Dataset Information

Depression and chest pain in patients with coronary artery disease.

ABSTRACT: Depression is common in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and is associated with more frequent chest pain. It is however unclear whether this is due to differences in underlying CAD severity. We sought to determine [1] whether depressive symptoms are associated with chest pain independently of CAD severity, [2] whether improvement in depressive symptoms over time is associated with improvement in chest pain and [3] whether the impact of revascularization on chest pain differs between patients with and without depression.5158 patients (mean age 63±12years, 65% male, 20% African American) undergoing cardiac catheterization completed the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) and Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8) to assess angina severity and screen for depression, respectively, both at baseline and between 6 and 24months of follow-up. We found significant correlations between PHQ-8 scores and angina frequency (SAQ-AF, r=-0.28), physical limitation (SAQ-PL, r=-0.32) and disease perception (SAQ-DS r=-0.37, all P<0.001), which remained significant after adjustment for clinical characteristics, CAD severity, and anti-depressant use. Improvement in depressive symptoms at follow-up was associated with improvement in angina subscales (SAQ-AF ? 1.34, P<0.001), SAQ-PL ? 1.85, P<0.001), and SAQ-DS (? 2.12, P<0.001), independently of CAD severity or revascularization. Patients with depression who underwent revascularization had less improvement in chest pain frequency than those without depressive symptoms.Depression is associated with angina, independently of CAD severity. Patients with depression may not derive as adequate symptomatic benefit from revascularization as those without. Whether treatment of underlying depression improves chest pain needs to be further studied.

SUBMITTER: Hayek SS

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5881400 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Depression and chest pain in patients with coronary artery disease.

Hayek Salim S SS Ko Yi-An YA Awad Mosaab M Del Mar Soto Andrea A Ahmed Hina H Patel Keyur K Yuan Michael M Maddox Spencer S Gray Brandon B Hajjari Jamal J Sperling Laurence L Shah Amit A Vaccarino Viola V Quyyumi Arshed A AA

International journal of cardiology 20161223

<h4>Background</h4>Depression is common in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and is associated with more frequent chest pain. It is however unclear whether this is due to differences in underlying CAD severity. We sought to determine [1] whether depressive symptoms are associated with chest pain independently of CAD severity, [2] whether improvement in depressive symptoms over time is associated with improvement in chest pain and [3] whether the impact of revascularization on chest pai ...[more]

PMID: 28041701

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveTo evaluate the diagnostic performance of the Marburg Heart Score (MHS), INTERCHEST, Gencer rule, Bruins Slot rule and compare these with unaided clinical judgement in patients with chest pain in urgent primary care.DesignRetrospective, cohort study.SettingRegional primary care facility responsible for out-of-hours primary care for a quarter-million people in the Netherlands.ParticipantsConsecutive patients aged ≥18 years who were evaluated for chest pain.Main outcome measuresDiscriminatory ability (C-statistic), sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV/NPV). The reference standard involved a composite endpoint of the occurrence of death, acute coronary syndrome or coronary revascularisation (=major adverse cardiac events; MACE) up to 6 weeks after initial contact.ResultsA total of 664 patients were included, of whom 4.8% (n=32) had a MACE event. C-statistics for MHS, INTERCHEST, Gencer and Bruins Slot rule were: 0.77 (95% CI 0.69 to 0.84), 0.85 (95% CI 0.78 to 0.92), 0.72 (95% CI 0.63 to 0.81) and 0.72 (95% CI 0.63 to 0.81), respectively. Optimal diagnostic accuracy was found for MHS ≥2 (sensitivity=81.3%, specificity=67.1%, PPV=11.1%, NPV=98.6%), INTERCHEST ≥2 (sensitivity=87.5%, specificity=78.8%, PPV=17.3%, NPV=99.1%), Gencer ≥2 (sensitivity=84.4%, specificity=37.8%, PPV=6.4%, NPV=98.0%) and Bruins Slot≥2 (sensitivity=90.6%, specificity=40.8%, PPV=7.2%, NPV=98.9%). Physicians referred 157 patients (23.6%) and missed 6 out of 32 MACEs (sensitivity=81.3%, specificity=79.3%, PPV=16.6%, NPV=98.8%). Using INTERCHEST with a referral threshold of ≥2 points, 4 MACEs would have been missed and 162 patients (24.4%) referred. The other risk scores resulted in far higher referral rates.ConclusionWhile available risk scores have reasonable to good discriminatory properties, they do not outperform unaided clinical judgment for evaluating chest pain in urgent primary care. Only the INTERCHEST score may slightly improve risk stratification.

Dataset Information

Depression and chest pain in patients with coronary artery disease.

Publications

Depression and chest pain in patients with coronary artery disease.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets