Dataset Information

Distinguishing mirtrons from canonical miRNAs with data exploration and machine learning methods.

ABSTRACT: Mirtrons are non-canonical microRNAs encoded in introns the biogenesis of which starts with splicing. They are not processed by Drosha and enter the canonical pathway at the Exportin-5 level. Mirtrons are much less evolutionary conserved than canonical miRNAs. Due to the differences, canonical miRNA predictors are not applicable to mirtron prediction. Identification of differences is important for designing mirtron prediction algorithms and may help to improve the understanding of mirtron functioning. So far, only simple, single-feature comparisons were reported. These are insensitive to complex feature relations. We quantified miRNAs with 25 features and showed that it is impossible to distinguish the two miRNA species using simple thresholds on any single feature. However, when using the Principal Component Analysis mirtrons and canonical miRNAs are grouped separately. Moreover, several methodologically diverse machine learning classifiers delivered high classification performance. Using feature selection algorithms we found features (e.g. bulges in the stem region), previously reported divergent in two classes, that did not contribute to improving classification accuracy, which suggests that they are not biologically meaningful. Finally, we proposed a combination of the most important features (including Guanine content, hairpin free energy and hairpin length) which convey a specific pattern, crucial for identifying mirtrons.

SUBMITTER: Rorbach G

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5953923 | biostudies-literature | 2018 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Distinguishing mirtrons from canonical miRNAs with data exploration and machine learning methods.

Rorbach Grzegorz G Unold Olgierd O Konopka Bogumil M BM

Scientific reports 20180515 1

Mirtrons are non-canonical microRNAs encoded in introns the biogenesis of which starts with splicing. They are not processed by Drosha and enter the canonical pathway at the Exportin-5 level. Mirtrons are much less evolutionary conserved than canonical miRNAs. Due to the differences, canonical miRNA predictors are not applicable to mirtron prediction. Identification of differences is important for designing mirtron prediction algorithms and may help to improve the understanding of mirtron functi ...[more]

PMID: 29765080

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundAlternative splicing (AS) plays critical roles in generating protein diversity and complexity. Dysregulation of AS underlies the initiation and progression of tumors. Machine learning approaches have emerged as efficient tools to identify promising biomarkers. It is meaningful to explore pivotal AS events (ASEs) to deepen understanding and improve prognostic assessments of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) via machine learning algorithms.MethodRNA sequencing data and AS data were extracted from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database and TCGA SpliceSeq database. Using several machine learning methods, we identified 24 pairs of LUAD-related ASEs implicated in splicing switches and a random forest-based classifiers for identifying lymph node metastasis (LNM) consisting of 12 ASEs. Furthermore, we identified key prognosis-related ASEs and established a 16-ASE-based prognostic model to predict overall survival for LUAD patients using Cox regression model, random survival forest analysis, and forward selection model. Bioinformatics analyses were also applied to identify underlying mechanisms and associated upstream splicing factors (SFs).ResultsEach pair of ASEs was spliced from the same parent gene, and exhibited perfect inverse intrapair correlation (correlation coefficient = - 1). The 12-ASE-based classifier showed robust ability to evaluate LNM status of LUAD patients with the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) more than 0.7 in fivefold cross-validation. The prognostic model performed well at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years in both the training cohort and internal test cohort. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression indicated the prognostic model could be used as an independent prognostic factor for patients with LUAD. Further analysis revealed correlations between the prognostic model and American Joint Committee on Cancer stage, T stage, N stage, and living status. The splicing network constructed of survival-related SFs and ASEs depicts regulatory relationships between them.ConclusionIn summary, our study provides insight into LUAD researches and managements based on these AS biomarkers.

Dataset Information

Distinguishing mirtrons from canonical miRNAs with data exploration and machine learning methods.

Publications

Distinguishing mirtrons from canonical miRNAs with data exploration and machine learning methods.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets