Dataset Information

ATIM-14. ALLIANCE A071101: A PHASE II RANDOMIZED TRIAL COMPARING THE EFFICACY OF HEAT SHOCK PROTEIN PEPTIDE COMPLEX-96 (HSPPC-96) VACCINE GIVEN WITH BEVACIZUMAB VERSUS BEVACIZUMAB ALONE IN THE TREATMENT OF SURGICALLY RESECTABLE RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA

ABSTRACT: Abstract BACKGROUND Heat shock protein vaccines can be used to stimulate anti-tumor immune responses. An autologous vaccine (HSPPC-96) generated from patient resected tumors has been previously studied in single arm phase I/II trials for newly diagnosed and recurrent GBM. Based on promising survival in these studies, a randomized, multi-centered phase II trial of HSPPC-96 for recurrent GBM compared to bevacizumab was undertaken (NCT01814813). METHODS Patients with 1st/2nd recurrence of resectable GBM were enrolled and underwent surgery with generation of HSPPC-96 from autologous tumors. Post-operative eligibility included a volumetric extent of resection ?90% (by central review) and sufficient tumor to generate a minimum of 4 vaccine doses. Patients were randomized (1:1:1) to receive HSPPC-96 vaccine followed by bevacizumab at subsequent progression vs. concurrent HSPPC-96 vaccine and bevacizumab vs. bevacizumab alone. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) aiming to detect a 36% reduction in HR with 85% power and alpha=0.1 for pooled HSPPC-96 groups vs. bevacizumab alone. Planned enrollment was 165 patients (n=55/arm). An interim analysis was pre-planned at 50% of events (65 deaths). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival and adverse events. RESULTS At final analysis, 90 patients were enrolled with a distribution of 29:30:31. The study was terminated for futility after the interim analysis. In the intention to treat population, OS for the HSPPC-96 treated groups was 7.5 vs. 10.7 months for bevacizumab alone (HR=2.06 [95% CI 1.18–3.60], p=0.008). Among patients treated per protocol (n=73), OS for HSPPC-96 patients was 8.6 vs. 12.3 months (HR=1.99 [95% CI 1.03–3.81], p=0.03). Trends were similar for progression-free survival between groups. HSPPC-96 toxicity was well tolerated with no attributable serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS The study failed to demonstrate a survival benefit for patients treated with HSPPC-96 alone or in combination with bevacizumab compared to bevacizumab alone. Correlative analyses are ongoing. SUPPORT: U10CA180882, U10CA180821, U10CA180868, U24CA196171.

SUBMITTER: Bloch O

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5693056 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundBlood-based biomarkers for early detection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) are urgently needed. Current biomarkers lack high sensitivity and specificity for population screening. The gold-standard biomarker, CA 19-9, also fails to demonstrate the predictive value necessary for early detection.MethodsTo validate a functional genomics-based plasma migration signature biomarker panel, plasma tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI), tenascin C (TNC-FN III-C), and CA 19-9 levels were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays in three early-stage PDAC plasma cohorts, including two independent blinded validation cohorts containing a total of 43 stage I, 163 stage II, 86 chronic pancreatitis, 31 acute biliary obstruction, and 108 controls. Logistic regression models developed classification rules combining TFPI and/or TNC-FN III-C with CA 19-9 for patient cases and control subjects, with or without adjustment for age and diabetes status. Model classification performance was evaluated and analyses repeated among subpopulations without diabetes and pancreatitis history. Two-sided P values were calculated using bootstrap method.ResultsThe TFPI/TNC-FN III-C/CA 19-9 panel improved CA 19-9 performance in all early-stage cohorts, including discriminating stage IA/IB/IIA, stage IIB, and all early-stage cancer from healthy controls. Statistical significance was reached for a number of subcohorts, including for all early-stage cancer vs healthy controls (cohort 1 AUC = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.86 to 0.96, P = .04; cohort 3 AUC = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.76 to 0.89, P = .045). Among subcohorts without diabetes and pancreatitis history, the panel approaches potential clinical utility for early detection to discriminate early-stage PDAC from healthy controls including an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.87 (95% CI = 0.77 to 0.95) for stage I/IIA, an AUC of 0.93 (95% CI = 0.87 to 0.98) for stage IIB, and a statistically significant AUC of 0.89 (95% CI = 0.82 to 0.95) for all early-stage cancer ( P = .03).ConclusionsTFPI/TNC-FN III-C migration signature adds statistically significantly to CA 19-9's predictive power to detect early-stage PDAC and may have clinical utility for early detection of surgically resectable PDAC, as well as for enhanced survival from this routinely lethal cancer.

Dataset Information

ATIM-14. ALLIANCE A071101: A PHASE II RANDOMIZED TRIAL COMPARING THE EFFICACY OF HEAT SHOCK PROTEIN PEPTIDE COMPLEX-96 (HSPPC-96) VACCINE GIVEN WITH BEVACIZUMAB VERSUS BEVACIZUMAB ALONE IN THE TREATMENT OF SURGICALLY RESECTABLE RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets