Dataset Information

Timing of Adjuvant Durvalumab Initiation Is Not Associated With Outcomes in Stage III Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

It is unclear whether time from radiation therapy (RT) completion to durvalumab initiation influences the outcomes of stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with definitive chemoradiation and adjuvant durvalumab.

Methods and materials

Using the US Veterans Health Administration database, we retrospectively identified 728 patients with stage III NSCLC treated with definitive chemoradiation who started durvalumab within 120 days of radiation completion. Time between the last radiation treatment and first durvalumab infusion was analyzed in multivariable Cox regression models for the primary outcomes of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), adjusting for baseline patient and disease characteristics. The primary analysis used a 120-day landmark, measuring OS and PFS from 120 days after radiation completion.

Results

Among 728 patients, the median time from RT completion to durvalumab start was 41 days (interquartile range 30-58). In multivariable Cox regression, time from RT completion to durvalumab start showed no association with PFS (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.01 per week, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.98-1.04, P = .4) or OS (aHR 1.02 per week, 95% CI 0.98-1.06, P = .3). Starting durvalumab ≤14 days after RT was also not associated with improved PFS or OS. Results were robust in sensitivity analyses varying analytical technique.

Conclusions

Timing of durvalumab initiation up to 120 days after RT completion is not associated with PFS or OS in this real-world patient cohort.

SUBMITTER: Bryant AK

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9018488 | biostudies-literature | 2022 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Timing of Adjuvant Durvalumab Initiation Is Not Associated With Outcomes in Stage III Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

Bryant Alex K AK Sankar Kamya K Strohbehn Garth W GW Zhao Lili L Elliott David D Daniel Victoria V Ramnath Nithya N Green Michael D MD

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics 20220201 1

<h4>Purpose</h4>It is unclear whether time from radiation therapy (RT) completion to durvalumab initiation influences the outcomes of stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with definitive chemoradiation and adjuvant durvalumab.<h4>Methods and materials</h4>Using the US Veterans Health Administration database, we retrospectively identified 728 patients with stage III NSCLC treated with definitive chemoradiation who started durvalumab within 120 days of radiation completion. Time be ...[more]

PMID: 35115216

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeThe phase III PACIFIC trial compared durvalumab with placebo in patients with unresectable, stage III non-small-cell lung cancer and no disease progression after concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Consolidation durvalumab was associated with significant improvements in the primary end points of overall survival (OS; stratified hazard ratio [HR], 0.68; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.87; P = .00251) and progression-free survival (PFS [blinded independent central review; RECIST v1.1]; stratified HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.65; P < .0001), with manageable safety. We report updated, exploratory analyses of survival, approximately 5 years after the last patient was randomly assigned.MethodsPatients with WHO performance status 0 or 1 (any tumor programmed cell death-ligand 1 status) were randomly assigned (2:1) to durvalumab (10 mg/kg intravenously; administered once every 2 weeks for 12 months) or placebo, stratified by age, sex, and smoking history. Time-to-event end point analyses were performed using stratified log-rank tests. Medians and landmark survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.ResultsSeven hundred and nine of 713 randomly assigned patients received durvalumab (473 of 476) or placebo (236 of 237). As of January 11, 2021 (median follow-up, 34.2 months [all patients]; 61.6 months [censored patients]), updated OS (stratified HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.89; median, 47.5 v 29.1 months) and PFS (stratified HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.68; median, 16.9 v 5.6 months) remained consistent with the primary analyses. Estimated 5-year rates (95% CI) for durvalumab and placebo were 42.9% (38.2 to 47.4) versus 33.4% (27.3 to 39.6) for OS and 33.1% (28.0 to 38.2) versus 19.0% (13.6 to 25.2) for PFS.ConclusionThese updated analyses demonstrate robust and sustained OS and durable PFS benefit with durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy. An estimated 42.9% of patients randomly assigned to durvalumab remain alive at 5 years and 33.1% of patients randomly assigned to durvalumab remain alive and free of disease progression, establishing a new benchmark for standard of care in this setting.

Project description:BackgroundIn the PACIFIC trial, durvalumab significantly improved progression-free and overall survival (PFS/OS) versus placebo, with manageable safety, in unresectable, stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients without progression after chemoradiotherapy (CRT). We report exploratory analyses of outcomes by tumour cell (TC) programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression.Patients and methodsPatients were randomly assigned (2:1) to intravenous durvalumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks or placebo ≤12 months, stratified by age, sex, and smoking history, but not PD-L1 status. Where available, pre-CRT samples were tested for PD-L1 expression (immunohistochemistry) and scored at pre-specified (25%) and post hoc (1%) TC cut-offs. Treatment-effect hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated from unstratified Cox proportional hazards models (Kaplan-Meier-estimated medians).ResultsIn total, 713 patients were randomly assigned, 709 of whom received at least 1 dose of study treatment durvalumab (n = 473) or placebo (n = 236). Some 451 (63%) were PD-L1-assessable: 35%, 65%, 67%, 33%, and 32% had TC ≥25%, <25%, ≥1%, <1%, and 1%-24%, respectively. As of 31 January 2019, median follow-up was 33.3 months. Durvalumab improved PFS versus placebo (primary-analysis data cut-off, 13 February 2017) across all subgroups [HR, 95% confidence interval (CI); medians]: TC ≥25% (0.41, 0.26-0.65; 17.8 versus 3.7 months), <25% (0.59, 0.43-0.82; 16.9 versus 6.9 months), ≥1% (0.46, 0.33-0.64; 17.8 versus 5.6 months), <1% (0.73, 0.48-1.11; 10.7 versus 5.6 months), 1%-24% [0.49, 0.30-0.80; not reached (NR) versus 9.0 months], and unknown (0.59, 0.42-0.83; 14.0 versus 6.4 months). Durvalumab improved OS across most subgroups (31 January 2019 data cut-off; HR, 95% CI; medians): TC ≥ 25% (0.50, 0.30-0.83; NR versus 21.1 months), <25% (0.89, 0.63-1.25; 39.7 versus 37.4 months), ≥1% (0.59, 0.41-0.83; NR versus 29.6 months), 1%-24% (0.67, 0.41-1.10; 43.3 versus 30.5 months), and unknown (0.60, 0.43-0.84; 44.2 versus 23.5 months), but not <1% (1.14, 0.71-1.84; 33.1 versus 45.6 months). Safety was similar across subgroups.ConclusionsPFS benefit with durvalumab was observed across all subgroups, and OS benefit across all but TC <1%, for which limitations and wide HR CI preclude robust conclusions.

Project description:BackgroundDurvalumab is an anti-PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitor approved for consolidation therapy for patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after chemoradiation. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the association between the degree of tumor PD-L1 expression and outcomes of stage III NSCLC patients treated with durvalumab.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of all the patients who received durvalumab between July 2017 and July 2019 at our facilities and were diagnosed with or progressed to stage III NSCLC before durvalumab consolidation. Patients were divided into groups based on the degree of PD-L1 expression: <1%, 1-49%, and 50-100%. Overall survival and progression-free survival were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and the Multivariate Cox proportional hazard model was used to assess the effect of PD-L1 expression level on OS and PFS, adjusting for age and gender.ResultsWe identified 121 patients with stage III NSCLC that underwent durvalumab consolidation. Of them, 29.8% had PD-L1 expression of 50-100%, 24.8% had PD-L1 expression of 1-49%, and 27.3% had PD-L1 expression of <1%, while 18.2% were not tested for PD-L1 expression. The rate of cancer progression in the group with 50-100% PD-L1 expression was 16.7% compared to 60% in the 1-49% expression group and 54.6% in the <1% expression group, and the 1-year survival rates were higher in the 50-100% group (97%) compared to the 1-49% group and the <1% group (73% and 78%, respectively; P=0.028). Survival analysis via Kaplan-Meier revealed a significant difference in both PFS (P<0.0001) and OS (P<0.028) based on the extent of PD-L1 expression. Multivariate analysis revealed that a PD-L1 expression >50% was the only factor that was significantly associated with improved PFS (HR =0.205, P=0.0004) and OS (HR =0.339, P=0.04).ConclusionsOur study demonstrated that patients whose tumors had >50% PD-L1 expression had significantly longer progression-free survival and overall survival than those with lower PD-L1 expression. This suggests that the degree of tumor PD-L1 expression may play a role in predicting benefit from durvalumab for these patients.

Dataset Information

Timing of Adjuvant Durvalumab Initiation Is Not Associated With Outcomes in Stage III Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

Purpose

Methods and materials

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Timing of Adjuvant Durvalumab Initiation Is Not Associated With Outcomes in Stage III Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets