Dataset Information

What is the value of fibre-endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) in neurological patients? A cross-sectional hospital-based registry study.

ABSTRACT:

Objectives

Fibre-endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) to detect dysphagia is gaining more and more importance as a diagnostic tool. Therefore, we have investigated the impact of FEES in neurological patients in a clinical setting.

Design

Cross-sectional hospital-based registry.

Setting

Primary acute care in a neurological department of a German university hospital.

Participants

241patients with various neurological diseases who underwent FEES procedure.

Primary and secondary outcome measures

Dysphagia and related comorbidities.

Results

267 FEES were performed in 241 patients with various neurological diagnoses. Dysphagia was diagnosed in 68.9% of the patients. In only 33.1% of the patients, appropriate oral diet was chosen prior to FEES. A relevant dysphagia occurred more often in patients with structural brain lesions (83.1% vs 65.3%, P=0.001), patients with dysphagia had a longer hospitalisation (median 18 (IQR 12-30) vs 15 days (IQR 9.75-22.75), P=0.005) and had a higher mortality (8.4% vs 1.3%, P=0.041). When the oral diet was changed, we observed a lower pneumonia rate (36% vs 50%, P=0.051) and a lower mortality (3.7% vs 11.3%, P=0.043) in comparison to no change of oral diet. A restriction of oral diet was identified more often in older patients (median 75 years (IQR 66.3-82 years) vs median 72 years (IQR 60-79 years), P=0.01) and in patients with structural brain lesions (86.8% vs 73.1%, P=0.05).

Conclusion

On clinical investigation, dysphagia was misjudged for the majority of the patients. FEES might help to compensate this drawback, revising the diet regime in nearly 70% of the patients.

SUBMITTER: Braun T

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5855308 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

What is the value of fibre-endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) in neurological patients? A cross-sectional hospital-based registry study.

Braun Tobias T Juenemann Martin M Viard Maxime M Meyer Marco M Fuest Sven S Reuter Iris I Kaps Manfred M Prosiegel Mario M Tanislav Christian C

BMJ open 20180306 3

<h4>Objectives</h4>Fibre-endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) to detect dysphagia is gaining more and more importance as a diagnostic tool. Therefore, we have investigated the impact of FEES in neurological patients in a clinical setting.<h4>Design</h4>Cross-sectional hospital-based registry.<h4>Setting</h4>Primary acute care in a neurological department of a German university hospital.<h4>Participants</h4>241patients with various neurological diseases who underwent FEES procedure.<h4>Prim ...[more]

PMID: 29511010

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:Diagnosing dysphagia in acute stroke patients is crucial, as this comorbidity determines morbidity and mortality; we therefore investigated the impact of flexible nasolaryngeal endoscopy (FEES) in acute stroke patients. METHODS:The FEES investigation as performed in acute stroke patients treated at a large university hospital, allocated as a standard procedure for all patients suspected of dysphagia. We correlated our findings with baseline data, disability status, pneumonia, duration of hospitalisation, necessity for mechanical ventilation and treatment on the intensive care unit. The study was designed as a cross-sectional hospital-based registry. RESULTS:We investigated 152 patients. The median age was 73; 94 were male. Ischemic stroke was diagnosed in 125 patients (82.2%); 27 (17.8%) suffered intracerebral haemorrhage. Oropharyngeal dysphagia was diagnosed in 72.4% of the patients, and was associated with higher stroke severity on admission (median NIHSS 11 [IQR 6-17] vs. 7 [4-12], p?=?.013; median mRS 5 [IQR 4-5] vs. 4 [IQR 3-5], p?=?.012). Short-term mortality was higher among patients diagnosed with dysphagia (7.2% vs. 0%, p?=?.107). FEES examinations revealed that only 30.9% of the patients had an oral diet appropriate for their swallowing abilities. A change of oral diet was associated with a better outcome at discharge (mRS; p?=?.006), less need of mechanical ventilation (p?=?.028), shorter period of hospitalisation (p?=?.044), and lower rates of pneumonia (p?=?.007) and mortality (p?=?.011). CONCLUSION:Due to the inability of clinical assessments to detect silent aspiration, FEES might be better suited to identify stroke patients at risk and may contribute to a better functional outcome and lower rates of pneumonia and mortality. Our findings also point to a low awareness of dysphagia, even in a specialised stroke centre. FEES in acute stroke patients helps to adjust the oral diet for the vast majority of stroke patients (69.1%) based on their swallowing abilities, potentially avoiding severe complications.

Project description:PurposeThe Dynamic Imaging Grade of Swallowing Toxicity (DIGEST) is a scale to quantify the severity of pharyngeal dysphagia in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients. This study (1) described the training process of the observers for DIGEST in fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES), (2) determined observer agreement on the DIGEST in FEES, (3) explored the effect of bolus consistency on observer agreement, and 4) explored criterion validity of the DIGEST in FEES.MethodsTwenty-seven dysphagic HNC patients were enrolled. Two observers completed a training program for DIGEST in FEES. Observer agreement on the Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS), percentage of pharyngeal residue (PPR), and DIGEST grades was determined using linearly weighted Cohen's kappa coefficient (κ).ResultsDue to insufficient observer agreement after the first measurement attempt, additional training was organized using an elaborated manual with descriptions of the visuoperceptual variables, thereby improving observer agreement. Intraobserver agreement was almost perfect on the PAS (κ = 0.86-0.88) and PPR (κ = 0.84-0.86). Interobserver agreement was substantial on the PAS (κ = 0.78), almost perfect on the PPR (κ = 0.82), substantial on the safety grade (κ = 0.64), almost perfect on the efficiency grade (κ = 0.85), and substantial on the summary grade (κ = 0.71). Bolus consistency had an effect on observer agreement. A significant correlation was found between DIGEST efficiency grade and EAT-10.ConclusionThe DIGEST showed to be a reproducible measurement for FEES in terms of observer agreement. However, agreement between novice observers on the DIGEST was only reached after specific observer-tailored training. Observer agreement should be analyzed by taking bolus consistency into account during training, as this might affect the interpretation of the outcome. A manual with well-defined descriptions can optimize the reproducibility of DIGEST measurements.

Project description:BackgroundIn Canada, family physicians are permitted to charge patient fees for administrative services that are not covered by the public health insurance program, such as prescription renewals outside of an office visit, and completion of forms and sick notes. The objective of this study was to estimate the proportion of Ontario family physicians who offer various fee structures (i.e., à la carte, annual block fees for all uninsured services rendered or no charge) for uninsured administrative services.MethodsThis was a cross-sectional telephone survey conducted from April to July 2019 of a random sample of family physicians licensed to practise in Ontario. We excluded physicians with missing contact information or additional specialties, or whose primary practice was outside of Ontario, with a walk-in clinic, with an emergency department, or with an organization that cared for a specific population (e.g., nursing home) or did not provide care (e.g., insurance company). We categorized the geographic location of practices as large urban centre (population > 100 000), small to medium centre (population 1000-99 999) or rural area. We calculated survey weights to account for nonresponse and to ensure representativeness of the sample by geographic area and payment model.ResultsAmong the 221 physicians who met the inclusion criteria, the telephone was not answered at 42 practices, and the contact information was incorrect for 13, resulting in a sample of 166 physicians (response rate 75.1%). The majority of practices reported that they charged fees for uninsured services: 97 (58.3%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 50.6-65.8) charged à la carte, and 33 (20.3%, 95% CI 14.8-27.3) offered patients the option to pay an annual block fee; 19 (11.4%, 95% CI 7.4-17.3) charged no fees. Fee structures varied by geographic area but not physician payment model.InterpretationThe use of à la carte and annual block fees for uninsured administrative services was commonly reported by a sample of Ontario family physicians. Further research is needed to examine the prevalence of patient payment of fees for uninsured services, patient and physician perceptions of fees, and concordance with regulatory guidance.

Project description:BackgroundChronic hepatitis C infection is a major public health concern, with a high burden in Sub-Saharan Africa. There is growing evidence that chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection causes neurological complications. This study aimed at assessing the prevalence and factors associated with neurological manifestations in chronic hepatitis C patients.MethodsThrough a cross-sectional design, a semi-structured questionnaire was used to collect data from consecutive chronic HCV infected patients attending the outpatient gastroenterology unit of the Douala General Hospital (DGH). Data collection was by interview, patient record review (including HCV RNA quantification, HCV genotyping and the assessment of liver fibrosis and necroinflammatory activity), clinical examination complemented by 3 tools; Neuropathic pain diagnostic questionnaire, Brief peripheral neuropathy screen and mini mental state examination score. Data were analysed using Statistical package for social sciences version 20 for windows.ResultsOf the 121 chronic hepatitis C patients (51.2% males) recruited, 54.5% (95% Confidence interval: 46.3%, 62.8%) had at least one neurological manifestation, with peripheral nervous system manifestations being more common (50.4%). Age ≥ 55 years (Adjusted Odds Ratio: 4.82, 95%CI: 1.02-18.81, p = 0.02), longer duration of illness (AOR: 1.012, 95%CI: 1.00-1.02, p = 0.01) and high viral load (AOR: 3.40, 95% CI: 1.20-9.64, p = 0.02) were significantly associated with neurological manifestations. Peripheral neuropathy was the most common neurological manifestation (49.6%), presenting mainly as sensory neuropathy (47.9%). Age ≥ 55 years (AOR: 6.25, 95%CI: 1.33-29.08, p = 0.02) and longer duration of illness (AOR: 1.01, 1.00-1.02, p = 0.01) were significantly associated with peripheral neuropathy.ConclusionOver half of the patients with chronic hepatitis C attending the DGH have a neurological manifestation, mainly presenting as sensory peripheral neuropathy. Routine screening of chronic hepatitis C patients for peripheral neuropathy is therefore necessary, with prime focus on those with older age and longer duration of illness.

Dataset Information

What is the value of fibre-endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) in neurological patients? A cross-sectional hospital-based registry study.

Objectives

Design

Setting

Participants

Primary and secondary outcome measures

Results

Conclusion

Publications

What is the value of fibre-endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) in neurological patients? A cross-sectional hospital-based registry study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets