned continuation of the Denosumab and Teriparatide Administration (DATA) randomized controlled trial in which postmenopausal osteoporotic women received teriparatide (20 ?g daily), denosumab (60 mg every 6 months), or both medications for 24 months.Participants were 94 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.Lumbar spine, femoral neck, total hip, and distal radius BMD and serum markers of bone turnover were measured.At 24 months, lumbar spine BMD increased more in the combination group (12.9 ± 5.0%) than in either the teriparatide (9.5 ± 5.9%, P = .01) or denosumab (8.3 ± 3.4%, P = .008) groups. Femoral neck BMD also increased more in the combination group (6.8 ± 3.6%) than in either the teriparatide (2.8 ± 3.9%, P = .003) or denosumab (4.1 ± 3.8%, P = .008) groups. Similarly, total hip BMD increased more in the combination group (6.3 ± 2.6%) than in the teriparatide (2.0 ± 3.0%) or denosumab (3.2 ± 2.5%) groups (P < .001 for both). Although spine and hip BMD continued to increase in the second year in all groups, these year 2 increases did not differ among groups. Serum C-telopeptide and N-terminal propeptide of type 1 procollagen were equally suppressed in the denosumab and combination groups, whereas osteocalcin decreased more in the denosumab group than in the combination group, a difference that persisted, but lessened, in the second year of therapy.Two years of concomitant teriparatide and denosumab therapy increases BMD more than therapy with either medication alone and more than has been reported with any current therapy. The combination of these agents may prove to be an important treatment option in patients at high risk of fracture.

Project description:BackgroundIn the Denosumab and Teriparatide Administration (DATA) study, we showed that denosumab fully inhibits teriparatide-induced bone resorption while allowing for continued teriparatide-induced bone formation, resulting in larger increases in hip and spine bone mineral density (BMD) than with either drug alone. We aimed to assess whether administration of denosumab with high dose teriparatide would stimulate larger increases in bone mass than those observed in the DATA study.MethodsDATA-HD was an open-label, randomised, controlled phase 4 trial done at Massachusetts General Hospital. Eligible women were postmenopausal women (at least 36 months since last menses or since hysterectomy with a follicle-stimulating hormone concentration of ≥40 U/L) with osteoporosis. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive teriparatide 20 μg (standard dose) or 40 μg (high dose) daily via subcutaneous injection for 9 months. At 3 months, both groups were started on denosumab 60 mg every 6 months via subcutaneous injection for 12 months. Areal BMD (aBMD) was measured at 0, 3, 9, and 15 months. Treatment was given open label, but outcome assessors were masked. The primary endpoint was percentage change from baseline in spine areal BMD (aBMD) at 15 months. Women who completed at least one study visit after baseline were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. Safety was assessed in all randomly assigned participants. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02176382.FindingsBetween Oct 15, 2014, and June 10, 2016, 269 women were assessed for eligibility. 76 participants were randomly assigned to 20 μg teriparatide (n=39) or 40 μg teriparatide (n=37), of whom 69 completed at least one post-baseline visit. At 15 months, mean spine aBMD had increased to a significantly greater extent in the 40 μg group (17·5% [SD 6·0] increase) than the 20 μg group (9·5% [3·2]; difference 8·1%, 95% CI 5·5 to 10·6, p<0·0001). Mean femoral neck aBMD had also increased to a greater extent in the 40 μg group (6·8% [SD 4·1] increase) than the 20 μg group (4·3% [3·7]; difference 2·5%, 0·5 to 4·5, p=0·04), as did mean total hip aBMD (40 μg group, 6·1% [3·4] increase; 20 μg group, 3·9% [2·9] increase; difference 2·2%, 0·6 to 3·8, p<0·0001). 30 (77%) of 39 participants in the 20 μg group and 29 (78%) of 37 participants in the 40 μg group had an adverse event, and seven (18%) and two (5%) patients had serious adverse events. The most frequent adverse events were joint pain (15 [38%]), muscle cramp (15 [38%]), and fatigue (12 [31%]) in the 20 μg group group and fatigue (14 [38%]), nausea (16 [43%]), and joint pain (17 [46%]) in the 40 μg group. No deaths were reported.InterpretationCombined treatment with teriparatide 40 μg and denosumab increases spine and hip BMD more than standard combination therapy. This large and rapid increase in bone mass suggest that this high dose regimen might provide a method of restoring skeletal integrity in patients with osteoporosis.FundingNational Institutes of Health and the Dart Foundation.

Project description:In a phase 2 trial of 222 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis aged 55 to 85 years randomized to one of three different doses of abaloparatide-SC, subcutaneous teriparatide, or placebo for 24 weeks, abaloparatide-SC resulted in improvements in skeletal microarchitecture as measured by the trabecular bone score. INTRODUCTION:Subcutaneous abaloparatide (abaloparatide-SC) increases total hip and lumbar spine bone mineral density and reduces vertebral and non-vertebral fractures. In this study, we analyzed the extent to which abaloparatide-SC improves skeletal microarchitecture, assessed indirectly by trabecular bone score (TBS). METHODS:This is a post hoc analysis of a phase 2 trial of 222 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis aged 55 to 85 years randomized to abaloparatide-SC (20, 40, or 80 ?g), subcutaneous teriparatide (20 ?g), or placebo for 24 weeks. TBS was measured from lumbar spine dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) images in 138 women for whom the DXA device was TBS software compatible. Assessments were made at baseline, 12 and 24 weeks. Between-group differences were assessed by generalized estimating equations adjusted for relevant baseline characteristics, and a pre-determined least significant change analysis was performed. RESULTS:After 24 weeks, TBS increased significantly by 2.27, 3.14, and 4.21% versus baseline in participants on 20, 40, and 80 ?g abaloparatide-SC daily, respectively, and by 2.21% in those on teriparatide (p?<?0.05 for each). The TBS in the placebo group declined by 1.08%. The TBS increase in each treatment group was significantly higher than placebo at 24 weeks (p?<?0.0001 for each) after adjustment for age, BMI, and baseline TBS. A dose-response was observed at 24 weeks across the three doses of abaloparatide-SC and placebo (p?=?0.02). The increase in TBS in the abaloparatide-SC 80 ?g group was significantly greater than TPTD (p?<?0.03). CONCLUSIONS:These results are consistent with an effect of abaloparatide-SC to improve lumbar spine skeletal microarchitecture, as assessed by TBS.

Dataset Information

Effects of Teriparatide, Denosumab, or Both on Spine Trabecular Microarchitecture in DATA-Switch: a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Publications

Effects of Teriparatide, Denosumab, or Both on Spine Trabecular Microarchitecture in DATA-Switch: a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure