Dataset Information

The Maximal Oxygen Uptake Verification Phase: a Light at the End of the Tunnel?

ABSTRACT: Commonly performed during an incremental test to exhaustion, maximal oxygen uptake (V?O2max) assessment has become a recurring practice in clinical and experimental settings. To validate the test, several criteria were proposed. In this context, the plateau in oxygen uptake (V?O2) is inconsistent in its frequency, reducing its usefulness as a robust method to determine "true" V?O2max. Moreover, secondary criteria previously suggested, such as expiratory exchange ratios or percentages of maximal heart rate, are highly dependent on protocol design and often are achieved at V?O2 percentages well below V?O2max. Thus, an alternative method termed verification phase was proposed. Currently, it is clear that the verification phase can be a practical and sensitive method to confirm V?O2max; however, procedures to conduct it are not standardized across the literature and no previous research tried to summarize how it has been employed. Therefore, in this review the knowledge on the verification phase was updated, while suggestions on how it can be performed (e.g. intensity, duration, recovery) were provided according to population and protocol design. Future studies should focus to identify a verification protocol feasible for different populations and to compare square-wave and multistage verification phases. Additionally, studies assessing verification phases in different patient populations are still warranted.

SUBMITTER: Schaun GZ

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5721097 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

The Maximal Oxygen Uptake Verification Phase: a Light at the End of the Tunnel?

Schaun Gustavo Z GZ

Sports medicine - open 20171208 1

Commonly performed during an incremental test to exhaustion, maximal oxygen uptake (V̇O2max) assessment has become a recurring practice in clinical and experimental settings. To validate the test, several criteria were proposed. In this context, the plateau in oxygen uptake (V̇O2) is inconsistent in its frequency, reducing its usefulness as a robust method to determine "true" V̇O2max. Moreover, secondary criteria previously suggested, such as expiratory exchange ...[more]

PMID: 29218470

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe 'verification phase' has emerged as a supplementary procedure to traditional maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) criteria to confirm that the highest possible VO2 has been attained during a cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET).ObjectiveTo compare the highest VO2 responses observed in different verification phase procedures with their preceding CPET for confirmation that VO2max was likely attained.MethodsMEDLINE (accessed through PubMed), Web of Science, SPORTDiscus, and Cochrane (accessed through Wiley) were searched for relevant studies that involved apparently healthy adults, VO2max determination by indirect calorimetry, and a CPET on a cycle ergometer or treadmill that incorporated an appended verification phase. RevMan 5.3 software was used to analyze the pooled effect of the CPET and verification phase on the highest mean VO2. Meta-analysis effect size calculations incorporated random-effects assumptions due to the diversity of experimental protocols employed. I2 was calculated to determine the heterogeneity of VO2 responses, and a funnel plot was used to check the risk of bias, within the mean VO2 responses from the primary studies. Subgroup analyses were used to test the moderator effects of sex, cardiorespiratory fitness, exercise modality, CPET protocol, and verification phase protocol.ResultsEighty studies were included in the systematic review (total sample of 1,680 participants; 473 women; age 19-68 yr.; VO2max 3.3 ± 1.4 L/min or 46.9 ± 12.1 mL·kg-1·min-1). The highest mean VO2 values attained in the CPET and verification phase were similar in the 54 studies that were meta-analyzed (mean difference = 0.03 [95% CI = -0.01 to 0.06] L/min, P = 0.15). Furthermore, the difference between the CPET and verification phase was not affected by any of the potential moderators such as verification phase intensity (P = 0.11), type of recovery utilized (P = 0.36), VO2max verification criterion adoption (P = 0.29), same or alternate day verification procedure (P = 0.21), verification-phase duration (P = 0.35), or even according to sex, cardiorespiratory fitness level, exercise modality, and CPET protocol (P = 0.18 to P = 0.71). The funnel plot indicated that there was no significant publication bias.ConclusionsThe verification phase seems a robust procedure to confirm that the highest possible VO2 has been attained during a ramp or continuous step-incremented CPET. However, given the high concordance between the highest mean VO2 achieved in the CPET and verification phase, findings from the current study would question its necessity in all testing circumstances.Prospero registration idCRD42019123540.

Project description:We analysed the importance of systemic and peripheral arteriovenous O2 difference ( a-v¯O2 difference and a-vf O2 difference, respectively) and O2 extraction fraction for maximal oxygen uptake ( V˙O2max ). Fick law of diffusion and the Piiper and Scheid model were applied to investigate whether diffusion versus perfusion limitations vary with V˙O2max . Articles (n = 17) publishing individual data (n = 154) on V˙O2max , maximal cardiac output ( Q˙max ; indicator-dilution or the Fick method), a-v¯O2 difference (catheters or the Fick equation) and systemic O2 extraction fraction were identified. For the peripheral responses, group-mean data (articles: n = 27; subjects: n = 234) on leg blood flow (LBF; thermodilution), a-vf O2 difference and O2 extraction fraction (arterial and femoral venous catheters) were obtained. Q˙max and two-LBF increased linearly by 4.9-6.0 L · min-1 per 1 L · min-1 increase in V˙O2max (R2 = .73 and R2 = .67, respectively; both P < .001). The a-v¯O2 difference increased from 118-168 mL · L-1 from a V˙O2max of 2-4.5 L · min-1 followed by a reduction (second-order polynomial: R2 = .27). After accounting for a hypoxemia-induced decrease in arterial O2 content with increasing V˙O2max (R2 = .17; P < .001), systemic O2 extraction fraction increased up to ~90% ( V˙O2max : 4.5 L · min-1 ) with no further change (exponential decay model: R2 = .42). Likewise, leg O2 extraction fraction increased with V˙O2max to approach a maximal value of ~90-95% (R2 = .83). Muscle O2 diffusing capacity and the equilibration index Y increased linearly with V˙O2max (R2 = .77 and R2 = .31, respectively; both P < .01), reflecting decreasing O2 diffusional limitations and accentuating O2 delivery limitations. In conclusion, although O2 delivery is the main limiting factor to V˙O2max , enhanced O2 extraction fraction (≥90%) contributes to the remarkably high V˙O2max in endurance-trained individuals.

Dataset Information

The Maximal Oxygen Uptake Verification Phase: a Light at the End of the Tunnel?

Publications

The Maximal Oxygen Uptake Verification Phase: a Light at the End of the Tunnel?

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets