Dataset Information

Protein-protein interaction specificity is captured by contact preferences and interface composition.

ABSTRACT: Motivation:Large-scale computational docking will be increasingly used in future years to discriminate protein-protein interactions at the residue resolution. Complete cross-docking experiments make in silico reconstruction of protein-protein interaction networks a feasible goal. They ask for efficient and accurate screening of the millions structural conformations issued by the calculations. Results:We propose CIPS (Combined Interface Propensity for decoy Scoring), a new pair potential combining interface composition with residue-residue contact preference. CIPS outperforms several other methods on screening docking solutions obtained either with all-atom or with coarse-grain rigid docking. Further testing on 28 CAPRI targets corroborates CIPS predictive power over existing methods. By combining CIPS with atomic potentials, discrimination of correct conformations in all-atom structures reaches optimal accuracy. The drastic reduction of candidate solutions produced by thousands of proteins docked against each other makes large-scale docking accessible to analysis. Availability and implementation:CIPS source code is freely available at http://www.lcqb.upmc.fr/CIPS. Contact:alessandra.carbone@lip6.fr. Supplementary information:Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

SUBMITTER: Nadalin F

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5860360 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Protein-protein interaction specificity is captured by contact preferences and interface composition.

Nadalin Francesca F Carbone Alessandra A

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 20180201 3

<h4>Motivation</h4>Large-scale computational docking will be increasingly used in future years to discriminate protein-protein interactions at the residue resolution. Complete cross-docking experiments make in silico reconstruction of protein-protein interaction networks a feasible goal. They ask for efficient and accurate screening of the millions structural conformations issued by the calculations.<h4>Results</h4>We propose CIPS (Combined Interface Propensity for decoy Scoring), a new pair pot ...[more]

PMID: 29028884

Similar Datasets

Project description:MotivationPrediction of protein-protein interaction has become an important part of systems biology in reverse engineering the biological networks for better understanding the molecular biology of the cell. Although significant progress has been made in terms of prediction accuracy, most computational methods only predict whether two proteins interact but not their interacting residues-the information that can be very valuable for understanding the interaction mechanisms and designing modulation of the interaction. In this work, we developed a computational method to predict the interacting residue pairs-contact matrix for interacting protein domains, whose rows and columns correspond to the residues in the two interacting domains respectively and whose values (1 or 0) indicate whether the corresponding residues (do or do not) interact.ResultsOur method is based on supervised learning using support vector machines. For each domain involved in a given domain-domain interaction (DDI), an interaction profile hidden Markov model (ipHMM) is first built for the domain family, and then each residue position for a member domain sequence is represented as a 20-dimension vector of Fisher scores, characterizing how similar it is as compared with the family profile at that position. Each element of the contact matrix for a sequence pair is now represented by a feature vector from concatenating the vectors of the two corresponding residues, and the task is to predict the element value (1 or 0) from the feature vector. A support vector machine is trained for a given DDI, using either a consensus contact matrix or contact matrices for individual sequence pairs, and is tested by leave-one-out cross validation. The performance averaged over a set of 115 DDIs collected from the 3 DID database shows significant improvement (sensitivity up to 85%, and specificity up to 85%), as compared with a multiple sequence alignment-based method (sensitivity 57%, and specificity 78%) previously reported in the literature.Supplementary informationSupplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Project description:BackgroundMost proteins function by interacting with other molecules. Their interaction interfaces are highly conserved throughout evolution to avoid undesirable interactions that lead to fatal disorders in cells. Rational drug discovery includes computational methods to identify the interaction sites of lead compounds to the target molecules. Identifying and classifying protein interaction interfaces on a large scale can help researchers discover drug targets more efficiently.DescriptionWe introduce a large-scale protein domain interaction interface database called InterPare http://interpare.net. It contains both inter-chain (between chains) interfaces and intra-chain (within chain) interfaces. InterPare uses three methods to detect interfaces: 1) the geometric distance method for checking the distance between atoms that belong to different domains, 2) Accessible Surface Area (ASA), a method for detecting the buried region of a protein that is detached from a solvent when forming multimers or complexes, and 3) the Voronoi diagram, a computational geometry method that uses a mathematical definition of interface regions. InterPare includes visualization tools to display protein interior, surface, and interaction interfaces. It also provides statistics such as the amino acid propensities of queried protein according to its interior, surface, and interface region. The atom coordinates that belong to interface, surface, and interior regions can be downloaded from the website.ConclusionInterPare is an open and public database server for protein interaction interface information. It contains the large-scale interface data for proteins whose 3D-structures are known. As of November 2004, there were 10,583 (Geometric distance), 10,431 (ASA), and 11,010 (Voronoi diagram) entries in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) containing interfaces, according to the above three methods. In the case of the geometric distance method, there are 31,620 inter-chain domain-domain interaction interfaces and 12,758 intra-chain domain-domain interfaces.

Project description:Proteins involved in interactions throughout the course of evolution tend to co-evolve and compensatory changes may occur in interacting proteins to maintain or refine such interactions. However, certain residue pair alterations may prove to be detrimental for functional interactions. Hence, determining co-evolutionary pairings that could be structurally or functionally relevant for maintaining the conservation of an inter-protein interaction is important. Inter-protein co-evolution analysis in several complexes utilizing multiple existing methodologies suggested that co-evolutionary pairings can occur in spatially proximal and distant regions in inter-protein interactions. Subsequently, the Co-Var (Correlated Variation) method based on mutual information and Bhattacharyya coefficient was developed, validated, and found to perform relatively better than CAPS and EV-complex. Interestingly, while applying the Co-Var measure and EV-complex program on a set of protein-protein interaction complexes, co-evolutionary pairings were obtained in interface and non-interface regions in protein complexes. The Co-Var approach involves determining high degree co-evolutionary pairings that include multiple co-evolutionary connections between particular co-evolved residue positions in one protein with multiple residue positions in the binding partner. Detailed analyses of high degree co-evolutionary pairings in protein-protein complexes involved in cancer metastasis suggested that most of the residue positions forming such co-evolutionary connections mainly occurred within functional domains of constituent proteins and substitution mutations were also common among these positions. The physiological relevance of these predictions suggested that Co-Var can predict residues that could be crucial for preserving functional protein-protein interactions. Finally, Co-Var web server (http://www.hpppi.iicb.res.in/ishi/covar/index.html) that implements this methodology identifies co-evolutionary pairings in intra and inter-protein interactions.

Project description:Proteins function in crowded cellular environments in which they must bind to specific target proteins but also avoid binding to many other off-target proteins. In large protein families this task is particularly challenging because many off-target proteins have very similar structures. How this specificity of physical protein-protein interactions in cellular networks is encoded and evolves is not very well understood. Here we address the question of specificity-encoding by comprehensively quantifying the effects of all mutations in one protein, JUN, on its binding to all other members of a protein family, the 54 human basic leucine zipper transcription factors. Fitting a global thermodynamic model to the data reveals that most affinity changing mutations equally affect JUN’s propensity to bind to all its interaction partners. Mutations that alter the specificity of binding are much rarer. These specificity-altering mutations are, however, distributed throughout the JUN interaction interface. JUN’s interaction specificity is encoded by both positive determinants that promote on-target interactions and negative determinants that prevent off-target interactions. Indeed, about half of the specificity-defining residues in JUN have dual functions and both promote on-target binding and prevent off-target binding. Whereas nearly all mutations that alter specificity are pleiotropic and also alter the affinity of binding to all interaction partners, the converse is not true with mutations outside of the interface able to tune affinity without affecting specificity. Our results provide the first global view of how mutations in a protein affect binding to all its potential interaction partners and reveal the distributed encoding of specificity and affinity in an interaction interface. They also show how the modular architecture of coiled-coils provides an elegant solution to the challenge of optimising specificity and affinity in a large protein family.

Dataset Information

Protein-protein interaction specificity is captured by contact preferences and interface composition.

Publications

Protein-protein interaction specificity is captured by contact preferences and interface composition.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets