Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Application of Bayesian analysis to the doubly labelled water method for total energy expenditure in humans.


ABSTRACT: RATIONALE:The doubly labelled water (DLW) method is the reference method for the estimation of free-living total energy expenditure (TEE). In this method, where both 2 H and 18 O are employed, different approaches have been adopted to deal with the non-conformity observed regarding the distribution space for the labels being non-coincident with total body water. However, the method adopted can have a significant effect on the estimated TEE. METHODS:We proposed a Bayesian reasoning approach to modify an assumed prior distribution for the space ratio using experimental data to derive the TEE. A Bayesian hierarchical approach was also investigated. The dataset was obtained from 59 adults (37 women) who underwent a DLW experiment during which the 2 H and 18 O enrichments were measured using isotope ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS). RESULTS:TEE was estimated at 9925 (9106-11236) [median and interquartile range], 9646 (9167-10540), and 9,638 (9220-10340) kJ·day-1 for women and at 13961 (12851-15347), 13353 (12651-15088) and 13211 (12653-14238) kJ·day-1 for men, using normalized non-Bayesian, independent Bayesian and hierarchical Bayesian approaches, respectively. A comparison of hierarchical Bayesian with normalized non-Bayesian methods indicated a marked difference in behaviour between genders. The median difference was -287 kJ·day-1 for women, and -750 kJ·day-1 for men. In men there is an appreciable compression of the TEE distribution obtained from the hierarchical model compared with the normalized non-Bayesian methods (range of TEE 11234-15431 kJ·day-1 vs 10786-18221 kJ·day-1 ). An analogous, yet smaller, compression is seen in women (7081-12287 kJ·day-1 vs 6989-13775 kJ·day-1 ). CONCLUSIONS:The Bayesian analysis is an appealing method to estimate TEE during DLW experiments. The principal advantages over those obtained using the classical least-squares method is the generation of potentially more useful estimates of TEE, and improved handling of outliers and missing data scenarios, particularly if a hierarchical model is used.

SUBMITTER: Ruan Y 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5765481 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Application of Bayesian analysis to the doubly labelled water method for total energy expenditure in humans.

Ruan Yue Y   Bluck Les C J LCJ   Smith James J   Mander Adrian A   Singh Priya P   Venables Michelle M  

Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM 20180101 1


<h4>Rationale</h4>The doubly labelled water (DLW) method is the reference method for the estimation of free-living total energy expenditure (TEE). In this method, where both <sup>2</sup> H and <sup>18</sup> O are employed, different approaches have been adopted to deal with the non-conformity observed regarding the distribution space for the labels being non-coincident with total body water. However, the method adopted can have a significant effect on the estimated TEE.<h4>Methods</h4>We propose  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC5966477 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8034874 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5870239 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4562631 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7358076 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5086746 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10556674 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9891919 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6499509 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10273089 | biostudies-literature