Dataset Information

Geometric and dosimetric uncertainties in intracranial stereotatctic treatments for multiple nonisocentric lesions.

ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of geometric uncertainties of patient position on treatments of multiple nonisocentric intracranial lesions. The average distance between lesions in patients with multiple targets was determined by a retrospective survey of patients with multiple lesions. Retrospective patient imaging data from fractionated stereotactic patients were used to calculate interfractional and intrafractional patient position uncertainty. Three different immobilization devices were included in the positioning study. The interfractional and intrafractional patient positioning error data were used to calculate the geometric offset of a lesion located at varying distances from the mechanical isocenter for treatments of multiple lesions with a single arc, assuming that no intrafractional position correction is employed during an arc rotation. Dosimetric effects were studied using two representative lesions of two sizes, 6 mm and 13 mm maximum dimensions, and prescribed to 20 Gy and 18 Gy, respectively. Distances between lesions ranged from < 10 mm to 150 mm, which would correspond to a range of isocenter to lesion separations of < 10 mm to 75 mm, assuming an isocenter located at the geometric mean. In the presence of a full six degree of freedom patient correction system, the effects of the intrafractional patient positioning uncertainties were less than 1.8 mm (3.6mm) for 1? (2?) deviations for lesion spacing up to 75 mm assuming a quadratic summation of 1? and 2?. Without the benefit of a six DOF correction device, only correcting for three translations, the effects of the intrafractional patient positioning uncertainties were within 3.1 mm (7.2 mm) for 1? (2?) deviations for distances up to 75 mm. 1? and 2? deviations along all six axes were observed in 3.6% and 0.3%, respectively, of 974 fractions analyzed. Dosimetric effects for 2 mm and 4 mm offsets were most significant for the small lesion with minimum dose (Dmin) decreasing from 20 Gy to 13.6 Gy and 5.7 Gy and volume receiving the prescription (V20Gy) reducing from 100% to 57% and 16%, respectively. The dosimetric effects on the larger lesion were less pronounced with Dmin reducing from 18 Gy to 17.5 Gy and 14.2 Gy, and V18Gy reducing from 100% to 98.3% and 85.4%, for 2 mm and 4 mm offsets, respectively. In the 1? scenario (3.6% of patients) angular uncertainties in patient positioning can introduce 1.0 mm shifts in the location of the lesion position at distances of 75 mm, compared to an isocentric treatment even with a full six DOF correction. Without the ability to correct angular positioning errors, a lesion positioned 75 mm away from the mechanical isocenter can be located in 3.6% of patients > 3.0 mm distant from the planned position. Dosimetric results depend upon the distance from isocenter and the size of the target. Single isocenter treatments for multiple lesions should be considered only when full six DOF corrections can be applied, the intrafractional immobilization precision is well quantified, and a PTV expansion is included for more distant lesions to account for unavoidable residual patient positioning uncertainties.

SUBMITTER: Winey B

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5711043 | biostudies-literature | 2014 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Geometric and dosimetric uncertainties in intracranial stereotatctic treatments for multiple nonisocentric lesions.

Winey Brian B Bussiere Marc M

Journal of applied clinical medical physics 20140508 3

The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of geometric uncertainties of patient position on treatments of multiple nonisocentric intracranial lesions. The average distance between lesions in patients with multiple targets was determined by a retrospective survey of patients with multiple lesions. Retrospective patient imaging data from fractionated stereotactic patients were used to calculate interfractional and intrafractional patient position uncertainty. Three different immobiliz ...[more]

PMID: 24892339

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeWhile intensity modulated proton therapy can deliver simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) to the dominant intraprostatic lesion (DIL) with high precision, it is sensitive to anatomic changes. We investigated the dosimetric effects from these changes based on pretreatment cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) images and identified the most important factors using a multilayer perceptron neural network (MLPNN).Methods and materialsDILs were contoured based on coregistered multiparametric magnetic resonance images for 25 previously treated prostate cancer patients. SIB plans were created with (1) prostate clinical target volume - V70 Gy = 98%; (2) DIL - V98 Gy > 95%; and (3) all organs at risk (OARs)"?> within clinical constraints. SIB plans were applied to daily CBCT-based deformed planning computed tomography (CT)"?>. DIL - V98 Gy, bladder/rectum maximum dose (Dmax) and volume changes, femur shifts, and the distance from DIL to organs at riskOARs"?> in both planning computed tomogramsCT"?> and CBCT were calculated. Wilcoxon signed-ranks tests were used to compare the changes. MLPNNs were used to model the change in ΔDIL - V98 Gy > 10% and bladder/rectum Dmax > 80 Gy, and the relative importance factors for the model were provided. The performances of the models were evaluated with receiver operating characteristic curves.ResultsComparing initial plan to the average from evaluation plans, respectively, DIL - V98 Gy was 89.3% ± 19.9% versus 86.2% ± 21.3% (P = .151); bladder Dmax 71.9 ± 0.6 Gy versus 74.5 ± 2.9 Gy (P < .001); and rectum Dmax 70.1 ± 2.4 Gy versus 74.9 ± 9.1Gy (P = .007). Bladder and rectal volumes were 99.6% ± 39.5% and 112.8% ± 27.2%, respectively, of their initial volume. The femur shift was 3.16 ± 2.52 mm. In the modeling of ΔDIL V98 Gy > 10%, DIL to rectum distance changes, DIL to bladder distance changes, and rectum volume changes ratio are the 3 most important factors. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves were 0.89, 1.00, and 0.99 for the modeling of ΔDIL - V98 Gy > 10%, and bladder and rectum Dmax > 80 Gy, respectively.ConclusionsDosimetric changes in DIL SIB with intensity modulated proton therapy can be modeled and classified based on anatomic changes on pretreatment images by an MLPNN.

Project description:PurposeThe characteristic of pulsed beam delivery for synchrotron-based carbon-ion radiotherapy has led to the emergence of many scanning scenarios in order to improve the treatment efficiency and accuracy of moving target volume. Here, we aim to evaluate a novel breathing guidance motion mitigation performance under different synchrotron flattop operation modes in carbon-ion radiotherapy.MethodsWith the use of twelve 4DCT datasets of lung cancer patients who had been treated with respiratory-gated carbon-ion pencil beam therapy, range-adapted internal target volume (raITV) plans were optimized. Under the fixed flattop with single-energy and extended flattop with multi-energy synchrotron operation modes, the 4D treatments with breathing guidance and free breathing-based gated phase-controlled rescanning (PCR) beam delivery were simulated. Dose metrics (D95 and D5-D95 in clinical target volume (CTV)) and treatment time of the resulting 4D plans were compared.ResultsThe two synchrotron operation modes provided different scanning dynamics. For the free breathing-based PCR method delivered in the extended flattop operation mode, the averaged CTV-D95 values were 90.4% ± 3.7%, 95.4% ± 1.7%, 96.9% ± 1.5%, 97.2% ± 1.5%, and 97.3% ± 1.5% for the 1-scanning, 2-PCR, 4-PCR, 6-PCR, and 8-PCR, respectively. For the breathing guidance-based PCR method delivered in the extended flattop mode, these values were 89.1% ± 4.0%, 97.0% ± 1.4%, 98.2% ± 0.7%, 98.6% ± 0.7%, and 98.9% ± 0.7%, respectively. However, CTV-D95 significantly increased to 98.5% ± 1.0% even with just 1-scanning breathing guidance-based fixed flattop operation mode (p < 0.01). Moreover, there was no significant difference in treatment time among the three technical combinations (p > 0.15).ConclusionsThe combination of the breathing guidance and PCR methods should be an alternative way for motion mitigation for the fixed flattop synchrotron operation mode. The target dose coverage and homogeneity could be further improved by the combination of the breathing guidance and PCR methods than the traditional PCR-only technology for the extended flattop synchrotron operation mode.

Project description:Owing to its excellent soft-tissue contrast, magnetic resonance (MR) imaging has found an increased application in radiation therapy (RT). By harnessing these properties for treatment planning, automated segmentation methods can alleviate the manual workload burden to the clinical workflow. We investigated atlas-based segmentation methods of organs at risk (OARs) in the head and neck (H&N) region using one approach that selected the most similar atlas from a library of segmented images and two multi-atlas approaches. The latter were based on weighted majority voting and an iterative atlas-fusion approach called STEPS. We built the atlas library from pre-treatment T1-weighted MR images of 12 patients with manual contours of the parotids, spinal cord and mandible, delineated by a clinician. Following a leave-one-out cross-validation strategy, we measured the geometric accuracy by calculating Dice similarity coefficients (DSC), standard and 95% Hausdorff distances (HD and HD95), and the mean surface distance (MSD), whereby the manual contours served as the gold standard. To benchmark the algorithm, we determined the inter-observer variability (IOV) between three observers. To investigate the dosimetric effect of segmentation inaccuracies, we implemented an auto-planning strategy within the treatment planning system Monaco (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden). For each set of auto-segmented OARs, we generated a plan for a 9-beam step and shoot intensity modulated RT treatment, designed according to our institution's clinical H&N protocol. Superimposing the dose distributions on the gold standard OARs, we calculated dose differences to OARs caused by delineation differences between auto-segmented and gold standard OARs. We investigated the correlations between geometric and dosimetric differences. The mean DSC was larger than 0.8 and the mean MSD smaller than 2?mm for the multi-atlas approaches, resulting in a geometric accuracy comparable to previously published results and within the range of the IOV. While dosimetric differences could be as large as 23% of the clinical goal, treatment plans fulfilled all imposed clinical goals for the gold standard OARs. Correlations between geometric and dosimetric measures were low with R2??<??0.5. The geometric accuracy and the ability to achieve clinically acceptable treatment plans indicate the suitability of using atlas-based contours for RT treatment planning purposes. The low correlations between geometric and dosimetric measures suggest that geometric measures alone are not sufficient to predict the dosimetric impact of segmentation inaccuracies on treatment planning for the data utilised in this study.

Dataset Information

Geometric and dosimetric uncertainties in intracranial stereotatctic treatments for multiple nonisocentric lesions.

Publications

Geometric and dosimetric uncertainties in intracranial stereotatctic treatments for multiple nonisocentric lesions.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets