Dataset Information

Automated population-based planning for whole brain radiation therapy.

ABSTRACT: Treatment planning for whole-brain radiation treatment is technically a simple process, but in practice it takes valuable clinical time of repetitive and tedious tasks. This report presents a method that automatically segments the relevant target and normal tissues, and creates a treatment plan in only a few minutes after patient simulation. Segmentation of target and critical structures is performed automatically through morphological operations on the soft tissue and was validated by comparing with manual clinical segmentation using the Dice coefficient and Hausdorff distance. The treatment plan is generated by searching a database of previous cases for patients with similar anatomy. In this search, each database case is ranked in terms of similarity using a customized metric designed for sensitivity by including only geometrical changes that affect the dose distribution. The database case with the best match is automatically modified to replace relevant patient info and isocenter position while maintaining original beam and MLC settings. Fifteen patients with marginally acceptable treatment plans were used to validate the method. In each of these cases the anatomy was accurately segmented, but the beams and MLC settings led to a suboptimal treatment plan by either underdosing the brain or excessively irradiating critical normal tissues. For each case, the anatomy was automatically segmented with the proposed method, and the automated and anual segmentations were then compared. The mean Dice coefficient was 0.97, with a standard deviation of 0.008 for the brain, 0.85 ± 0.009 for the eyes, and 0.67 ± 0.11 for the lens. The mean Euclidian distance was 0.13 ± 0.13 mm for the brain, 0.27± 0.31 for the eye, and 2.34 ± 7.23 for the lens. Each case was then subsequently matched against a database of 70 validated treatment plans and the best matching plan (termed autoplanned), was compared retrospectively with the clinical plans in terms of brain coverage and maximum doses to critical structures. Maximum doses were reduced by a maximum of 8.37 Gy for the left eye (mean 2.08), 11.67 for the right eye (1.90) and, respectively, 25.44 (5.59) for the left lens and 24.40 (4.85) for the right lens. Time to generate the autoplan, including the segmentation, was 3-4min. Automated database- based matching is an alternative to classical treatment planning that improves quality while providing a cost-effective solution to planning through modifying previous validated plans to match a current patient's anatomy.

SUBMITTER: Schreibmann E

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5690177 | biostudies-literature | 2015 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Automated population-based planning for whole brain radiation therapy.

Schreibmann Eduard E Fox Tim T Curran Walter W Shu Hui-Kuo HK Crocker Ian I

Journal of applied clinical medical physics 20150908 5

Treatment planning for whole-brain radiation treatment is technically a simple process, but in practice it takes valuable clinical time of repetitive and tedious tasks. This report presents a method that automatically segments the relevant target and normal tissues, and creates a treatment plan in only a few minutes after patient simulation. Segmentation of target and critical structures is performed automatically through morphological operations on the soft tissue and was validated by comparing ...[more]

PMID: 26699292

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeTo develop and evaluate an automated whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) treatment planning pipeline with a deep learning-based auto-contouring and customizable landmark-based field aperture design.MethodsThe pipeline consisted of the following steps: (1) Auto-contour normal structures on computed tomography scans and digitally reconstructed radiographs using deep learning techniques, (2) locate the landmark structures using the beam's-eye-view, (3) generate field apertures based on eight different landmark rules addressing different clinical purposes and physician preferences. Two parallel approaches for generating field apertures were developed for quality control. The performance of the generated field shapes and dose distributions were compared with the original clinical plans. The clinical acceptability of the plans was assessed by five radiation oncologists from four hospitals.ResultsThe performance of the generated field apertures was evaluated by the Hausdorff distance (HD) and mean surface distance (MSD) from 182 patients' field apertures used in the clinic. The average HD and MSD for the generated field apertures were 16 ± 7 and 7 ± 3 mm for the first approach, respectively, and 17 ± 7 and 7 ± 3 mm, respectively, for the second approach. The differences regarding HD and MSD between the first and the second approaches were 1 ± 2 and 1 ± 3 mm, respectively. A clinical review of the field aperture design, conducted using 30 patients, achieved a 100% acceptance rate for both the first and second approaches, and the plan review achieved a 100% acceptance rate for the first approach and a 93% acceptance rate for the second approach. The average acceptance rate for meeting lens dosimetric recommendations was 80% (left lens) and 77% (right lens) for the first approach, and 70% (both left and right lenses) for the second approach, compared with 50% (left lens) and 53% (right lens) for the clinical plans.ConclusionThis study provided an automated pipeline with two field aperture generation approaches to automatically generate WBRT treatment plans. Both quantitative and qualitative evaluations demonstrated that our novel pipeline was comparable with the original clinical plans.

Project description:PurposeAdaptive stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for prostate cancer (PC) by the 1.5 T MR-linac currently requires online planning by an expert user. A fully automated and user-independent solution to adaptive planning (mCycle) of PC-SBRT was compared with user's plans for the 1.5 T MR-linac.Methods and materialsFifty adapted plans on daily magnetic resonance imaging scans for 10 patients with PC treated by 35 Gy (prescription dose [Dp]) in 5 fractions were reoptimized offline from scratch, both by an expert planner (manual) and by mCycle. Manual plans consisted of multicriterial optimization (MCO) of the fluence map plus manual tweaking in segmentation, whereas in mCycle plans, the objectives were sequentially optimized by MCO according to an a-priori assigned priority list. The main criteria for planning approval were a dose ≥95% of the Dp to at least 95% of the planning target volume (PTV), V33.2 (PTV) ≥ 95%, a dose less than the Dp to the hottest cubic centimeter (V35 ≤ 1 cm3) of rectum, bladder, penile bulb, and urethral planning risk volume (ie, urethra plus 3 mm isotropically), and V32 ≤ 5%, V28 ≤ 10%, and V18 ≤ 35% to the rectum. Such dose-volume metrics, plus some efficiency and deliverability metrics, were used for the comparison of mCycle versus manual plans.ResultsmCycle plans improved target dose coverage, with V33.2 (PTV) passing on average (±1 SD) from 95.7% (±1.0%) for manual plans to 97.5% (±1.3%) for mCycle plans (P < .001), and rectal dose sparing, with significantly reduced V32, V28, and V18 (P ≤ .004). Although at an equivalent number of segments, mCycle plans consumed moderately more monitor units (+17%) and delivery time (+9%) (P < .001), whereas they were generally faster (-19%) in terms of optimization times (P < .019). No significant differences were found for the passing rates of locally normalized γ (3 mm, 3%) (P = .059) and γ (2 mm, 2%) (P = .432) deliverability metrics.ConclusionsIn the offline setting, mCycle proved to be a trustable solution for automated planning of PC-SBRT on the 1.5 T MR-linac. mCycle integration in the online workflow will free the user from the challenging online-optimization task.

Project description:Radiation therapy (RT) plays a vital role in the treatment of brain cancers, but it frequently results in cognitive decline in the patients who receive it. Because the underlying mechanisms for this decline remain poorly understood, the brain is typically treated as a single, uniform volume when evaluating the toxic effects of RT plans. This ignorance represents a significant deficit in the field of radiation oncology, as the technology exists to manipulate dose distributions to spare regions of the brain, but there exists no body of knowledge regarding what is critical to spare. This deficit exists due to the numerous confounding factors that are frequently associated with radiotherapy, including the tumors themselves, other treatments such as surgery and chemotherapy, and dose gradients across the brain. Here, we present a case in which a 57-year-old male patient received a uniform dose of radiation across the whole brain, did not receive concurrent chemotherapy, had minimal surgical intervention and a small tumor burden, and received resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scans both before and after RT. To our knowledge, this is the first study on the effects of whole-brain radiotherapy on functional network organization, and this patient's treatment regimen represents a rare and non-replicable opportunity to isolate the effects of radiation on functional connectivity. We observed substantial changes in the subject's behavior and functional network organization over a 12-month timeframe. Interestingly, the homogenous radiation dose to the brain had a heterogeneous effect on cortical networks, and the functional networks most affected correspond with observed cognitive behavioral deficits. This novel study suggests that the cognitive decline that occurs after whole-brain radiation therapy may be network specific and related to the disruption of large-scale distributed functional systems, and it indicates that fMRI is a promising avenue of study for optimizing cognitive outcomes after RT.

Dataset Information

Automated population-based planning for whole brain radiation therapy.

Publications

Automated population-based planning for whole brain radiation therapy.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets