Dataset Information

Association of Antibiotic Exposure With Survival and Toxicity in Patients With Melanoma Receiving Immunotherapy.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Gut microbial diversity is associated with improved response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Based on the known detrimental impact that antibiotics have on microbiome diversity, we hypothesized that antibiotic receipt prior to ICI would be associated with decreased survival.

Methods

Patients with stage III and IV melanoma treated with ICI between 2008 and 2019 were selected from an institutional database. A window of antibiotic receipt within 3 months prior to the first infusion of ICI was prespecified. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), and secondary outcomes were melanoma-specific mortality and immune-mediated colitis requiring intravenous steroids. All statistical tests were two-sided.

Results

There were 568 patients in our database of which 114 received antibiotics prior to ICI. Of the patients, 35.9% had stage III disease. On multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis of patients with stage IV disease, the antibiotic-exposed group had statistically significantly worse OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.27 to 2.57; P <.001). The same effect was observed among antibiotic-exposed patients with stage III disease (HR = 2.78, 95% CI = 1.31 to 5.87; P =.007). When limited to only patients who received adjuvant ICI (n = 89), antibiotic-exposed patients also had statistically significantly worse OS (HR = 4.84, 95% CI = 1.09 to 21.50; P =.04). The antibiotic group had a greater incidence of colitis (HR = 2.14, 95% CI = 1.02 to 4.52; P =.046).

Conclusion

Patients with stage III and IV melanoma exposed to antibiotics prior to ICI had statistically significantly worse OS than unexposed patients. Antibiotic exposure was associated with greater incidence of moderate to severe immune-mediated colitis. Given the large number of antibiotics prescribed annually, physicians should be judicious with their use in cancer populations likely to receive ICI.

SUBMITTER: Mohiuddin JJ

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7850522 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveThe influence of body composition on the effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with melanoma is still uncertain in clinical practice. Therefore, the objective of this study was to examine the potential association between body composition and clinical outcomes in patients with melanoma undergoing ICIs treatment.MethodsA systematic literature search was performed across several databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar, to gather relevant studies. The primary outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), assessed by hazard ratios (HR). Secondary outcomes, such as adverse events (AE), were evaluated using odds ratios (OR).ResultsThis meta-analysis comprised ten articles involving a total of 1,283 patients. Systemic analysis of all collected evidence revealed that body composition, including low skeletal muscle index (SMI) (OS: HR = 1.66, 95% CI = 1.13-2.43, p = 0.010; PFS: HR = 1.28, 95% CI = 1.06-1.55, p = 0.009), high subcutaneous adipose tissue density (SMD) (OS: HR = 1.93, 95% CI = 1.09-3.44, p = 0.025; PFS: HR = 1.31, 95% CI = 1.06-1.63, p = 0.012), and sarcopenia (OS: HR = 1.25, 95% CI = 1.03-1.51, p = 0.022; PFS: HR = 1.25, 95% CI = 1.03-1.51, p = 0.022), were significantly associated with OS and PFS in melanoma patients treated with ICIs. However, these markers did not show a significant association with treatment-related adverse events. Interestingly, no significant correlation was found between visceral fat index (VFI) (OS: HR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.29-1.76, p = 0.462; PFS: HR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.93-1.02, p = 0.274) and OS or PFS in melanoma patients under ICIs treatment.ConclusionBody composition was found to be associated with decreased treatment response and lower long-term efficacy in patients with melanoma undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. However, it is important to note that body composition did not appear to contribute to increased incidence of adverse events in these patients.

Project description:Importance:Melanoma treatment has been revolutionized with the development of immune-based therapies that offer durable clinical responses in a subset of patients. Clinical outcomes after treatment by immunotherapy can be influenced by the host's immune system. The immune system is modified with age by age-related immune dysfunction. Objective:To evaluate if age influences clinical outcome and immune adverse events in patients treated by immunotherapy for metastatic melanoma. Design, Setting, and Participants:This was a single-center cohort analysis in patients treated with immunotherapy for metastatic melanoma between January 2007 and February 2016, in the Lyon Sud Hospital, France. A total of 92 patients with metastatic melanoma treated with ipilimumab, nivolumab, or pembrolizumab were retrospectively analyzed. Main Outcomes and Measures:Overall survival, progression-free survival, and immune-related adverse events were evaluated for each treatment line according to the patients' age. Results:A total of 92 patients were eligible and included in this study for a total of 120 lines of treatment. Fifty-four patients were included in the cohort that was 65 years or younger (24 [44%] were female; mean [SD] age, 48.1 [12.5] years), and 38 patients were included in the cohort that was older than 65 years (12 [34%] were female; mean [SD] age, 74.8 [6.9] years). Mean follow-up duration starting at treatment initiation was 12.5 months. Patients older than 65 years treated with immunotherapy had a better mean progression-free survival (4.8 vs 3.4 months; P = .04) and overall survival (not reached vs 10.1 months; P = .009) than younger patients in univariate analysis, and after adjusting on prognosis covariates. This was particularly true with patients treated with anti-programmed cell death protein 1. Common immune-related adverse effects were similar in both cohorts. Conclusions and Relevance:Age might be associated with a better clinical outcome after treatment with immunotherapy in the real-life setting. In our cohort, older patients did not have more immune-related adverse events. Further studies are warranted to confirm our results and describe the underlying mechanisms involved.

Project description:ImportanceThe prognosis for patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is dismal, due in part to chemoresistance. Bacteria-mediated mechanisms of chemoresistance suggest a potential role for antibiotics in modulating response to chemotherapy.ObjectiveTo evaluate whether use of peritreatment antibiotics is associated with survival among patients with metastatic PDAC treated with first-line gemcitabine or fluorouracil chemotherapy.Design, setting, and participantsUsing the population-based Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare linked database, this retrospective cohort study analyzed data for patients diagnosed with PDAC between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2017. Data analysis was conducted between September 1, 2021, and January 15, 2023. The population-based sample included 3850 patients with primary metastatic PDAC treated with first-line gemcitabine or fluorouracil chemotherapy. Patients who received antibiotics were matched based on propensity scores to patients who did not receive antibiotics.ExposuresReceipt of 5 or more days of oral antibiotics or 1 injectable antibiotic in the month before or after beginning first-line chemotherapy.Main outcomes and measuresOverall survival and cancer-specific survival. The end of follow-up was December 31, 2019, for overall survival and December 31, 2018, for cancer-specific survival.ResultsOf the 3850 patients treated with first-line gemcitabine (3150 [81.8%]) or fluorouracil (700 [18.2%]), 2178 (56.6%) received antibiotics. The mean (SD) age at diagnosis was 74.2 (5.8) years and patients were predominantly women (2102 [54.6%]), White (3396 [88.2%]), and from metropolitan areas (3393 [88.1%]) in the northeastern or western US (2952 [76.7%]). In total, 1672 propensity-matched pairs were analyzed. Antibiotic receipt was associated with an 11% improvement in overall survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.89; 95% CI, 0.83-0.96; P = .003) and a 16% improvement in cancer-specific survival (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.77-0.92; P < .001) among patients treated with gemcitabine. In contrast, there was no association between antibiotic receipt and overall survival (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.90-1.29; P = .41) or cancer-specific survival (HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.90-1.36; P = .29) among patients treated with fluorouracil. In a subgroup of gemcitabine-treated patients who received antibiotics, nonpenicillin β-lactams were associated with an 11% survival benefit (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.81-0.97; P = .01).Conclusions and relevanceIn this cohort study, receipt of perichemotherapy antibiotics was associated with improved survival among patients treated with gemcitabine, but not fluorouracil, suggesting that antibiotics may modulate bacteria-mediated gemcitabine resistance and have the potential to improve PDAC outcomes.