Dataset Information

Transfusion of fresh vs. older red blood cells in the context of infection.

ABSTRACT: The red blood cell (RBC) storage interval has been extended from less than a week to the current storage interval of 6-8 weeks. Regulatory criteria for extending storage rely upon a minimal degree of hemolysis and acceptable in vivo 24-h post transfusion recovery. Clinical studies of safety and efficacy have never been required. Concerns have arisen that RBC toward the end of storage develop a 'storage lesion' with previously unrecognized toxicity. Of the several mechanisms proposed, the bolus of iron delivered to macrophages as a result of hemolysis of stored RBC might pose a particular risk to patients with existing infections. We developed a canine model of pneumonia to compare the toxicity of stored RBC transfusion. We described increased mortality after transfusion of old RBC. We found that transfused older RBC increased mortality, in vivo hemolysis, circulating cell-free hemoglobin that scavenges nitric oxide, and elevations of non-transferrin bound and plasma labile iron. Disappearance of circulating iron correlated with increased mortality, worsening pulmonary function, and bacterial proliferation. Washing decreased the mortality associated with transfusing older RBC, but had the opposite effect on fresher blood. With low doses of bacteria, survival was unaffected by the age of blood, whereas high bacteria doses masked any effect of RBC age on mortality. Older RBC may have adverse effects, but the patient's clinical status, the age, volume and method of preparation of the RBC may be critical variables. Several mechanisms may account for this toxicity, but in the presence of bacterial infection, availability of iron likely plays a major role.

SUBMITTER: Klein H

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5967851 | biostudies-literature | 2015 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Transfusion of fresh vs. older red blood cells in the context of infection.

Klein H H Natanson C C Flegel W W

ISBT science series 20150413 Suppl 1

The red blood cell (RBC) storage interval has been extended from less than a week to the current storage interval of 6-8 weeks. Regulatory criteria for extending storage rely upon a minimal degree of hemolysis and acceptable <i>in vivo</i> 24-h post transfusion recovery. Clinical studies of safety and efficacy have never been required. Concerns have arisen that RBC toward the end of storage develop a 'storage lesion' with previously unrecognized toxicity. Of the several mechanisms proposed, the ...[more]

PMID: 29805474

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceHemostatic resuscitation has been shown to be beneficial for patients with trauma, but there is little evidence that it is equally beneficial for bleeding patients without trauma. The practice of a high transfusion ratio of fresh frozen plasma (FFP) to red blood cells (RBCs) has spread to other surgical and medical fields.ObjectiveTo identify whether ratio-based resuscitation in patients without trauma is associated with improved survival.Design, setting, and participantsThis study is a retrospective review of all massive transfusions provided in an urban academic hospital from January 1, 2009, through December 31, 2012. Massive transfusion was defined as the transfusion of at least 10 U of RBCs in the first 24 hours after a patient's admission to the operating room, emergency department, or intensive care unit. All patients who received massive transfusions within the study period and survived more than 30 minutes after hospital arrival were counted (n=865). Patients were grouped into those with trauma and those without trauma. Sources of data included the Research Patient Data Registry, patients' medical records, and blood bank records. All data collection occurred between April 26, 2013, and April 26, 2015. Data analysis took place from April 27, 2015, and June 22, 2016.Main outcomes and measuresExamination of FFP:RBC transfusion ratios for patients without trauma.ResultsThere were 865 massive transfusion events that occurred within 4 years, transfusing 16 569 U of RBCs, 13 933 U of FFP, 5228 U of cryoprecipitate, and 22 635 U of platelets. Most of these transfusions were received by patients without trauma (767 [88.7%]), by men (582 [67.3%]), and for intraoperative bleeding (544 [62.9%]). The FFP:RBC ratios of survivors and nonsurvivors were nearly identical: the ratio for survivors was 1:1.5 (interquartile range [IQR], 1:1.1-1:2.2) and for nonsurvivors was 1:1.4 (IQR, 1:1.1-1:1.9; P = .43). Among the 767 patients without trauma, there was no difference in the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for 30-day mortality when comparing the high FFP:RBC ratio vs the low FFP:RBC ratio subgroups (aOR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.72-1.70; P = .65). In vascular surgery, the aOR for death favored the high FFP:RBC ratio subgroup (aOR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.03-0.79; P = .02). However, in general surgery and medicine, the aOR for death favored the low FFP:RBC ratio subgroup; general surgery: aOR, 4.27 (95% CI, 1.28-14.22; P = .02); medicine: aOR, 8.48 (95% CI, 1.50-47.75; P = .02).Conclusions and relevanceHigh FFP:RBC transfusion ratios are applied mostly to patients without trauma, who account for nearly 90% of all massive transfusion events. Thirty-day survival was not significantly different in patients who received a high FFP:RBC ratio compared with those who received a low ratio.

Dataset Information

Transfusion of fresh vs. older red blood cells in the context of infection.

Publications

Transfusion of fresh vs. older red blood cells in the context of infection.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure