Dataset Information

Assessment of patient-reported outcome and quality of life improvement following surgery for epiphora.

ABSTRACT: PurposeTo assess and compare the subjective improvement in symptoms and quality of life in adult patients who underwent commonly performed oculoplastic surgical interventions to treat epiphora.Materials and methodsA prospective study was undertaken involving all adult patients undergoing dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR), lid tightening (lateral tarsal strip or lateral wedge resection), and punctoplasty surgery at our institution. We assessed severity of epiphora preoperatively using the Munk score. At 3 months postoperatively, all patients were sent postal questionnaires comprising of Munk score, 'social impact score' from validated Lac-Q questionnaire ranging from 0 (no impact) to 5 (maximal negative impact) and Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI) score, ranging from -100 (maximal detriment) to +100 (maximal benefit).ResultsA total of 134 questionnaires were sent with an overall response rate of 74.6%. For the purpose of data analysis, patients were divided into four groups: DCR, lid tightening, punctoplasty, and combined group (lid tightening plus punctoplasty). There was statistically significant improvement in subjective epiphora postoperatively, as assessed by Munk score (P<0.001) in all groups. The total GBI scores were +42.67 (95% CI: 33.42-51.91) for DCR, +19.65 (95% CI: 10.33-28.97) for lid tightening, +16.06 (95% CI: 2.65-29.48) for punctoplasty, and +26.53 (95% CI: 13.15-39.90) for the combined group, demonstrating a positive change in health status for all groups. There was negative correlation between total GBI and post-operative Munk scores (r=-0.58, P<0.001), and positive correlation between Lac-Q and Munk scores (r=0.65, P<0.001).ConclusionPatients derived significant improvement in symptoms and health-related quality of life benefit following all surgical interventions for epiphora.

SUBMITTER: Sipkova Z

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5733284 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Assessment of patient-reported outcome and quality of life improvement following surgery for epiphora.

Sipkova Z Z Vonica O O Olurin O O Obi E E EE Pearson A R AR

Eye (London, England) 20170616 12

PurposeTo assess and compare the subjective improvement in symptoms and quality of life in adult patients who underwent commonly performed oculoplastic surgical interventions to treat epiphora.Materials and methodsA prospective study was undertaken involving all adult patients undergoing dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR), lid tightening (lateral tarsal strip or lateral wedge resection), and punctoplasty surgery at our institution. We assessed severity of epiphora preoperatively using the Munk score. A ...[more]

PMID: 28622317

Similar Datasets

Project description:Objective or purposeTo develop and test a patient-reported outcome measure for assessing health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in surgically amenable epiphora.DesignQuestionnaire development and validation study.Participants201 patients with a cause of epiphora amenable to surgical intervention, recruited across three independent centres.Methods, intervention or testingThe watery eye quality of life (WEQOL) questionnaire was developed and refined according to defined psychometric standards. Both surgical and non-surgical participants completed WEQOL at baseline and follow-up (>3 months), along with the Lacrimal Symptom Questionnaire (Lac-Q), RAND Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) and Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI). Convergent validity of WEQOL was evaluated according to correlation (R > 0.40) with each of these additional tests. Responsiveness of WEQOL to intervention was evaluated according to patient-reported success. Test-retest reliability was assessed by the Bland-Altman method and intraclass correlation (ICC) in a subset of 64 participants at baseline.Main outcome measuresWEQOL construct validity, responsiveness and test-retest reliability.ResultsWEQOL was moderately correlated (R > 0.4) with the Lac-Q and several subscales of the SF-36 (physical role limitation, social, emotional role limitation and emotional well-being). A stronger correlation was found between the change in WEQOL at follow-up and GBI (R = 0.61). An appropriate graded response was found with a significant change in WEQOL score being observed in patients reporting successful (-28%, p < 0.0001) and partially successful surgery (-6%, p = 0.04), but not in those reporting unsuccessful surgery (+2%, p = 0.9). High test-retest reliability was observed (ICC = 0.93).ConclusionsThe WEQOL questionnaire has been developed systematically according to modern psychometric standards and has been designed to evaluate the quality of life in patients with epiphora that is of a surgically amenable cause. In this study, it has demonstrated appropriate test-retest reliability, responsiveness and construct validity.

Project description:BackgroundThere is growing interest in using patient-reported outcome measures to support value-based care in colorectal surgery. To draw valid conclusions regarding patient-reported outcomes data, measures with robust measurement properties are required.ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to assess the use and quality of patient-reported outcome measures in colorectal surgery.Data sourcesThree major databases were searched for studies using patient-reported outcome measures in the context of colorectal surgery.Study selectionArticles that used patient-reported outcome measures as outcome for colorectal surgical intervention in a comparative effectiveness analysis were included. Exclusion criteria included articles older than 11 years, non-English language, age <18 years, fewer than 40 patients, case reports, review articles, and studies without comparison.Main outcome measuresThis was a quality assessment using a previously reported checklist of psychometric properties.ResultsFrom 2007 to 2018, 368 studies were deemed to meet inclusion criteria. These studies used 165 distinct patient-reported outcome measures. Thirty were used 5 or more times and were selected for quality assessment. Overall, the measures were generally high quality, with 21 (70%) scoring ≥14 on an 18-point scale. Notable weaknesses included management of missing data (14%) and description of literacy level (0%).LimitationsThe study was limited by its use of original articles for quality assessment. Measures were selected for quality analysis based on frequency of use rather than other factors, such as impact of the article or number of patients in the study.ConclusionsPatient-reported outcome measures are widely used in colorectal research. There was a wide range of measures available, and many were used only once. The most frequently used measures are generally high quality, but a majority lack details on how to deal with missing data and information on literacy levels. As the use of patient-reported outcome measures to assess colorectal surgical intervention increases, researchers and practitioners need to become more knowledgeable about the measures available and their quality.

Project description:BackgroundPatient reported outcome measures (PROMs) can be used by healthcare organisations to inform improvements in service delivery. However, routine collection of PROMs is difficult to achieve across an entire healthcare organisation. An understanding of the use of PROMs within an organisation can provide valuable insights on the purpose, scope and practical considerations of PROMs collection, which can inform implementation of PROMs.MethodsWe used multiple research methods to assess the use of PROMs in research projects, data registries and clinical care across a healthcare organisation from January 2014 to April 2021. The methods included an audit of ethics applications approved by the organisation's human research ethics committee and registries which the health organisation had contributed data to; a literature review of peer-reviewed journal articles reporting on research projects conducted at the organisation; and a survey of health professionals use of PROMs in research projects, data registries and clinical care. The scope of PROMs was determined by classifying PROMs as either 'specific' to a particular disease and/or condition, or as a 'generic' measure with further classification based on the health domains they measured, using the World Health Organization International Classification Framework. Practical considerations included mode and timing of PROMs administration. Data were described using frequency and proportion.ResultsPROMs were used by 22% of research projects (n = 144/666), 68% of data registries (n = 13/19), and 76% of clinical specialties in their clinical care (n = 16/21). Disease specific PROMs were most commonly used: 83% of research projects (n = 130/144), 69% of clinical registries (n = 9/13), and 75% of clinical specialties (n = 12/16). Greater than 80% of research projects, clinical registries and clinical specialties measured health domains relating to both body impairments and participation in daily life activities. The most commonly used generic PROM was the EQ-5D (research projects n = 56/144, 39%; data registries n = 5/13, 38%; clinical specialties n = 4/16, 25%). PROMs used in clinical care were mostly paper-based (n = 47/55, 85%).ConclusionsWe have elicited information on the use of PROMs to inform a health organisation wide implementation strategy. Future work will determine clinician and patient acceptability of the EQ-5D, and co-design a system for the collection of PROMs.

Dataset Information

Assessment of patient-reported outcome and quality of life improvement following surgery for epiphora.

Publications

Assessment of patient-reported outcome and quality of life improvement following surgery for epiphora.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets