Dataset Information

Efficacy of Abiraterone and Enzalutamide in Pre- and Postdocetaxel Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Trial-Level Meta-Analysis.

ABSTRACT: We examined the comparative efficacies of first-line abiraterone and enzalutamide in pre- and postdocetaxel settings in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) through a trial level meta-analysis. A mixed method approach was applied to 19 unique studies containing 17 median overall survival (OS) estimates and 13 median radiographic progression-free survival (PFS) estimates. We employed a random-effects meta-analysis to compare efficacies of abiraterone and enzalutamide with respect to OS and PFS. In the predocetaxel setting, enzalutamide use was associated with an increase in median OS of 5.9 months (p < 0.001), hazard ratio (HR) = 0.81, and an increase in median PFS of 8.3 months (p < 0.001), HR = 0.47 compared to abiraterone. The advantage of enzalutamide improved after adjusting for baseline Gleason score to 19.5 months (p < 0.001) and 14.6 months (p < 0.001) in median OS and PFS, respectively. In the postdocetaxel setting, the advantage of enzalutamide use was nominally significant for median PFS (1.2 months p = 0.02 without adjustment and 2.2 months and p = 0.0007 after adjustment); there was no significant difference in median OS between the two agents. The results from this comprehensive meta-analysis suggest a survival advantage with the use of first-line enzalutamide over abiraterone in CRPC and highlight the need for prospective clinical trials.

SUBMITTER: Fang M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5735648 | biostudies-literature | 2017

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Efficacy of Abiraterone and Enzalutamide in Pre- and Postdocetaxel Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Trial-Level Meta-Analysis.

Fang Mike M Nakazawa Mary M Antonarakis Emmanuel S ES Antonarakis Emmanuel S ES Li Chun C

Prostate cancer 20171121

We examined the comparative efficacies of first-line abiraterone and enzalutamide in pre- and postdocetaxel settings in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) through a trial level meta-analysis. A mixed method approach was applied to 19 unique studies containing 17 median overall survival (OS) estimates and 13 median radiographic progression-free survival (PFS) estimates. We employed a random-effects meta-analysis to compare efficacies of abiraterone and enzalutamide with respect to OS and ...[more]

PMID: 29359049

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:It is hypothesised that cotargeting the androgen receptor (AR) and paracrine androgen biosynthesis with enzalutamide and abiraterone acetate in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) will dissipate adaptive feedback loops observed with either agent alone. OBJECTIVE:To assess the safety, efficacy, androgen signalling/metabolome, and drug-drug interactions (DDIs) of enzalutamide with abiraterone acetate in progressive bone mCRPC (bmCRPC). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS:This open-label, single-centre interventional study was conducted in bmCRPC patients. INTERVENTION:Enzalutamide 160mg and abiraterone acetate 1000mg once daily; prednisone 5mg twice daily. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS:Adverse events (AEs), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response, progression-free survival (PFS), tumour biomarker/metabolite expression, and Cmin plasma concentrations were evaluated. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS:Sixty patients were enrolled. Common AEs independent of grade/causality included fatigue (72%), hyperglycaemia (67%), alkaline phosphatase (ALP) elevation (53%), and hot flush (43%). Grade 3 AEs included hypertension (17%), alanine aminotransferase elevation (12%), ALP elevation (5%), and arthralgia (5%). No treatment-related grade 4 AEs or deaths were reported. Median treatment-discontinuation time was 312d (95% confidence interval [CI] 196.0-483.0). Maximal PSA decline ?50% and ?90% occurred in 46 (77%) and 29 (48%) patients, respectively. Median PFS was 251d (95% CI 147-337). At week 9, median tumour microenvironment androgens, precursors, and nuclear AR expression decreased (p<0.001). The baseline tumour AR C/N terminal ratio of ?80% was associated with treatment benefit. At enzalutamide steady state, abiraterone acetate Cmin was ?23% lower (range 14.05-200.5ng/ml) than when given alone. CONCLUSIONS:Enzalutamide combined with abiraterone acetate has a manageable safety profile, without a meaningful DDI. Both agents are pharmacodynamically active with no feedback. Efficacy findings do not support significant benefit of combined treatment for unselected bmCRPC. PATIENT SUMMARY:This is the first study combining enzalutamide plus abiraterone in bone metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Results show that this combination is safe.

Project description:BackgroundThe optimal sequencing of the multiple active agents now available for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is unclear. Prior reports have suggested diminished responses to sequential lines of androgen receptor (AR)-targeted therapies, but it is unknown whether subsequent taxane-based chemotherapy may be more effective than sequential AR-targeting treatment. We sought to evaluate the clinical activity of enzalutamide versus docetaxel in men with mCRPC who progressed on abiraterone.MethodsWe performed a single-institution retrospective analysis of consecutive mCRPC patients who had progressed on abiraterone therapy and subsequently received either enzalutamide (n=30) or docetaxel (n=31). We evaluated clinical outcomes including prostate-specific antigen decline of >30% (PSA30) or >50% (PSA50), PSA-progression-free survival (PSA-PFS), and clinical/radiographic PFS. We performed multivariable modeling to control for baseline and on-treatment differences between groups.ResultsCompared to subjects who received enzalutamide post-abiraterone, subjects who received docetaxel post-abiraterone had more bone metastases, more visceral metastases, higher baseline PSA, and had more frequent PSA tests while on-treatment. There were no significant differences in PSA30 (41% for enzalutamide vs. 53% for docetaxel) or PSA50 (34% vs. 40%) response rates between the two groups; there remained no difference after stratifying by presence/absence of prior response to abiraterone. Median PSA-PFS was 4.1 versus 4.1 months for the enzalutamide and docetaxel cohorts, respectively (HR 1.35, 95% CI, 0.53-3.66, P=0.502). Median PFS was 4.7 versus 4.4 months, respectively (HR 1.44, 95% CI, 0.77-2.71, P=0.257). PSA-PFS and PFS did not differ after stratifying by prior response to abiraterone. In multivariable analyses, there were no significant differences in PSA-PFS or PFS between the two groups.ConclusionsTreatment with either enzalutamide or docetaxel produced modest PSA responses and PFS intervals in this abiraterone-pretreated mCRPC population. In this retrospective study with small sample size, no significant differences in outcomes were observed between groups. Therefore, either enzalutamide or docetaxel may be a reasonable option in men who have progressed on abiraterone.

Project description:PURPOSE:Androgen receptor (AR) gene alterations, including ligand-binding domain mutations and copy number (CN) gain, have yet to be fully established as predictive markers of resistance to enzalutamide and abiraterone in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). The goal of this study was to validate AR gene alterations detected in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) as markers of enzalutamide and abiraterone resistance in patients with mCRPC. METHODS:Patients with mCRPC (N = 62) were prospectively enrolled between 2014 and 2018. Blood was collected before therapies-enzalutamide (n = 25), abiraterone (n = 35), or enzalutamide and abiraterone (n = 2)-and at disease progression. We used deep next-generation sequencing to analyze cfDNA for sequence variants and CN status in AR and 45 additional cancer-associated genes. Primary end points were prostate-specific antigen response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS:Elevated tumor-specific cfDNA (circulating tumor DNA) was associated with a worse prostate-specific antigen response (hazard ratio [HR], 3.17; 95% CI, 1.11 to 9.05; P = .031), PFS (HR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.03 to 3.01; P = .039), and OS (HR, 2.92; 95% CI, 1.40 to 6.11; P = .004). AR ligand-binding domain missense mutations (HR, 2.51; 95% CI, 1.15 to 5.72; P = .020) were associated with a shorter PFS in multivariable models. AR CN gain was associated with a shorter PFS; however, significance was lost in multivariable modeling. Genetic alterations in tumor protein p53 (HR, 2.70; 95% CI, 1.27 to 5.72; P = .009) and phosphoinositide 3-kinase pathway defects (HR, 2.62; 95% CI, 1.12 to 6.10; P = .026) were associated with a worse OS in multivariable models. CONCLUSION:These findings support the conclusion that high circulating tumor DNA burden is associated with worse outcomes to enzalutamide and abiraterone in men with mCRPC. Tumor protein p53 loss and phosphoinositide 3-kinase pathway defects were associated with worse OS in men with mCRPC. AR status associations with outcomes were not robust, and additional validation is needed.

Dataset Information

Efficacy of Abiraterone and Enzalutamide in Pre- and Postdocetaxel Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Trial-Level Meta-Analysis.

Publications

Efficacy of Abiraterone and Enzalutamide in Pre- and Postdocetaxel Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Trial-Level Meta-Analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets