Dataset Information

Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy Combined With Immunotherapy for Solid Tumors.

ABSTRACT: Immunotherapy, particularly immune-checkpoint inhibition, is producing encouraging clinical responses and affecting the way numerous cancers are treated. Yet immune-checkpoint therapy is not effective for many patients, and even those who initially respond can experience relapse, fueling interest in finding new processes or tools to improve the effectiveness of these novel therapeutics. One such tool is radiation. Both preclinical and clinical studies have demonstrated that the systemic effects of immunotherapy can be amplified when it is used in combination with radiation and, conversely, that the immunogenic effects of local irradiation can be amplified and extended to distant sites when used with immunotherapy. We review how stereotactic ablative radiation therapy, a technique specifically indicated for tumors treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors, can potentiate the effects of immune-checkpoint therapy. We further explore how these novel therapeutics may transform radiation, previously considered a local treatment option, into powerful systemic therapy.

SUBMITTER: Brooks ED

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5812885 | biostudies-literature | 2016 Jul-Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy Combined With Immunotherapy for Solid Tumors.

Brooks Eric D ED Schoenhals Jonathan E JE Tang Chad C Micevic Goran G Gomez Daniel R DR Chang Joe Y JY Welsh James W JW

Cancer journal (Sudbury, Mass.) 20160701 4

Immunotherapy, particularly immune-checkpoint inhibition, is producing encouraging clinical responses and affecting the way numerous cancers are treated. Yet immune-checkpoint therapy is not effective for many patients, and even those who initially respond can experience relapse, fueling interest in finding new processes or tools to improve the effectiveness of these novel therapeutics. One such tool is radiation. Both preclinical and clinical studies have demonstrated that the systemic effects ...[more]

PMID: 27441745

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposePatients with oligometastatic colorectal cancer have demonstrated excellent clinical outcomes with surgical resection of hepatic and pulmonary metastases. Stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) has emerged as an alternative local therapy for nonsurgical candidates. Herein, we report the oncologic and patient-reported quality-of-life (PR-QoL) outcomes for a subset of patients with oligometastatic colorectal cancer who were treated in a prospective phase 2 multicenter clinical trial.Methods and materialsPatients with a pathologically proven diagnosis of oligometastatic colorectal cancer were enrolled as part of a prospective study. SABR dose and fractionation schedules were dependent on the lesion location and size. Patient follow-up occurred 6 weeks after completion of SABR and at 3-month intervals for the following 3 years. Patients received the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General questionnaire at baseline and at each follow-up visit to assess PR-QoL. The total Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General questionnaire scores were compared with those from baseline using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Overall survival, local progression-free survival (PFS), and distant PFS were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier estimation to the date of the last follow-up visit/death or local/distant failure.ResultsA total of 31 patients with oligometastatic colorectal cancer with 1 (71.0%), 2 (16.1%), 3 (3.2%), 4 (3.2%), or 5 (6.5%) metastatic lesions were identified. After a median follow-up time of 50.1 months, the median OS from the time of completion of the SABR was 53.9 months (95% confidence interval, 23.2-84.6), and the 5-year OS, local PFS, and distant PFS were 45%, 83%, and 27%, respectively. Acute grade 2+ toxicity was 9.7% (pain, nausea, fatigue) and late grade 3+ toxicity (small bowel obstruction) was 3.2% with no significant change in PR-QoL in the year after SABR.ConclusionsThis subset analysis of a prospective phase 2 study demonstrates that SABR is a safe and effective treatment option for patients with unresectable oligometastic colorectal cancer. In addition, SABR of oligometastatic disease preserves PR-QoL.

Project description:PurposeThe use of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in pediatric patients has been underreported. We reviewed practice patterns, outcomes, and toxicity of SBRT in this population.Methods and materialsIn this multi-institutional study, 55 patients with 107 non-central nervous system lesions treated with SBRT between 2010 and 2016 were reviewed. Treatment response was evaluated by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 and modified RECIST v1.1 criteria for soft-tissue and bone lesions, respectively. Patterns of local failure (LF) were assessed dosimetrically. The cumulative incidence of LF and toxicity were estimated accounting for the competing risk event of death. Predictors of LF were identified through joint frailty models for clustered competing risks.ResultsThe median (range) dose/fraction was 7 (4.5-25) Gy, the total (range) dose/site was 35 (12-45), and the median (range) number of fractions was 5 (1-9). The radiographic response rates of bone and soft-tissue lesions were 90.6% and 76.7%, respectively. Symptom improvement was observed for 62% of symptomatic sites. A total of 27 LFs were documented, with 14 in-field, 9 marginal, and 4 out-of-field LFs. The 1-year estimated cumulative LF rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival were 25.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 17.2%-36.1%), 17.5% (95% CI, 9.0%-34.1%), and 61% (95% CI, 48.9%-76.1%), respectively. Lesion type (soft tissue vs bone) was the only significant predictor of LF on multivariable analysis (P = .04), with increased hazard for soft-tissue lesions. No acute or late toxicity of grade 4 or higher was observed; the estimated 1-year cumulative incidence of late toxicity of any grade was 7.5% (95% CI, 3.6%-12.1%).ConclusionsThe SBRT was well tolerated and resulted in radiographic response and symptom palliation in most pediatric patients with advanced disease. The 1-year cumulative LF rate of 25% will serve as a benchmark for further modifications to radiation therapy indications, parameters, and combination therapy.

Project description:To investigate boosting dominant intraprostatic lesions (DILs) in the context of stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) and to examine the impact on tumor control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP).Ten prostate datasets were selected. DILs were defined using T2-weighted, dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Four plans were produced for each dataset: (1) no boost to DILs; (2) boost to DILs, no seminal vesicles in prescription; (3) boost to DILs, proximal seminal vesicles (proxSV) prescribed intermediate dose; and (4) boost to DILs, proxSV prescribed higher dose. The prostate planning target volume (PTV) prescription was 42.7 Gy in 7 fractions. DILs were initially prescribed 115% of the PTV(Prostate) prescription, and PTV(DIL) prescriptions were increased in 5% increments until organ-at-risk constraints were reached. TCP and NTCP calculations used the LQ-Poisson Marsden, and Lyman-Kutcher-Burman models respectively.When treating the prostate alone, the median PTV(DIL) prescription was 125% (range: 110%-140%) of the PTV(Prostate) prescription. Median PTV(DIL) D50% was 55.1 Gy (range: 49.6-62.6 Gy). The same PTV(DIL) prescriptions and similar PTV(DIL) median doses were possible when including the proxSV within the prescription. TCP depended on prostate ?/? ratio and was highest with an ?/? ratio = 1.5 Gy, where the additional TCP benefit of DIL boosting was least. Rectal NTCP increased with DIL boosting and was considered unacceptably high in 5 cases, which, when replanned with an emphasis on reducing maximum dose to 0.5 cm(3) of rectum (Dmax(0.5cc)), as well as meeting existing constraints, resulted in considerable rectal NTCP reductions.Boosting DILs in the context of SABR is technically feasible but should be approached with caution. If this therapy is adopted, strict rectal constraints are required including Dmax(0.5cc). If the ?/? ratio of prostate cancer is 1.5 Gy or less, then high TCP and low NTCP can be achieved by prescribing SABR to the whole prostate, without the need for DIL boosting.

Project description:Abstract Background Background: It is estimated that a significant number of patients presenting with metastatic RCC are either ineligible, not recommended for, or refuse surgery. There remains no well-established method for addressing the primary tumor in such patients. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is a highly effective modality for the treatment of the primary tumor in RCC. Our study seeks to evaluate SABR as an alternative approach to treat the primary tumor in patients with metastatic RCC receiving immunotherapy, who are not recommended for surgery, or who decline surgery. The primary objective of the study is to determine whether the addition of SABR to the primary tumor in combination with immunotherapy improves outcomes compared to immunotherapy alone in patients with metastatic, unresected, renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The primary endpoint is nephrectomy and radiographic progression-free survival (nrPFS) with progression determined as per iRECIST criteria. Patients are eligible if they are not recommended for upfront surgery, have a primary tumor treatable with SABR, and are candidates for immunotherapy. Immunotherapy is physician’s choice and will include either two different immunotherapy regimens (IO-IO) or immunotherapy in combination with a VEGF inhibitor (IO-VEGF). Methods 240 patients will be randomized in a 2:1 ratio favoring SABR plus immunotherapy (n=160) as compared to standard of care immunotherapy alone (n=80). The sample size will provide 90% power at a one-sided alpha level of 0.05 to detect a hazard ratio for nrPFS of 0.61, i.e., a 40% reduction in the rate of events. One-year PFS in the nivolumab plus ipilmumab arm was 50% (n=550, intermediate/poor risk population). Checkmate 9ER (Choueiri 2021) showed a one-year PFS rate in patients receiving nivolumab plus Cabozantinib (n=323) of 45-58% (intermediate/poor risk population). We have therefore estimated a one-year nrPFS rate of 50% in the control (immunotherapy alone) arm for SAMURAI. We expect nephrectomies to contribute only a small fraction to the total nrPRS events. To detect a hazard ratio of 0.62, which corresponds under exponential distribution assumptions to an absolute 15% improvement in one-year nrPFS from 50% in the control group to 65% in the experimental arm (SABR plus immunotherapy), a total sample size of 240 patients will be enrolled. This design will provide 90% power, based on a one-sided logrank test at the 0.05 alpha level, with three years of accrual and two further years of follow-up. The expected number of nrPFS events is E=175. The calculations allow for a 10% non-eligible/early dropout rate. The trial is currently open and accruing through the NRG oncology cooperative group (NCT05327686).

Dataset Information

Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy Combined With Immunotherapy for Solid Tumors.

Publications

Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy Combined With Immunotherapy for Solid Tumors.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets