NCOG-08. NEUROCOGNITIVE FUNCTIONING IN EORTC BRAIN TUMOR GROUP RANDOMIZED PHASE II TAVAREC TRIAL (EORTC 26091, NCT01164189) ON TEMOZOLOMIDE WITH OR WITHOUT BEVACIZUMAB in 1p/19q INTACT RECURRENT GRADE II AND III GLIOMAS
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Abstract BACKGROUND EORTC study 26091 showed that addition of bevacizumab (BEV) to temozolomide (TMZ) does not improve overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS) in recurrent grade II and III 1p/19q intact gliomas; regardless of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutational status. This abstract reports the neurocognitive functioning (NCF) outcomes. METHODS NCF was evaluated before randomization and at every 12 weeks during treatment using Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (Free Recall, Delayed Recall, and Delayed Recognition), Trail Making Test (TMT A/B); and Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWA). RESULTS 148/155 patients had at least one NCF assessment. Compliance was 91.5% at baseline and dropped to 61.9% at week 60. Primary analysis (at 5% significance level) compared NCF at the last disease assessment before or at week 60 in patients who had at least one NCF assessment after baseline. Patients in the temozolomide+bevacizumab arm did not differ from patients in the temozolomide only arm. Except for Delayed Recognition, all NCF outcomes were positively associated with WHO performance status. TMT A (p=0.03), TMT B (p=0.006) and COWA (p<0.0001) were significantly worse in patients receiving steroids at study entry. Furthermore, delayed recognition was worse in patients with larger tumors (>26.5 vs <=26.5 mm; p=0.04). Memory performance was poorer in patients with tumors in the left hemisphere (Free Recall; p=0.0002), Delayed Recall; p<0.0001, Delayed Recognition; p=0.004). Except for Free Recall and Delayed Recognition, all other baseline raw scores were associated with OS in univariate analyses. In a multivariate Cox regression model, TMT B and tumor size were identified as independent OS prognostic factors while baseline WHO performance status and steroids use were not included. CONCLUSION At the group level patients in the temozolomide+bevacizumab arm do not differ from patients with temozolomide only, individual patients’ verbal memory capacity might negatively be affected by tumor volume and tumor location.
SUBMITTER: Klein M
PROVIDER: S-EPMC5693186 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Nov
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
ACCESS DATA