Dataset Information

Association of Immunotherapy With Overall Survival in Elderly Patients With Melanoma.

ABSTRACT: Importance:Melanoma treatment has been revolutionized with the development of immune-based therapies that offer durable clinical responses in a subset of patients. Clinical outcomes after treatment by immunotherapy can be influenced by the host's immune system. The immune system is modified with age by age-related immune dysfunction. Objective:To evaluate if age influences clinical outcome and immune adverse events in patients treated by immunotherapy for metastatic melanoma. Design, Setting, and Participants:This was a single-center cohort analysis in patients treated with immunotherapy for metastatic melanoma between January 2007 and February 2016, in the Lyon Sud Hospital, France. A total of 92 patients with metastatic melanoma treated with ipilimumab, nivolumab, or pembrolizumab were retrospectively analyzed. Main Outcomes and Measures:Overall survival, progression-free survival, and immune-related adverse events were evaluated for each treatment line according to the patients' age. Results:A total of 92 patients were eligible and included in this study for a total of 120 lines of treatment. Fifty-four patients were included in the cohort that was 65 years or younger (24 [44%] were female; mean [SD] age, 48.1 [12.5] years), and 38 patients were included in the cohort that was older than 65 years (12 [34%] were female; mean [SD] age, 74.8 [6.9] years). Mean follow-up duration starting at treatment initiation was 12.5 months. Patients older than 65 years treated with immunotherapy had a better mean progression-free survival (4.8 vs 3.4 months; P?=?.04) and overall survival (not reached vs 10.1 months; P?=?.009) than younger patients in univariate analysis, and after adjusting on prognosis covariates. This was particularly true with patients treated with anti-programmed cell death protein 1. Common immune-related adverse effects were similar in both cohorts. Conclusions and Relevance:Age might be associated with a better clinical outcome after treatment with immunotherapy in the real-life setting. In our cohort, older patients did not have more immune-related adverse events. Further studies are warranted to confirm our results and describe the underlying mechanisms involved.

SUBMITTER: Perier-Muzet M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5833580 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Association of Immunotherapy With Overall Survival in Elderly Patients With Melanoma.

Perier-Muzet Marie M Gatt Elodie E Péron Julien J Falandry Claire C Amini-Adlé Mona M Thomas Luc L Dalle Stephane S Boespflug Amelie A

JAMA dermatology 20180101 1

<h4>Importance</h4>Melanoma treatment has been revolutionized with the development of immune-based therapies that offer durable clinical responses in a subset of patients. Clinical outcomes after treatment by immunotherapy can be influenced by the host's immune system. The immune system is modified with age by age-related immune dysfunction.<h4>Objective</h4>To evaluate if age influences clinical outcome and immune adverse events in patients treated by immunotherapy for metastatic melanoma.<h4>D ...[more]

PMID: 29214290

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceExisting criteria to estimate the benefit of a therapy in patients with cancer rely almost exclusively on tumor size, an approach that was not designed to estimate survival benefit and is challenged by the unique properties of immunotherapy. More accurate prediction of survival by treatment could enhance treatment decisions.ObjectiveTo validate, using radiomics and machine learning, the performance of a signature of quantitative computed tomography (CT) imaging features for estimating overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced melanoma treated with immunotherapy.Design, setting, and participantsThis prognostic study used radiomics and machine learning to retrospectively analyze CT images obtained at baseline and first follow-up and their associated clinical metadata. Data were prospectively collected in the KEYNOTE-002 (Study of Pembrolizumab [MK-3475] Versus Chemotherapy in Participants With Advanced Melanoma; 2017 analysis) and KEYNOTE-006 (Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Two Different Dosing Schedules of Pembrolizumab [MK-3475] Compared to Ipilimumab in Participants With Advanced Melanoma; 2016 analysis) multicenter clinical trials. Participants included 575 patients with a diagnosis of advanced melanoma who were randomly assigned to training and validation sets. Data for the present study were collected from November 20, 2012, to June 3, 2019, and analyzed from July 1, 2019, to September 15, 2021.InterventionsKEYNOTE-002 featured trial groups testing intravenous pembrolizumab, 2 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg every 2 or every 3 weeks based on randomization, or investigator-choice chemotherapy; KEYNOTE-006 featured trial groups testing intravenous ipilimumab, 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks and intravenous pembrolizumab, 10 mg/kg every 2 or 3 weeks based on randomization.Main outcomes and measuresThe performance of the signature CT imaging features for estimating OS at the month 6 posttreatment landmark in patients who received pembrolizumab was measured using an area under the time-dependent receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC).ResultsA random forest model combined 25 imaging features extracted from tumors segmented on CT images to identify the combination (signature) that best estimated OS with pembrolizumab in 575 patients. The signature combined 4 imaging features, 2 related to tumor size and 2 reflecting changes in tumor imaging phenotype. In the validation set (287 patients treated with pembrolizumab), the signature reached an AUC for estimation of OS status of 0.92 (95% CI, 0.89-0.95). The standard method, Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1, achieved an AUC of 0.80 (95% CI, 0.75-0.84) and classified tumor outcomes as partial or complete response (93 of 287 [32.4%]), stable disease (90 of 287 [31.3%]), or progressive disease (104 of 287 [36.2%]).Conclusions and relevanceThe findings of this prognostic study suggest that the radiomic signature discerned from conventional CT images at baseline and on first follow-up may be used in clinical settings to provide an accurate early readout of future OS probability in patients with melanoma treated with single-agent programmed cell death 1 blockade.

Project description:BackgroundRecent advances in targeted therapy and immunotherapy have improved the prognosis of melanoma patients but brain metastasis remains a major challenge. Currently, it is unclear how existing therapies can be best used to prevent or treat brain metastasis in melanoma patients.AimsWe aimed to assess brain metastasis free survival (BMFS), overall survival (OS), incidence of brain metastases, and sequencing strategies of immunotherapy and targeted therapy in patients with BRAF-mutated advanced melanoma.Methods and resultsWe retrospectively analyzed 683 patients with BRAF-mutated advanced melanoma treated with first line (1L) immunotherapy (N = 266) or targeted therapy (N = 417). The primary outcome was BMFS. Secondary outcomes included OS of all patients and incidence of brain metastases in patients without documented brain metastases prior to 1L therapy. The median BMFS was 13.7 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 12.4-16.0] among all patients. The median BMFS for patients receiving 1L immunotherapy was 41.9 months [95% CI: 22.8-not reached (NR)] and targeted therapy was 11.0 months (95% CI: 8.8-12.5). Median OS results were qualitatively similar to BMFS results. The cumulative incidence of brain metastases for patients receiving 1L targeted therapy was higher than for patients receiving 1L immunotherapy (P < .001). Patients receiving 1L anti-CTLA4 plus anti-PD1 combination immunotherapy only or followed by second line (2L) targeted therapy had better BMFS (HR 0.40, 95% CI: 0.24-0.67, P = .001), improved OS (HR 0.49, 95% CI: 0.30-0.81, P = .005), and reduced incidence of brain metastases (HR 0.47, 95% CI: 0.24-0.67, P = .047) than patients receiving 1L combination BRAF and MEK targeted therapy followed by 2L immunotherapy.ConclusionPatients with advanced BRAF mutant melanoma treated with 1L immunotherapy have significantly longer BMFS and OS, and reduced incidence of brain metastases, compared with those treated with 1L targeted therapy. Further studies evaluating the ability of immunotherapy and targeted therapy to improve OS and prevent brain metastases are warranted.

Project description:the prognostic significance of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in intermediate/thick primary cutaneous melanoma (PCM) remains controversial, partially because conventional evaluation is not reliable, due to inter-observer variability and diverse scoring methods. We aimed to assess the prognostic impact of the density and spatial distribution of immune cells in early stage intermediate/thick PCM. digital image acquisition and quantitative analysis of tissue immune biomarkers (CD3, CD4, CD8, CD68, PD-L1, CD163, FOX-P3, and PD-1) was carried out in a training cohort, which included patients with primary PCM ≥ 2 mm diagnosed, treated, and followed-up prospectively in three Italian centers. Results were validated in an independent Italian cohort. in the training cohort, 100 Stage II-III melanoma patients were valuable. At multivariable analysis, a longer disease free survival (DFS) was statistically associated with higher levels of CD4+ intratumoral T-cells (aHR [100 cell/mm2 increase] 0.98, 95%CI 0.95-1.00, p = 0.041) and CD163+ inner peritumoral (aHR [high vs. low] 0.56, 95%CI 0.32-0.99, p = 0.047). A statistically significant longer DFS (aHR [high-high vs. low-low] 0.52, 95%CI 0.28-0.99, p = 0.047) and overall survival (OS) (aHR [high-high vs. low-low] 0.39, 95%CI 0.18-0.85, p = 0.018) was found in patients with a high density of both intratumoral CD8+ T-cells and CD68+ macrophages as compared to those with low density of both intratumoral CD8+ T-cells and CD68+ macrophages. Consistently, in the validation cohort, patients with high density of both intratumoral CD8+ and CD3+ T-cells were associated to a statistically better DFS (aHR[high-high vs. low-low] 0.24, 95%CI 0.10-0.56, p < 0.001) and those with high density of both intratumoral CD8+ and CD68+ were associated to a statistically longer OS (aHR[high-high vs. low-low] 0.28, 95%CI 0.09-0.86, p = 0.025). our findings suggest that a specific preexisting profile of T cells and macrophages distribution in melanomas may predict the risk of recurrence and death with potential implications for the stratification of stage II-III melanoma patients.

Dataset Information

Association of Immunotherapy With Overall Survival in Elderly Patients With Melanoma.

Publications

Association of Immunotherapy With Overall Survival in Elderly Patients With Melanoma.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets