Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Importance
The US Food and Drug Administration has classified tanning beds as carcinogenic. Most states have enacted legislation to prevent or create barriers for minors accessing tanning establishments. Determining tanning salon compliance with legislation would provide an indication of the influence of legislation at preventing exposure to the carcinogen in minors.Objectives
To investigate compliance rates in the 42 states and the District of Columbia with legislation restricting tanning bed use in minors and to identify differences in compliance based on population, regional location, salon ownership, age group being regulated, and time since the law was enacted.Design, setting, and participants
This investigation was a cross-sectional telephone survey conducted between February 1, 2015, and April 30, 2016, by callers posing as minors attempting to schedule a tanning appointment. The setting was tanning salons in the 42 states and the District of Columbia that currently have legislation restricting tanning bed use in minors. Included in the study were 427 tanning salons, 10 randomly selected from each state or territory with tanning legislation.Main outcomes and measures
Overall compliance of tanning salons with state tanning legislation and differences in compliance based on community population, regional location, independent vs chain tanning salon, age group being regulated, and time since the law was enacted.Results
Of the 427 tanning salons surveyed, overall noncompliance with state legislation was 37.2% (n?=?159). There were more noncompliant tanning salons in rural locations (45.5%; 95% CI, 37.5%-53.7%; P?=?.009), southern regions of the United States (49.4%; 95% CI, 41.4%-57.4%; P?=?.001), independently owned salons (43.9%; 95% CI, 37.3%-50.6%; P?=?.003), states with younger age groups being regulated (53.5%; 95% CI, 45.7%-61.2%; P?Conclusions and relevanceCompliance with state legislation aimed at limiting tanning bed use among US minors is unsatisfactory, indicating that additional efforts to enforce the laws and education of the harmful effects of UV tanning are necessary, especially in rural, independently owned, and tanning salons in southern regions, which have decreased compliance rates.
SUBMITTER: Williams MS
PROVIDER: S-EPMC5833576 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Jan
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
JAMA dermatology 20180101 1
<h4>Importance</h4>The US Food and Drug Administration has classified tanning beds as carcinogenic. Most states have enacted legislation to prevent or create barriers for minors accessing tanning establishments. Determining tanning salon compliance with legislation would provide an indication of the influence of legislation at preventing exposure to the carcinogen in minors.<h4>Objectives</h4>To investigate compliance rates in the 42 states and the District of Columbia with legislation restricti ...[more]