Dataset Information

Should Employers Be Permitted not to Hire Smokers? A Review of US Legal Provisions.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Increasingly, healthcare and non-healthcare employers prohibit or penalize the use of tobacco products among current and new employees in the United States. Despite this trend, and for a range of different reasons, around half of states currently legally protect employees from being denied positions, or having employment contracts terminated, due to tobacco use.

Methods

We undertook a conceptual analysis of legal provisions in all 50 states.

Results

We found ethically relevant variations in terms of how tobacco is defined, which employee populations are protected, and to what extent they are protected. Furthermore, the underlying ethical rationales for smoker protection differ, and can be grouped into two main categories: prevention of discrimination and protection of privacy.

Conclusion

We critically discuss these rationales and the role of their advocates and argue that enabling equality of opportunity is a more adequate overarching concept for preventing employers from disadvantaging smokers.

SUBMITTER: Patel RR

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5726320 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Should Employers Be Permitted not to Hire Smokers? A Review of US Legal Provisions.

Patel Rishi R RR Schmidt Harald H

International journal of health policy and management 20171201 12

<h4>Background</h4>Increasingly, healthcare and non-healthcare employers prohibit or penalize the use of tobacco products among current and new employees in the United States. Despite this trend, and for a range of different reasons, around half of states currently legally protect employees from being denied positions, or having employment contracts terminated, due to tobacco use.<h4>Methods</h4>We undertook a conceptual analysis of legal provisions in all 50 states.<h4>Results</h4>We found ethi ...[more]

PMID: 29172377

Similar Datasets

Project description:IntroductionThis study aimed to examine how the proportion of dual users of cigarettes and e-cigarettes who use e-cigarettes in situations where smoking is not permitted has changed since e-cigarettes became popular in England, and to characterize those who do so.MethodsData were from 5081 adults in England who reported current smoking and current use of e-cigarettes ('dual users') participating in a nationally-representative monthly survey between April 2011 and February 2020. We modeled quarterly changes in prevalence of e-cigarette use in situations where smoking is not permitted and assessed multivariable associations with sociodemographic and smoking characteristics.ResultsBetween 2011 and 2020, prevalence of e-cigarette use in situations where smoking is not permitted followed a positive cubic trend, with a decelerating increase from an estimated 52.5% of dual users in Q2-2011 to 72.7% in Q3-2014, followed by a small decline to 67.5% in 2018, and subsequent increase to 74.0% in 2020. Odds were higher among those who were from more disadvantaged social grades, reported stronger smoking urges, or had made a past-year quit attempt, and lower among those who were aged at least 65 years (vs. 16-24 years), from the south (vs. north) of England, reported currently cutting down on their cigarette consumption or currently using nicotine replacement therapy.ConclusionsIn England, use of e-cigarettes in situations where smoking is not permitted is common among dual cigarette and e-cigarette users, has increased nonlinearly since 2011, and is particularly prevalent among those who are younger, disadvantaged, more addicted, have recently failed to quit, and are not attempting to cut down.ImplicationsThe ability to use nicotine in smoke-free settings appears to be an important part of the appeal of e-cigarettes. It is possible that if e-cigarette use was prohibited in public places, smokers may be deterred from using e-cigarettes alongside combustible tobacco, which could undermine quitting. Our results suggest disadvantaged and more addicted smokers would be disproportionately affected, suggesting such restrictions may contribute to inequalities in smoking and associated health outcomes.

Dataset Information

Should Employers Be Permitted not to Hire Smokers? A Review of US Legal Provisions.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Should Employers Be Permitted not to Hire Smokers? A Review of US Legal Provisions.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets