Project description:Stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has a dismal prognosis, with only 15-20% of patients alive at 5?years after concomitant chemo-radiotherapy, which represents the standard treatment. Targeting immune-checkpoint inhibitors represents a standard option for advanced NSCLC. Improvements in understanding of the immune profile of NSCLC has led to the development of immunotherapeutic strategies, including inhibitory molecules responsible for abrogating an anticancer immune response such as programmed cell-death 1 and programmed cell-death ligand 1. A recently published phase III trial (PACIFIC) showed for the first time an improved overall survival in stage III NSCLC patients with consolidative durvalumab. The aim of this review is to summarize and discuss the clinical evidence for the use of durvalumab in stage III NSCLC, with a brief overview on future perspectives in this setting.
Project description:BackgroundThis study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of durvalumab as a treatment option for patients with inoperable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) from healthcare and partial societal perspectives in Vietnam.MethodA lifetime partitioned survival model was used to evaluate the costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) associated with consolidation durvalumab in comparison with the standard of care alone. Local costs and utilities were incorporated into the model. In the base-case analysis, no discount was applied to the acquisition cost of durvalumab. Scenario-based, one-way and probabilistic-sensitivity analyses were conducted.ResultsThe base-case analysis revealed that the intervention resulted in an increase of 1.38 life years or 1.08 QALYs for patients, but the intervention was not deemed cost-effective from either perspective in the base-case analysis. However, with a 70% reduction in the durvalumab acquisition cost, the intervention was observed to be cost-effective when evaluated from a healthcare perspective and when examining the undiscounted results from a partial societal standpoint.ConclusionThis study provides evidence regarding the cost-effectiveness of durvalumab for the treatment of inoperable stage III NSCLC in Vietnam for various scenarios. The intervention was not cost-effective at full acquisition cost, but it is important to acknowledge that cost-effectiveness arguments alone cannot solely guide decision-makers in Vietnam; other criteria, such as budget impact and ethical concerns, are crucial factors to consider in decision-making processes.
Project description:BackgroundDurvalumab consolidation is associated with improved survival following concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Given the heterogeneity of stage III NSCLC patients, in this study we evaluated the efficacy and safety of durvalumab in the real-world setting.MethodUnresectable stage III NSCLC patients were retrospectively studied: one cohort received CCRT, another had CCRT-durvalumab. Primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), secondary endpoints were relapse rate and safety. In CCRT-durvalumab cohort, association between blood markers with survival and pneumonitis risk were analyzed.ResultsA total of 84 patients were enrolled: 45 received CCRT, and 39 received CCRT-durvalumab. Median PFS was 17.5 months for CCRT-durvalumab and 8.9 months for CCRT-alone (HR 0.47, p = 0.038). Median OS was not-reached for CCRT-durvalumab and 22.3 months for CCRT-alone (HR 0.35, p = 0.024). Both EGFR-positive and wild-type (WT) patients had numerically improved PFS with durvalumab consolidation compared to CCRT-alone, 17.5 versus 10.9 months and 11.8 versus 6.63 months, respectively (interaction p-value = 0.608). Grade 2+ pneumonitis was detected in 25% of patients in the durvalumab cohort. Most pneumonitis occurred at 3.5 weeks after durvalumab initiation. Baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) ≥ 3 and ≥5 were associated with shorter PFS with durvalumab. Week 6 platelet-lymphocyte-ratio ≥ 180 was associated with a lower risk of pneumonitis.ConclusionIn this real-world study, durvalumab consolidation post CCRT was associated with a statistically significant improvement in PFS and OS. Effect of durvalumab on PFS was not modified by EGFR status. Active surveillance for pneumonitis is crucial. Baseline NLR may help to predict the benefit of treatment with durvalumab.
Project description:Despite adequate treatment, 50% of stage III locally advanced inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients have a locoregional relapse. Local control on early stages on the contrary, is as high as 85-90% with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). The addition of SBRT to conventional chemoradiation or its use in monotherapy in stage III NSCLC is a novel strategy to decrease local failure that has been explored by various authors. This is a systematic review of studies using SBRT in inoperable stage III NSCLC. Search results obtained 141 articles of which only 6 original studies were pointed as relevant. Three of these studies were prospective, of which 2 were phase I dose-scalation studies and remaining 3 were retrospective. In summary, SBRT outcomes on 134 patients were included. Median dose in the SBRT treatment was 22.5 Gy in 2 to 7 fractions. Obtained global toxicity was 3.7% grade 5 and 14.17% grade 3. Dose-escalation studies proposed a 2 fraction SBRT schedule of 20-24 Gy, obtaining a 78% local control rate at 1 year and an OS of 67%. Initial improvement in local control with this innovative therapeutic strategy has led to ongoing phase II and III clinical trials that will evaluate the efficiency of SBRT in stage III NSCLC clinical scenario.
Project description:PurposeIt is unclear whether time from radiation therapy (RT) completion to durvalumab initiation influences the outcomes of stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with definitive chemoradiation and adjuvant durvalumab.Methods and materialsUsing the US Veterans Health Administration database, we retrospectively identified 728 patients with stage III NSCLC treated with definitive chemoradiation who started durvalumab within 120 days of radiation completion. Time between the last radiation treatment and first durvalumab infusion was analyzed in multivariable Cox regression models for the primary outcomes of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), adjusting for baseline patient and disease characteristics. The primary analysis used a 120-day landmark, measuring OS and PFS from 120 days after radiation completion.ResultsAmong 728 patients, the median time from RT completion to durvalumab start was 41 days (interquartile range 30-58). In multivariable Cox regression, time from RT completion to durvalumab start showed no association with PFS (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.01 per week, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.98-1.04, P = .4) or OS (aHR 1.02 per week, 95% CI 0.98-1.06, P = .3). Starting durvalumab ≤14 days after RT was also not associated with improved PFS or OS. Results were robust in sensitivity analyses varying analytical technique.ConclusionsTiming of durvalumab initiation up to 120 days after RT completion is not associated with PFS or OS in this real-world patient cohort.
Project description:BackgroundDurvalumab following concurrent chemoradiotherapy is standard treatment for unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer based on the results of the PACIFIC trial. Based on trial criteria, not all patients are eligible for durvalumab in routine clinical practice.MethodsWe evaluated eligibility for durvalumab in a real-world clinical setting and the impact of eligibility on outcomes. Consecutive patients treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy at two tertiary centers between January 2015 and June 2022 were assessed. Clinical characteristics and outcomes were evaluated based on eligibility criteria for the PACIFIC trial.ResultsA total of 126 patients were included. Seventy patients (56%) were eligible for durvalumab. Ineligibility was associated with shorter progression-free survival of 9.7 months versus 18.4 months (hazard ratio [HR] 0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.39-0.95, p = 0.029) and overall survival of 26.4 months versus 58.7 months (HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.28-0.80, p = 0.005). Common reasons for ineligibility were history of previous malignancy (32%) and progressive disease or death during chemoradiotherapy (25%). Ineligible patients who received durvalumab had similar outcomes to eligible patients who received durvalumab.ConclusionsIn a real-world cohort, adjuvant durvalumab is safe and beneficial in a substantial proportion of patients who would not have been eligible for the PACIFIC trial.
Project description:PurposeThe phase III PACIFIC trial compared durvalumab with placebo in patients with unresectable, stage III non-small-cell lung cancer and no disease progression after concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Consolidation durvalumab was associated with significant improvements in the primary end points of overall survival (OS; stratified hazard ratio [HR], 0.68; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.87; P = .00251) and progression-free survival (PFS [blinded independent central review; RECIST v1.1]; stratified HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.65; P < .0001), with manageable safety. We report updated, exploratory analyses of survival, approximately 5 years after the last patient was randomly assigned.MethodsPatients with WHO performance status 0 or 1 (any tumor programmed cell death-ligand 1 status) were randomly assigned (2:1) to durvalumab (10 mg/kg intravenously; administered once every 2 weeks for 12 months) or placebo, stratified by age, sex, and smoking history. Time-to-event end point analyses were performed using stratified log-rank tests. Medians and landmark survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.ResultsSeven hundred and nine of 713 randomly assigned patients received durvalumab (473 of 476) or placebo (236 of 237). As of January 11, 2021 (median follow-up, 34.2 months [all patients]; 61.6 months [censored patients]), updated OS (stratified HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.89; median, 47.5 v 29.1 months) and PFS (stratified HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.68; median, 16.9 v 5.6 months) remained consistent with the primary analyses. Estimated 5-year rates (95% CI) for durvalumab and placebo were 42.9% (38.2 to 47.4) versus 33.4% (27.3 to 39.6) for OS and 33.1% (28.0 to 38.2) versus 19.0% (13.6 to 25.2) for PFS.ConclusionThese updated analyses demonstrate robust and sustained OS and durable PFS benefit with durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy. An estimated 42.9% of patients randomly assigned to durvalumab remain alive at 5 years and 33.1% of patients randomly assigned to durvalumab remain alive and free of disease progression, establishing a new benchmark for standard of care in this setting.
Project description:Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) represents a consolidated treatment option for patients with medically inoperable early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The clinical evidence accumulated in the past decade supports its use as an alternative to surgery with comparable survival outcomes. Due to its limited toxicity, SBRT is also applicable to elderly patients with very poor baseline pulmonary function or other severe comorbidities. Recent comparative studies in operable patients raised the issue of the possible use of SBRT also for this subgroup, with quite promising results that still should be fully confirmed by prospective trials with long-term follow-up. Aim of this review is to summarize and discuss the major studies conducted over the years on SBRT and to provide data on the efficacy and toxicity of this radiotherapy technique for stage I NSCLC. Technical aspects and quality of life related issues are also discussed, with the goal to provide information on the current role and limitations of SBRT in clinical practice.
Project description:BackgroundSalvage surgery following definitive radiotherapy or systemic treatment has become a feasible treatment option in selected patients with advanced initially unresectable non-small cell lung cancer. Recent clinical trials of neoadjuvant treatment have showed that surgery following immuno-chemotherapy is safely performed. Here, we present the first case of salvage surgery following immuno-chemotherapy with concurrent definitive radiotherapy for advanced lung large cell carcinoma.Case presentationA 44-year male was admitted to our hospital for salvage surgery. Ten months prior to this administration, he had been diagnosed with unresectable large cell carcinoma with malignant pericardial effusion (clinical stage IVA/T3N2M1A; no driver-gene alteration) originating from the right upper lobe (RUL). Due to rapid intrabronchial tumor growth causing severe dyspnea, emergency bronchial stenting in the right main bronchus using an expandable metallic stent had been performed. Thereafter, he had received immuno-chemotherapy with concurrent definitive radiotherapy. Despite dramatic radiographic response, he had suffered from persistent and refractory Pseudomonas aeruginosa lung infection associated with bronchial stent placement. As pericardial effusion had disappeared and no distant metastasis had developed, he was diagnosed with a potentially curable disease and was referred to our hospital. An extended sleeve resection was successfully performed, and pathological sections revealed that pathologic complete response was achieved with immuno-chemo-radiotherapy. The patient received no subsequent treatment, and is alive without tumor recurrence at 8 months after surgery.ConclusionsSalvage surgery following immuno-chemotherapy with concurrent definitive radiotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer may be feasible in selected patients, and may be considered as a treatment option to control local disease.