Dataset Information

Comparative Evaluation of Four Real-Time PCR Methods for the Quantitative Detection of Epstein-Barr Virus from Whole Blood Specimens.

ABSTRACT: Monitoring of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) load in immunocompromised patients has become integral to their care. An increasing number of reagents are available for quantitative detection of EBV; however, there are little published comparative data. Four real-time PCR systems (one using laboratory-developed reagents and three using analyte-specific reagents) were compared with one another for detection of EBV from whole blood. Whole blood specimens seeded with EBV were used to determine quantitative linearity, analytical measurement range, lower limit of detection, and CV for each assay. Retrospective testing of 198 clinical samples was performed in parallel with all methods; results were compared to determine relative quantitative and qualitative performance. All assays showed similar performance. No significant difference was found in limit of detection (3.12-3.49 log10 copies/mL; P = 0.37). A strong qualitative correlation was seen with all assays that used clinical samples (positive detection rates of 89.5%-95.8%). Quantitative correlation of clinical samples across assays was also seen in pairwise regression analysis, with R(2) ranging from 0.83 to 0.95. Normalizing clinical sample results to IU/mL did not alter the quantitative correlation between assays. Quantitative EBV detection by real-time PCR can be performed over a wide linear dynamic range, using three different commercially available reagents and laboratory-developed methods. EBV was detected with comparable sensitivity and quantitative correlation for all assays.

SUBMITTER: Buelow D

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5818632 | biostudies-literature | 2016 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Comparative Evaluation of Four Real-Time PCR Methods for the Quantitative Detection of Epstein-Barr Virus from Whole Blood Specimens.

Buelow Daelynn D Sun Yilun Y Tang Li L Gu Zhengming Z Pounds Stanley S Hayden Randall R

The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD 20160505 4

Monitoring of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) load in immunocompromised patients has become integral to their care. An increasing number of reagents are available for quantitative detection of EBV; however, there are little published comparative data. Four real-time PCR systems (one using laboratory-developed reagents and three using analyte-specific reagents) were compared with one another for detection of EBV from whole blood. Whole blood specimens seeded with EBV were used to determine quantitative ...[more]

PMID: 27157323

Similar Datasets

Project description:Chlamydia pneumoniae, an important respiratory pathogen, is difficult to culture, and detection rates by conventional PCRs vary considerably. A new quantitative ompA-based real-time PCR assay based on TaqMan technology for detection of C. pneumoniae in respiratory samples is described, and its performance in terms of sensitivity and reproducibility is compared with those of four published conventional PCRs (one single-step PCR targeting a cloned PstI fragment; two nested PCRs, one targeting the 16S rRNA gene followed by hybridization and the other targeting the ompA gene; and a touchdown enzyme time-release [TETR] PCR also targeting the 16S rRNA gene). Both ompA-based PCRs showed the best analytical sensitivity. All five assays could detect even lower target levels from spiked sputum, with the 16S rRNA assays performing better than the ompA-based nested PCR (10(-6) inclusion-forming units [IFU] were detected in four of four and two of four replicates by the 16S rRNA TETR PCR and the 16S rRNA nested PCR, respectively). In general, the ompA-based real-time protocol produced the most consistent positive results for all replicates tested down to 10(-6) IFU. Eight of 45 patient sputum specimens (18%) were C. pneumoniae DNA positive in at least one of four replicates tested by at least one assay. Without taking into consideration the analytical sensitivity or the reproducibility of the test results, the numbers of C. pneumoniae DNA-positive sputum specimens (n = 8) were four, three, two, two, and one for the 16S rRNA TETR assay, the PstI-based single-step PCR, the ompA-based real-time PCR, the ompA-based nested touchdown PCR, and the 16S rRNA-based nested PCR, respectively. However, the overall rate of concordance of positive results was low. Only one cell culture-positive sputum specimen was positive by four of five assays (14 of 16 replicates; mean cycle threshold value, 25; 10(8) particles/ml of sputum). Thirty-seven specimens were C. pneumoniae negative by all five assays for all replicates tested, as were all negative controls (n = 65 to 100 per testing panel). No PCR inhibitors were detected by real-time PCR or by the 16S rRNA-based nested assay. We confirm that the analytical sensitivity of an assay for the detection of C. pneumoniae does not necessarily predict its ability to detect its target in sputum. A quantitative, fast, and easy-to-handle diagnostic approach such as the ompA-based real-time TaqMan PCR described here might improve the detection of C. pneumoniae in respiratory samples.

Project description:BackgroundThere are currently many different methods for processing and summarizing probe-level data from Affymetrix oligonucleotide arrays. It is of great interest to validate these methods and identify those that are most effective. There is no single best way to do this validation, and a variety of approaches is needed. Moreover, gene expression data are collected to answer a variety of scientific questions, and the same method may not be best for all questions. Only a handful of validation studies have been done so far, most of which rely on spike-in datasets and focus on the question of detecting differential expression. Here we seek methods that excel at estimating relative expression. We evaluate methods by identifying those that give the strongest linear association between expression measurements by array and the "gold-standard" assay. Quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) is generally considered the "gold-standard" assay for measuring gene expression by biologists and is often used to confirm findings from microarray data. Here we use qRT-PCR measurements to validate methods for the components of processing oligo array data: background adjustment, normalization, mismatch adjustment, and probeset summary. An advantage of our approach over spike-in studies is that methods are validated on a real dataset that was collected to address a scientific question.ResultsWe initially identify three of six popular methods that consistently produced the best agreement between oligo array and RT-PCR data for medium- and high-intensity genes. The three methods are generally known as MAS5, gcRMA, and the dChip mismatch mode. For medium- and high-intensity genes, we identified use of data from mismatch probes (as in MAS5 and dChip mismatch) and a sequence-based method of background adjustment (as in gcRMA) as the most important factors in methods' performances. However, we found poor reliability for methods using mismatch probes for low-intensity genes, which is in agreement with previous studies.ConclusionWe advocate use of sequence-based background adjustment in lieu of mismatch adjustment to achieve the best results across the intensity spectrum. No method of normalization or probeset summary showed any consistent advantages.

Dataset Information

Comparative Evaluation of Four Real-Time PCR Methods for the Quantitative Detection of Epstein-Barr Virus from Whole Blood Specimens.

Publications

Comparative Evaluation of Four Real-Time PCR Methods for the Quantitative Detection of Epstein-Barr Virus from Whole Blood Specimens.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets