Dataset Information

Does dynamic stability govern propulsive force generation in human walking?

ABSTRACT: Before succumbing to slower speeds, older adults may walk with a diminished push-off to prioritize stability over mobility. However, direct evidence for trade-offs between push-off intensity and balance control in human walking, independent of changes in speed, has remained elusive. As a critical first step, we conducted two experiments to investigate: (i) the independent effects of walking speed and propulsive force (FP) generation on dynamic stability in young adults, and (ii) the extent to which young adults prioritize dynamic stability in selecting their preferred combination of walking speed and FP generation. Subjects walked on a force-measuring treadmill across a range of speeds as well as at constant speeds while modulating their FP according to a visual biofeedback paradigm based on real-time force measurements. In contrast to improvements when walking slower, walking with a diminished push-off worsened dynamic stability by up to 32%. Rather, we find that young adults adopt an FP at their preferred walking speed that maximizes dynamic stability. One implication of these findings is that the onset of a diminished push-off in old age may independently contribute to poorer balance control and precipitate slower walking speeds.

SUBMITTER: Browne MG

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5717707 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Does dynamic stability govern propulsive force generation in human walking?

Browne Michael G MG Franz Jason R JR

Royal Society open science 20171129 11

Before succumbing to slower speeds, older adults may walk with a diminished push-off to prioritize stability over mobility. However, direct evidence for trade-offs between push-off intensity and balance control in human walking, independent of changes in speed, has remained elusive. As a critical first step, we conducted two experiments to investigate: (i) the independent effects of walking speed and propulsive force (<i>F</i><sub>P</sub>) generation on dynamic stability in young adults, and (ii ...[more]

PMID: 29291129

Similar Datasets

Project description:IntroductionBackward-directed resistance is the resistance applied in the opposite direction of the individual's walking motion. Progressive application of backward-directed resistance during walking at a target speed engages adaptive motor control to maintain that speed. During split-belt walking, a motor control strategy must be applied that allows the person to keep up with the two belts to maintain their position on the treadmill. This situation becomes more challenging when progressive resistance is applied since each limb needs to adapt to the greater resistance to maintain the position. We propose that strategies aimed at changing relative propulsion forces with each limb may explain the motor control strategy used. This study aimed to identify the changes in propulsive force dynamics that allow individuals to maintain their position while walking on an instrumented split-belt treadmill with progressively increasing backward-directed resistance.MethodsWe utilized an instrumented split-belt treadmill while users had to overcome a set of increasing backward-directed resistance through the center of mass. Eighteen non-impaired participants (mean age = 25.2 ± 2.51) walked against five levels of backward resistance (0, 5, 10, 15, and 20% of participant's body weight) in two different modalities: single-belt vs. split-belt treadmill. On the single-belt mode, the treadmill's pace was the participant's comfortable walking speed (CWS). In split-belt mode, the dominant limb's belt pace was half of the CWS, and the non-dominant limb's belt speed was at the CWS.ResultsWe assessed differences between single-belt vs. split-belt conditions in the slope of the linear relationship between change in propulsive impulse relative to change of backward resistance amount. In split-belt conditions, the slower limb showed a significantly steeper increase in propulsion generation compared to the fast limb across resistance levels.DiscussionAs a possible explanation, the slow limb also exhibited a significantly increased slope of the change in trailing limb angle (TLA), which was strongly correlated to the propulsive impulse slope values. We conclude that the motor control strategy used to maintain position on a split-belt treadmill when challenged with backward-directed resistance is to increase the propulsive forces of the slow limb relative to the fast limb by progressively increasing the TLA.Clinical trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT04877249.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Past studies have utilized external interfaces like resistive bands and motor-generated pulling systems to increase limb propulsion during walking on a motorized treadmill. However, assessing changes in limb propulsion against increasing resistance demands during self-controlled walking has not been undertaken. PURPOSE:We assessed limb propulsion against increasing fore-aft loading demands by applying graded fore-aft (FA) resistance at the center of mass during walking in a novel, intent-driven treadmill environment that allowed participants to control their walking speeds. We hypothesized that to maintain a target speed against progressively increasing resistance, participants would proportionately increase their limb propulsion without increasing vertical force production, with accompanying increases in trailing limb angle and positive joint work. METHODS:Seventeen healthy-nonimpaired participants (mean age 52?yrs., SD?=?11) walked at a target, self-controlled speed of 1.0?m/s against 10, 15, 20, and 25% (% body weight) FA resistance levels. We primarily assessed linear slope values across FA resistance levels for mean propulsive force and impulse and vertical impulse of the dominant limb using one-sample t-tests. We further assessed changes in trailing and leading limb angles and joint work using one-way ANOVAs. RESULTS:Participants maintained their target velocity within an a priori defined acceptable range of 1.0?m/s?±?0.2. They significantly increased propulsion proportional to FA resistance (propulsive force mean slope?=?2.45, SD?=?0.7, t (16) =14.44, p?<?0.01; and propulsive impulse mean slope?=?0.7, SD?=?0.25, t (16)?=?11.84, p?<?0.01), but had no changes in vertical impulse (mean slope?=?-?0.04, SD =0.17, p?>?0.05) across FA resistance levels. Mean trailing limb angle increased from 24.3° at 10% resistance to 27.4° at 25% (p?<?0.05); leading limb angle decreased from -?18.4° to -?12.6° (p?<?0.05). We also observed increases in total positive limb work (F (1.7, 26)?=?16.88, p???0.001, ?2?=?0.5), primarily attributed to the hip and ankle joints. CONCLUSIONS:FA resistance applied during self-driven walking resulted in increased propulsive-force output of healthy-nonimpaired individuals with accompanying biomechanical changes that facilitated greater limb propulsion. Future rehabilitation interventions for neurological populations may be able to utilize this principle to design task-specific interventions like progressive strength training and workload manipulation during aerobic training for improving walking function.

Project description:BackgroundEnhancing propulsion during walking is often a focus in physical therapy for those with impaired gait. However, there is no consensus in the literature for assessing braking and propulsion. Both are typically measured from the anterior-posterior ground reaction force (AP-GRF). While normalization of AP-GRF force by bodyweight is commonly done in the analysis, different methods for AP-GRF time axis normalization are used.Research questionDoes walking speed affect propulsion and/or braking, and how do different methods for calculating propulsion and braking impact the conclusion, in both healthy adults and those with lower limb impairment?MethodsWe investigated three different analysis methods for assessing propulsion. 1. BW-TimeIntegration: Bodyweight (BW) normalized time integration of AP-GRF (units of BWs). 2. BW-%StanceIntegration: BW normalized AP-GRF is resampled to percent stance phase prior to integration (units of BW%Stance). 3. BW-Peak: BW normalized peak force (units of BW). We applied these methods to two data sets. One data set included AP-GRFs from trials of slow, self-selected, and fast walking speeds for 203 healthy controls (HCs); a second data set included subjects with lower limb orthopedic injuries.ResultsUsing the BW-TimeIntegration method, we found no effect of walking speed on propulsion for HCs. Time integration over the longer stance phase of slower walking balanced the lower magnitude AP-GRFs of slower walking, resulting in a time-integrated impulse that was the same regardless of walking speed. In contrast, the other two methods that are not time integration methods found that propulsion increased with walking speed. Similarly, in the gait pathology data set, differences in results were found depending on the analysis method used.SignificanceFor many gait studies concerning propulsion and/or braking, the impulse measure used should be related to the body's change of momentum, necessitating an analysis method with a time integration of the AP-GRF.

Dataset Information

Does dynamic stability govern propulsive force generation in human walking?

Publications

Does dynamic stability govern propulsive force generation in human walking?

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets