Dataset Information

Antiinflammatory effects of aprepitant coadministration with cART regimen containing ritonavir in HIV-infected adults.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:HIV-infected individuals, even well controlled with combined antiretroviral therapy (cART), have systemic inflammation and comorbidities. Substance P (SP) is an undecapeptide, which mediates neurotransmission and inflammation through its cognate neurokinin 1 receptor (NK1R). Plasma SP levels are elevated in HIV-infected individuals. The FDA-approved antiemetic aprepitant, an NK1R antagonist, has anti-HIV effects and antiinflammatory actions. We evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics, and antiinflammatory properties of aprepitant in HIV-positive individuals receiving cART. METHODS:We conducted a phase 1B study of 12 HIV-positive individuals on a ritonavir-containing regimen (HIV viral load less than 40 copies/ml and CD4 > 400 cells/?l). Participants received open-label aprepitant 375 mg per day for 28 days and were followed for an additional 30 days. Changes in plasma levels of proinflammatory markers were assessed using flow cytometry, ELISA, luminex, and SOMAscan assays. RESULTS:The mean peak aprepitant plasma concentration was 30.7 ± 15.3 ?g/ml at day 14 and 23.3 ± 12.3 ?g/ml at day 28. Aprepitant treatment resulted in decreased plasma SP levels and affected 176 plasma proteins (56 after FDR) and several metabolic pathways, including inflammation and lipid metabolism. No change in soluble CD163 was observed. Aprepitant treatment was associated with a moderate increases in total and HDL cholesterol and affected select hematologic and metabolic markers, which returned to baseline levels 30 days after aprepitant treatment was stopped. There were 12 mild and 10 moderate adverse events (AE). CONCLUSIONS:Aprepitant is safe and well tolerated. The antiinflammatory properties of aprepitant make it a possible adjunctive therapy for comorbid conditions associated with HIV infection. TRIAL REGISTRATION:ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02154360). FUNDING:This research was funded by NIH UO1 MH090325, P30 MH097488, and PO1 MH105303.

SUBMITTER: Spitsin S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5841871 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Antiinflammatory effects of aprepitant coadministration with cART regimen containing ritonavir in HIV-infected adults.

Spitsin Sergei S Tebas Pablo P Barrett Jeffrey S JS Pappa Vasiliki V Kim Deborah D Taylor Deanne D Evans Dwight L DL Douglas Steven D SD

JCI insight 20171005 19

<h4>Background</h4>HIV-infected individuals, even well controlled with combined antiretroviral therapy (cART), have systemic inflammation and comorbidities. Substance P (SP) is an undecapeptide, which mediates neurotransmission and inflammation through its cognate neurokinin 1 receptor (NK1R). Plasma SP levels are elevated in HIV-infected individuals. The FDA-approved antiemetic aprepitant, an NK1R antagonist, has anti-HIV effects and antiinflammatory actions. We evaluated the safety, pharmacoki ...[more]

PMID: 28978797

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeEfavirenz-based combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) is associated with neuropsychiatric adverse events. We investigated the time to onset, duration, clinical implications, impact of pharmacogenetic variations, and anti-tuberculosis co-treatment on efavirenz-associated neuropsychiatric manifestations.MethodsProspective cohort study of cART naïve HIV patients with or without tuberculosis (HIV-TB) co-infection treated with efavirenz-based cART. Rifampicin-based anti-tuberculosis therapy was initiated 4 weeks prior to efavirenz-based cART in HIV-TB patients. Data on demographic, clinical, laboratory, and a 29-item questionnaire on neuropsychiatric manifestations were collected for 16 weeks after cART initiation. Genotyping for CYP2B6, CYP3A5, SLCO1B1, and ABCB1 and quantification of efavirenz plasma concentration were done on the 4th and 16th week.ResultsData from 458 patients (243 HIV-only and 215 HIV-TB) were analyzed. Overall incidence of neuropsychiatric manifestations was 57.6% being higher in HIV-only (66.7%) compared to HIV-TB patients (47.4%) (p < 0.01). HIV-only patients were more symptomatic, with proportionately higher grades of manifestations compared to HIV-TB patients. Median time to manifestations was 1 week after cART initiation in HIV-only and 6 weeks after anti-TB (i.e., 2 weeks after cART initiation) in HIV-TB patients. HIV-only patients had significantly higher efavirenz plasma concentrations at 4 weeks after cART compared to HIV-TB patients. No association of sex or genotype was seen in relation to neuropsychiatric manifestations. Risk for neuropsychiatric manifestations was three times more in HIV-only patients compared to HIV-TB (p < 0.01).ConclusionsIncidence of neuropsychiatric manifestations during early initiation of efavirenz-based cART is high in Tanzanian HIV patients. Risk of neuropsychiatric manifestations is lower in HIV patients co-treated with rifampicin containing anti-TB compared to those treated with efavirenz-based cART only.

Project description:BackgroundNevirapine-based antiretroviral therapy is the predominant (and often the only) regimen available for children in resource-limited settings. Nevirapine resistance after exposure to the drug for prevention of maternal-to-child human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) transmission is common, a problem that has led to the recommendation of ritonavir-boosted lopinavir in such settings. Regardless of whether there has been prior exposure to nevirapine, the performance of nevirapine versus ritonavir-boosted lopinavir in young children has not been rigorously established.MethodsIn a randomized trial conducted in six African countries and India, we compared the initiation of HIV treatment with zidovudine, lamivudine, and either nevirapine or ritonavir-boosted lopinavir in HIV-infected children 2 to 36 months of age who had no prior exposure to nevirapine. The primary end point was virologic failure or discontinuation of treatment by study week 24.ResultsA total of 288 children were enrolled; the median percentage of CD4+ T cells was 15%, and the median plasma HIV type 1 (HIV-1) RNA level was 5.7 log(10) copies per milliliter. The percentage of children who reached the primary end point was significantly higher in the nevirapine group than in the ritonavir-boosted lopinavir group (40.8% vs. 19.3%; P<0.001). Among the nevirapine-treated children with virologic failure for whom data on resistance were available, more than half (19 of 32) had resistance at the time of virologic failure. In addition, the time to a protocol-defined toxicity end point was shorter in the nevirapine group (P=0.04), as was the time to death (P=0.06).ConclusionsOutcomes were superior with ritonavir-boosted lopinavir among young children with no prior exposure to nevirapine. Factors that may have contributed to the suboptimal results with nevirapine include elevated viral load at baseline, selection for nevirapine resistance, background regimen of nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors, and the standard ramp-up dosing strategy. The results of this trial present policymakers with difficult choices. (Funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and others; P1060 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00307151.).

Project description:BackgroundAlbuvirtide (ABT), a fusion inhibitor against human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, has good efficacy and tolerability for HIV treatment. However, there is a paucity of data regarding ABT-based regimen as second-line therapy. This current study evaluated the efficacy and safety of switching to ABT + ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (LPV/r) treatment in a cohort of HIV-infected individuals who failed initial treatment.MethodsThis retrospective comparative cohort study included patients who failed initial treatment and switched to either ABT + LPV/r (the ABT group) or two nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) + LPV/r (the NRTI group) between November 2019 and December 2020 in the People's Hospital of Zhaojue County in Liangshan Yi Autonomous Prefecture, China. All individuals were followed up from baseline to 12 weeks after conversion, or until the patient developed unacceptable toxic effects or was loss of follow-up. The proportion of patients who achieved virological suppression (viral load <50 copies/mL) at week 12 was considered a primary efficacy endpoint. Safety outcomes included the incidence of adverse events and laboratory abnormalities. All participants underwent resistance testing before regimen conversion. The linear regression model was applied to evaluate the association of CD4+ T cell count with the patient's clinical characteristics.ResultsA total of 71 patients were included in this study, the two groups were comparable at baseline in terms of age, sex, CD4+ T cell count, and viral load. The suppression of HIV-1 RNA to levels <50 copies/mL was achieved in 82.4% (28/31) and 29.7% (11/34) of patients in the ABT group and the NRTI group, respectively (P<0.001). Older age (P=0.016) and higher alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels (P=0.038), but not rescue regimen, were associated with attenuated CD4+ T cell recovery. Most adverse events mild in severity, with abdominal pain as the most reported event in two groups (26.8%, 19/71), and no severe adverse events were detected.ConclusionsConversion to ABT + LPV/r therapy appears to be an effective and safe strategy. This treatment regimen has great potential to be generalized in the HIV-infected population, although further testing in a larger patient population is required to verify these results.

Dataset Information

Antiinflammatory effects of aprepitant coadministration with cART regimen containing ritonavir in HIV-infected adults.

Publications

Antiinflammatory effects of aprepitant coadministration with cART regimen containing ritonavir in HIV-infected adults.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets