Dataset Information

Metronomic chemotherapy for non-metastatic triple negative breast cancer: Selection is the key.

ABSTRACT: Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) accounts for 15%-20% of all breast cancer, and is still defined as what it is not. Currently, TNBC is the only type of breast cancer for which there are no approved targeted therapies and maximum tolerated dose chemotherapy with taxanes and anthracycline-containing regimens is still the standard of care in both the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings. In the last years, metronomic chemotherapy (MC) is being explored as an alternative to improve outcomes in TNBC. In the neoadjuvant setting, purely metronomic and hybrid approaches have been developed with the objective of increasing complete pathologic response (pCR) and prolonging disease free survival. These regimens proved to be very effective achieving pCR rates between 47%-60%, but at the cost of great toxicity. In the adjuvant setting, MC is used to intensify adjuvant chemotherapy and, more promisingly, as maintenance therapy for high-risk patients, especially those with no pCR after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Considering the dismal prognosis of TNBC, any strategy that potentially improves outcomes, specially being the oral agents broadly available and inexpensive, should be considered and certainly warrants further exploration. Finally, the benefit of MC needs to be validated in properly designed clinical trials were the selection of the population is the key.

SUBMITTER: Rabanal C

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5740099 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Metronomic chemotherapy for non-metastatic triple negative breast cancer: Selection is the key.

Rabanal Connie C Ruiz Rossana R Neciosup Silvia S Gomez Henry H

World journal of clinical oncology 20171201 6

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) accounts for 15%-20% of all breast cancer, and is still defined as what it is not. Currently, TNBC is the only type of breast cancer for which there are no approved targeted therapies and maximum tolerated dose chemotherapy with taxanes and anthracycline-containing regimens is still the standard of care in both the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings. In the last years, metronomic chemotherapy (MC) is being explored as an alternative to improve outcomes in TNBC ...[more]

PMID: 29291168

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:Chemotherapy resistance is a great obstacle in effective treatment for metastatic triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). The ability to predict chemotherapy response would allow chemotherapy administration to be directed toward only those patients who would benefit, thus maximizing treatment efficiency. Differentially expressed plasma proteins may serve as putative biomarkers for predicting chemotherapy outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS:In this study, 26 plasma samples (10 samples with partial response (S) and 16 samples with progression disease (R)) from patients with metastatic TNBC were measured by Tandem Mass Tag (TMT)-based proteomics analysis to identify differentially expressed proteins between the S and R group. Potential proteinswere validated with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in another 67 plasma samples. RESULTS:A total of 320 plasma proteins were identified, and statistical analysis showed that 108 proteins were significantly dysregulated between R and S groups in the screening stage. Bioinformatics revealed relevant pathways and regulatory networks of the differentially expressed proteins. Three differentially expressed proteins were validated by ELISA with 67 samples from TNBC patients. The R group had significantly higher plasma CAMK2A level than the S group (P=0.0074). The ROC curve analysis showed an AUC of 0.708, with sensitivity 48.4% and specificity 86.1%. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, the level of plasma CAMK2A was also significant for chemotherapeutic response (P=0.009, OR=0.152). Furthermore, the patients with higher CAMK2A level had shorter OS than those with lower CAMK2A level, which amounted to 13.9 and 28.9 months, respectively (P=0.034). In the multivariate Cox regression analysis, CAMK2A level still had significant effect on OS (P=0.031, HR=1.865). CONCLUSION:TMT-based proteomic analysis was able to identify potential biomarkers in plasma that predicted chemotherapy resistance in the metastatic TNBC. The plasma of CAMK2A level may serve as apotential predictive and prognostic biomarker for chemotherapy in metastatic TNBC.

Project description:Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a heterogeneous disease that can be classified into distinct molecular subtypes by gene expression profiling. Considered a difficult-to-treat cancer, a fraction of TNBC patients benefit significantly from neoadjuvant chemotherapy and have far better overall survival. Outside of BRCA1/2 mutation status, biomarkers do not exist to identify patients most likely to respond to current chemotherapy; and, to date, no FDA-approved targeted therapies are available for TNBC patients. Previously, we developed an approach to identify six molecular subtypes TNBC (TNBCtype), with each subtype displaying unique ontologies and differential response to standard-of-care chemotherapy. Given the complexity of the varying histological landscape of tumor specimens, we used histopathological quantification and laser-capture microdissection to determine that transcripts in the previously described immunomodulatory (IM) and mesenchymal stem-like (MSL) subtypes were contributed from infiltrating lymphocytes and tumor-associated stromal cells, respectively. Therefore, we refined TNBC molecular subtypes from six (TNBCtype) into four (TNBCtype-4) tumor-specific subtypes (BL1, BL2, M and LAR) and demonstrate differences in diagnosis age, grade, local and distant disease progression and histopathology. Using five publicly available, neoadjuvant chemotherapy breast cancer gene expression datasets, we retrospectively evaluated chemotherapy response of over 300 TNBC patients from pretreatment biopsies subtyped using either the intrinsic (PAM50) or TNBCtype approaches. Combined analysis of TNBC patients demonstrated that TNBC subtypes significantly differ in response to similar neoadjuvant chemotherapy with 41% of BL1 patients achieving a pathological complete response compared to 18% for BL2 and 29% for LAR with 95% confidence intervals (CIs; [33, 51], [9, 28], [17, 41], respectively). Collectively, we provide pre-clinical data that could inform clinical trials designed to test the hypothesis that improved outcomes can be achieved for TNBC patients, if selection and combination of existing chemotherapies is directed by knowledge of molecular TNBC subtypes.

Dataset Information

Metronomic chemotherapy for non-metastatic triple negative breast cancer: Selection is the key.

Publications

Metronomic chemotherapy for non-metastatic triple negative breast cancer: Selection is the key.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets