Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Concordance Between Different Amyloid Immunoassays and Visual Amyloid Positron Emission Tomographic Assessment.


ABSTRACT: Importance:Visual assessment of amyloid positron emission tomographic (PET) images has been approved by regulatory authorities for clinical use. Several immunoassays have been developed to measure ?-amyloid (A?) 42 in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). The agreement between CSF A?42 measures from different immunoassays and visual PET readings may influence the use of CSF biomarkers and/or amyloid PET assessment in clinical practice and trials. Objective:To determine the concordance between CSF A?42 levels measured using 5 different immunoassays and visual amyloid PET analysis. Design, Setting, and Participants:The study included 262 patients with mild cognitive impairment or subjective cognitive decline from the Swedish BioFINDER (Biomarkers for Identifying Neurodegenerative Disorders Early and Reliably) cohort (recruited from September 1, 2010, through December 31, 2014) who had undergone flutemetamol F 18 ([18F]flutemetamol)-labeled PET. Levels of CSF A?42 were analyzed using the classic INNOTEST and the newer modified INNOTEST, fully automated Lumipulse (FL), EUROIMMUN (EI), and Meso Scale Discovery (MSD) assays. Concentrations of CSF A? were assessed using an antibody-independent mass spectrometry-based reference measurement procedure. Main Outcomes and Measures:The concordance of CSF A?42 levels and A?42:A?40 and A?42:tau ratios with visual [18F]flutemetamol PET status. Results:Of 262 participants (mean [SD] age, 70.9 [5.5] years), 108 were women (41.2%) and 154 were men (58.8%). The mass spectrometry-derived A?42 values showed higher correlations with the modified A?42-INNOTEST (r?=?0.97), A?42-FL (r?=?0.93), A?42-EI (r?=?0.93), and A?42-MSD (r?=?0.95) assays compared with the classic A?42-INNOTEST assay (r?=?0.88; P???.01). The signal in the classic A?42-INNOTEST assay was partly quenched by recombinant A?1-40 peptide. However, the classic A?42-INNOTEST assay showed better concordance with visual [18F]flutemetamol PET status (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC], 0.92) compared with the newer assays (AUCs, 0.87-0.89; P???.01). The accuracies of the newer assays improved significantly when A?42:A?40 (AUCs, 0.93-0.95; P???.01), A?42 to total tau (T-tau) (AUCs, 0.94; P???.05), or A?42 to phosphorylated tau (P-tau) (AUCs, 0.94-0.95; P???.001) ratios were used. A combination of the A?42:A?40 ratio and T-tau or P-tau level did not improve the accuracy compared with the ratio alone. Conclusions and Relevance:Concentrations of CSF A?42 derived from the new immunoassays (modified INNOTEST, FL, EI, and MSD) may correlate better with the antibody-independent mass spectrometry-based reference measurement procedure and may show improved agreement with visual [18F]flutemetamol PET assessment when using the A?42:A?40 or A?42:tau ratios. These findings suggest the benefit of implementing the CSF A?42:A?40 or A?42:tau ratios as a biomarker of amyloid deposition in clinical practice and trials.

SUBMITTER: Janelidze S 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5822196 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Concordance Between Different Amyloid Immunoassays and Visual Amyloid Positron Emission Tomographic Assessment.

Janelidze Shorena S   Pannee Josef J   Mikulskis Alvydas A   Chiao Ping P   Zetterberg Henrik H   Blennow Kaj K   Hansson Oskar O  

JAMA neurology 20171201 12


<h4>Importance</h4>Visual assessment of amyloid positron emission tomographic (PET) images has been approved by regulatory authorities for clinical use. Several immunoassays have been developed to measure β-amyloid (Aβ) 42 in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). The agreement between CSF Aβ42 measures from different immunoassays and visual PET readings may influence the use of CSF biomarkers and/or amyloid PET assessment in clinical practice and trials.<h4>Objective</h4>To determine the concordance betwee  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC9219197 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4083834 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7110644 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5287290 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3083828 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6854805 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5357677 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4045094 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3251921 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6139433 | biostudies-literature