Dataset Information

Distinguishing Discoid and Centripetal Levallois methods through machine learning.

ABSTRACT: In this paper, we apply Machine Learning (ML) algorithms to study the differences between Discoid and Centripetal Levallois methods. For this purpose, we have used experimentally knapped flint flakes, measuring several parameters that have been analyzed by seven ML algorithms. From these analyses, it has been possible to demonstrate the existence of statistically significant differences between Discoid products and Centripetal Levallois products, thus contributing with new data and a new method to this traditional debate. The new approach enabled differentiating the blanks created by both knapping methods with an accuracy >80% using only ten typometric variables. The most relevant variables were maximum length, width to the 25%, 50% and 75% of the flake length, external and internal platform angles, maximum width and number of dorsal scars. This study also demonstrates the advantages of the application of multivariate ML methods to lithic studies.

SUBMITTER: Gonzalez-Molina I

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7757815 | biostudies-literature | 2020

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Distinguishing Discoid and Centripetal Levallois methods through machine learning.

González-Molina Irene I Jiménez-García Blanca B Maíllo-Fernández José-Manuel JM Baquedano Enrique E Domínguez-Rodrigo Manuel M

PloS one 20201223 12

In this paper, we apply Machine Learning (ML) algorithms to study the differences between Discoid and Centripetal Levallois methods. For this purpose, we have used experimentally knapped flint flakes, measuring several parameters that have been analyzed by seven ML algorithms. From these analyses, it has been possible to demonstrate the existence of statistically significant differences between Discoid products and Centripetal Levallois products, thus contributing with new data and a new method ...[more]

PMID: 33362257

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background: Microglia plays complex and crucial roles in multiple sclerosis (MS). This study aimed to explore the biological significance of microglia-associated genes in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) . Methods: Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were screened with six machine learning (ML) methods, which were also utilized to validate the microglia-associated DEGs in three public databases. ceRNA and Protein–protein interaction (PPI) network analyses were utilized to identify the interaction of the 6 novel biomarkers with other molecules. Then, CIBERSORT and single-sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA) were employed to quantify the relative abundance of each immune cell infiltration, respectively. qRT-PCR was performed to test the expression of key DEGs in murine models. Results: A total of 247 DEmRNA, 499 DElncRNAs and 269 DEcircRNAs were identified. With screening strategy of five ML algorithms, 6 DEmRNAs were obtained including NGP, HIST1H2BJ, PBLD1, MBLN3, CD180 and F10. Then the 6 DEmRNAs were used as a multigene signature to construct models to differentiate EAE from normal microglia, and AUC value for each model was greater than 0.8. The diagnostic value of these 6 DEmRNAs were identified and further verified by qRT-PCR. Then, differential expression for five out of these 6 DEmRNAs, namely NGP, HIST1H2BJ, PBLD1, MBLN3, and F10 were confirmed. Using PPI analysis, DEmRNAs frequently interacting with transcription factors (TFs), potential drugs and RBPs were identified. With immune cell infiltration analyses, we found EAE microglia presented high levels of immune infiltration, especially Nature Killer (NK) cells and CD8+ T cells. We also reported circRNA (circRNA_00638) was predicted to bind to 76 RBPs. Conclusions: We identified and validated 6 novel microglia related genes and developed a multigene signature with ML methods to confirm their ability to accurately diagnose and characterize biological alterations in EAE microglia. The six key DEmRNAs might also be latent targets for immunoregulatory therapy.

Project description:ObjectiveTo investigate the value of differential diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and non-hepatocellular carcinoma (non-HCC) based on CT and MR multiphase radiomics combined with different machine learning models and compare the diagnostic efficacy between different radiomics models.BackgroundPrimary liver cancer is one of the most common clinical malignancies, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common subtype of primary liver cancer, accounting for approximately 90% of cases. A clear diagnosis of HCC is important for the individualized treatment of patients with HCC. However, more sophisticated diagnostic modalities need to be explored.MethodsThis retrospective study included 211 patients with liver lesions: 97 HCC and 124 non-hepatocellular carcinoma (non-HCC) who underwent CT and MRI. Imaging data were used to obtain imaging features of lesions and radiomics regions of interest (ROI). The extracted imaging features were combined to construct different radiomics models. The clinical data and imaging features were then combined with radiomics features to construct the combined models. Support Vector Machine (SVM), K-nearest Neighbor (KNN), RandomForest (RF), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) six machine learning models were used for training. Five-fold cross-validation was used to train the models, and ROC curves were used to analyze the diagnostic efficacy of each model and calculate the accuracy rate. Model training and efficacy test were performed as before.ResultsStatistical analysis showed that some clinical data (gender and concomitant cirrhosis) and imaging features (presence of envelope, marked enhancement in the arterial phase, rapid contouring in the portal phase, uniform density/signal and concomitant steatosis) were statistical differences (P < 0.001). The results of machine learning models showed that KNN had the best diagnostic efficacy. The results of the combined model showed that SVM had the best diagnostic efficacy, indicating that the combined model (accuracy 0.824) had better diagnostic efficacy than the radiomics-only model.ConclusionsOur results demonstrate that the radiomic features of CT and MRI combined with machine learning models enable differential diagnosis of HCC and non-HCC (malignant, benign). The diagnostic model with dual radiomic had better diagnostic efficacy. The combined model was superior to the radiomic model alone.

Dataset Information

Distinguishing Discoid and Centripetal Levallois methods through machine learning.

Publications

Distinguishing Discoid and Centripetal Levallois methods through machine learning.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets