Dataset Information

Posterior "Double Cannular Sliding Technique" for Resection of Posterior Septum of the Knee Joint.

ABSTRACT: We introduce the posterior double cannular sliding technique, which is an easy, fast, safe, and reproducible method for posterior septum resection of the knee joint. Several posterior compartment procedures have been developed. Procedures with anterior-posterior approaches (transnotch approach) and posterior-posterior approaches have become possible for arthroscopic total synovectomy and loose body removal. For resection of the posterior septum with posterior-posterior approaches, several authors have used various methods. However, although previous studies reported posterior septum resection in the posterior portal, or perforation of the posterior septum by blind vision or transnotch approach, specific postperforation techniques to resect the posterior septum have not been reported. Furthermore, methods of posterior septum resection remain difficult to perform using posterior portal arthroscopy, with difficulties in the approach and in achieving reproducible outcomes. Thus, we introduce the posterior double cannular sliding technique, which is a reproducible method that uses 2 transparent cannulas and a switching stick under direct visualization control with a transnotch approach, thereby minimizing the risk of potential neurovascular or posterior cruciate ligament injury for all procedures in posterior septum resection.

SUBMITTER: Choi NY

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5709791 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundLowering the exit position of the tibial tunnel can improve the clinical efficacy of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction, however, there is no unified positioning standard. This study aimed to use novel soft tissue landmarks to create a low tunnel.MethodsA total of 14 human cadaveric knees and 12 patients with PCL injury were included in this study. Firstly, we observed the anatomical position between the PCL, posterior septum, and other tissue, and evaluated the relationship between the center of the low tibial tunnel (SP tunnel) and posterior septum and distal reflection of posterior capsule, and using computed tomography (CT) to evaluate distance between the center of the SP tunnel with bony landmarks. Then, evaluated the blood vessels content in the posterior septum with HE staining. Finally, observed the posterior septum and distal reflection of the posterior capsule under arthroscopy to explore the clinical feasibility of creating a low tibial tunnel, and assessed the risk of surgery by using ultrasound to detect the distance between the popliteal artery and the posterior edge of tibial plateau bone cortex.ResultsIn all 14 cadaveric specimens, the PCL tibial insertions were located completely within the posterior medial compartment of the knee. The distance between the center of the SP tunnel and the the articular surface of tibial plateau was 9.4 ± 0.4 mm. All SP tunnels retained an intact posterior wall, which was 1.6 ± 0.3 mm from the distal reflection of the posterior capsule. The distances between the center of the SP tunnel and the the articular surface of tibial plateau, the champagne glass drop-off were 9.2 ± 0.4 mm (ICC: 0.932, 95%CI 0.806-0.978) and 1.5 ± 0.2 mm (ICC:0.925, 95%CI 0.788-0.975) in CT image. Compared with the posterior capsule, the posterior septum contained more vascular structures. Last, all 12 patients successfully established low tibial tunnels under arthroscopy, and the distance between the posterior edge of tibial plateau bone cortex and the popliteal artery was 7.8 ± 0.3, 9.4 ± 0.4 and 7.4 ± 0.3 mm at 30°, 60° and 90° flexion angels after filling with water and supporting with shaver in posterior-medial compartment of knee joint.ConclusionsA modified low tibial tunnel could be established in the PCL anatomical footprint by using the posterior septum and posterior capsule as landmarks.

Project description:BackgroundPosterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty requires an intercondylar notch to accommodate the cam housing that articulates with the tibial post to create femoral rollback required for deep flexion. The volume of bone resected for the intercondylar notch varies with implant design, and newer designs may accommodate high flexion with less bone resection.Questions/purposesThis study aims to analyze the bone volume and density resected from the intercondylar notch for three posterior stabilized implants from a single company: a Posterior Stabilized (PS) system, a Hi-Flex system (HF), and a rounded new box-reamer (RB) system and to further assess whether the newer RB with a cylindrical cutting tool would preserve more native bone.Materials and methodsUsing a computer model, the PS, HF, and RB femoral components were digitally implanted into CT scans of 19 cadaver femurs. Nine cadavers were fit with a size 4 implant, six with size 3, and four with a size 2. The volume of intercondylar bone resected digitally for femoral preparation was measured. Bone density was measured by CT scans in Hounsfield units (HU). A paired t test was used to compare the mean volume of bone resected for each implant.ResultsFor the size 4 femurs, the newer RB design removed 8% less intercondylar bone than the PS design (7,832 ± 501 vs. 8,547 ± 377 mm(3), p < 0.001) and 28% less bone than the HF design (7,832 ± 501 vs. 10,897 ± 444 mm(3), p < 0.001). The average HU for size 4 femurs for RB design was 427 ± 72 (PS = 399 ± 69, p < 0.001; HF = 379 ± 66, p < 0.001). For the size 3 femurs, the RB design removed 12% less intercondylar bone than the PS (6,664 ± 786 vs. 7,516 ± 648 mm(3), p < 0.001) and 27% less bone than the HF (6,664 ± 786 vs. 9,078 ± 713 mm(3), p < 0.001). HU for size 3 femurs for the RB design was 452 ± 70 (PS = 422 ± 53, p < 0.1; HF = 410 ± 59, p < 0.01). For the size 2 femurs, the RB design removed 5% less intercondylar bone than the PS (5,730 ± 552 vs. 6,009 ± 472 mm(3), p < 0.01) and 22% less bone than the HF (5,730 ± 552 vs. 7,380 ± 532 mm(3), p < 0.001). HU for size 2 femurs for the RB design was 430 ± 48 (PS = 408 ± 55, p < 0.01; HF = 385 ± 56, p < 0.01).ConclusionsThe newer RB design removes less bone from the intercondylar notch than the classic PS and HF designs in all sizes tested. The bone-conserving cuts incorporated into this newer implant design appear to preserve native bone without compromising design objectives.

Dataset Information

Posterior "Double Cannular Sliding Technique" for Resection of Posterior Septum of the Knee Joint.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets