Dataset Information

Multiplexed one-step RT-PCR VP7 and VP4 genotyping assays for rotaviruses using updated primers.

ABSTRACT: The current two-step VP7 and VP4 genotyping RT-PCR assays for rotaviruses have been linked consistently to genotyping failure in an estimated 30% of RVA positive samples worldwide. We have developed a VP7 and VP4 multiplexed one-step genotyping assays using updated primers generated from contemporary VP7 and VP4 sequences. To determine assay specificity and sensitivity, 17 reference virus strains, 6 non-target gastroenteritis viruses and 725 clinical samples carrying the most common VP7 (G1, G2, G3, G4, G9, and G12) and VP4 (P[4], P[6], P[8], P[9] and P[10]) genotypes were tested in this study. All reference RVA strain targets yielded amplicons of the expected sizes and non-target genotypes and gastroenteritis viruses were not detected by either assay. Out of the 725 clinical samples tested, the VP7 and VP4 assays were able to assigned specific genotypes to 711 (98.1%) and 714 (98.5%), respectively. The remaining unassigned samples were re-tested for RVA antigen using EIA and qRT-PCR assays and all were found to be negative. The overall specificity, sensitivity and limit of detection of the VP7 assay were in the ranges of 99.0-100%, 94.0-100% and 8.6×10(1) to 8.6×10(2) copies of RNA/reaction, respectively. For the VP4 assay, the overall specificity, sensitivity and limit of detection assay were in the ranges of 100%, 94.0-100% and ?1 to 8.6×10(2) copies of RNA/reaction, respectively. Here we report two highly robust, accurate, efficient, affordable and documentable gel-based genotyping systems which are capable of genotyping 97.8% of the six common VP7 and 98.3% of the five common VP4 genotypes of RVA strains which are responsible for approximately 88.2% of all RVA infections worldwide.

SUBMITTER: Esona MD

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5818709 | biostudies-literature | 2015 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Multiplexed one-step RT-PCR VP7 and VP4 genotyping assays for rotaviruses using updated primers.

Esona Mathew D MD Gautam Rashi R Tam Ka Ian KI Williams Alice A Mijatovic-Rustempasic Slavica S Bowen Michael D MD

Journal of virological methods 20150729

The current two-step VP7 and VP4 genotyping RT-PCR assays for rotaviruses have been linked consistently to genotyping failure in an estimated 30% of RVA positive samples worldwide. We have developed a VP7 and VP4 multiplexed one-step genotyping assays using updated primers generated from contemporary VP7 and VP4 sequences. To determine assay specificity and sensitivity, 17 reference virus strains, 6 non-target gastroenteritis viruses and 725 clinical samples carrying the most common VP7 (G1, G2, ...[more]

PMID: 26231786

Similar Datasets

Project description:Rotavirus infections can be diagnosed in stool samples by serological and molecular methods. We developed a novel reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) method for the amplification of rotavirus RNA and a reverse hybridization assay on a strip to detect amplimers and identify the specific G and P genotypes present in human stool specimens. An additional aim was to permit specific identification of the rotavirus G1P[8] strain, used in the Rotarix vaccine. Novel broad-spectrum PCR primers were developed for both VP4 and VP7, permitting the amplification of a wide range of rotavirus genotypes. Primer sets comprise mixtures of defined primer sequences. For the identification of G and P genotypes, two reverse hybridization strip assays were developed. Both the VP4 and the VP7 strip contain universal probes for the detection of VP4 and VP7 sequences, irrespective of the G or P genotype. The VP4 strip contains type-specific probes for P[4], P[6], P[8], P[9], and P[10]. The VP7 strip contains type-specific probes for G1, G2, G3, G4, G5, G6, G8, and G9. In addition, probes to distinguish between wild-type G1 and G1 vaccine strain sequences were present. Testing by analysis of multiple reference strains confirmed that both RT-PCR methods allowed the detection of a broad spectrum of genotypes. RT-PCR for VP7 was more sensitive than RT-PCR for VP4, but all samples identified as positive for rotavirus antigen by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) were also positive for both VP4 and VP7. The high specificity of the reverse hybridization method was confirmed by sequence analysis as well as by type-specific PCR, and the vaccine strain could also be specifically identified. The reverse hybridization method permits accurate identification of mixed infections with different genotypes. Rotavirus genotypes for which no type-specific probes were present on the strip were adequately identified by the universal detection probes. The assay was formally validated by analyses of specificity, sensitivity, precision, accuracy, and robustness. In a panel of 149 ELISA-positive stool samples, comparison with conventional type-specific RT-PCR methods revealed the superiority of the novel method, mainly in cases of mixed rotavirus infections. This novel method permits highly accurate detection and identification of human rotavirus infections in stool samples. This validated assay could be useful for large-scale epidemiological and clinical trials.

Dataset Information

Multiplexed one-step RT-PCR VP7 and VP4 genotyping assays for rotaviruses using updated primers.

Publications

Multiplexed one-step RT-PCR VP7 and VP4 genotyping assays for rotaviruses using updated primers.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets