Dataset Information

Increases in Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Among Adolescent and Young Adult Males in the United States, 2011-2016.

ABSTRACT: In the United States, human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination has been recommended for females since 2006 and males since 2011. We assessed temporal trends in HPV vaccine coverage (defined as receipt of ?1 dose) among 9-26-year-old participants in the 2011-2016 National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys. While coverage increased overall, from 37.7% to 45.7%, among females (adjusted prevalence difference [aPD], 7.1%; 95% confidence interval [CI], .1%-13.7%), there was no change among female adolescents aged 9-17 years. For males, coverage increased overall, from 7.8% to 27.4% (aPD, 18.8%; 95% CI, 14.1%-23.5%), and among every stratum of age, race/ethnicity, health insurance status, poverty level, and immigration status (P ? .05). The increase in HPV vaccine coverage observed among males is encouraging, but coverage remains below national targets for both males and females.

SUBMITTER: Patel EU

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5989630 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Increases in Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Among Adolescent and Young Adult Males in the United States, 2011-2016.

Patel Eshan U EU Grabowski M Kate MK Eisenberg Anna L AL Packman Zoe R ZR Gravitt Patti E PE Tobian Aaron A R AAR

The Journal of infectious diseases 20180601 1

In the United States, human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination has been recommended for females since 2006 and males since 2011. We assessed temporal trends in HPV vaccine coverage (defined as receipt of ≥1 dose) among 9-26-year-old participants in the 2011-2016 National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys. While coverage increased overall, from 37.7% to 45.7%, among females (adjusted prevalence difference [aPD], 7.1%; 95% confidence interval [CI], .1%-13.7%), there was no change among female ...[more]

PMID: 29584878

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundHuman papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination has been routinely recommended at age 11-12 years in the United States for females since 2006 and males since 2011. Coverage can be estimated using self/parent-reported HPV vaccination collected in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) for a wider age range than other national surveys. We assessed vaccination coverage in 2015-2016, temporal trends by age, and the validity of self/parent-reported vaccination status.MethodsParticipants aged 9-59 years completed an interview collecting demographic and vaccination information. Weighted coverage was estimated for two-year NHANES cycles by age group for 2007-2008 to 2015-2016 for females (N = 14318) and 2011-2012 to 2015-2016 for males (N = 7847). Temporal trends in coverage were assessed from 2007-2008 to 2011-2012 for females and from 2011-2012 to 2015-2016 for both sexes. Sensitivity and specificity of self/parent-reported vaccination were assessed using provider-verified vaccination records from a pilot study in 14-29 year-olds.ResultsIn 2015-2016, ≥1 dose coverage among females was highest in 14-19 (54.7%) and 20-24 (56.0%) year-olds and lower in successively older age groups. Among males, ≥1 dose coverage was highest in 14-19 year-olds (39.5%) and lower at older ages. Coverage was similar in 9-13 year-old females and males. Between 2007-2008 and 2011-2012, there were increases among females younger than 30 years. Between 2011-2012 and 2015-2016, there were increases among female age groups including 20-39 year-olds; male coverage increased among ages 9-13, 14-19, and 20-24 years. Self/parent-reported receipt of ≥1 dose had a sensitivity and specificity of 87.0% and 83.3%. Performance was lower for 3 doses.ConclusionsWhile overall HPV vaccination coverage remains low, it is higher in females than males, except in 9-13 year-olds. There have been increases in coverage among many age groups, but coverage has stalled in younger females. Adequate validity was demonstrated for self/parent-reported vaccination of ≥1 dose, but not 3 doses, in a pilot study.

Project description:ImportanceThe prevalence of diabetes among Hispanic and Asian American subpopulations in the United States is unknown.ObjectiveTo estimate racial/ethnic differences in the prevalence of diabetes among US adults 20 years or older by major race/ethnicity groups and selected Hispanic and non-Hispanic Asian subpopulations.Design, setting, and participantsNational Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys, 2011-2016, cross-sectional samples representing the noninstitutionalized, civilian, US population. The sample included adults 20 years or older who had self-reported diagnosed diabetes during the interview or measurements of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), and 2-hour plasma glucose (2hPG).ExposuresRace/ethnicity groups: non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, Hispanic and Hispanic subgroups (Mexican, Puerto Rican, Cuban/Dominican, Central American, and South American), non-Hispanic Asian and non-Hispanic Asian subgroups (East, South, and Southeast Asian), and non-Hispanic other.Main outcomes and measuresDiagnosed diabetes was based on self-reported prior diagnosis. Undiagnosed diabetes was defined as HbA1c 6.5% or greater, FPG 126 mg/dL or greater, or 2hPG 200 mg/dL or greater in participants without diagnosed diabetes. Total diabetes was defined as diagnosed or undiagnosed diabetes.ResultsThe study sample included 7575 US adults (mean age, 47.5 years; 52% women; 2866 [65%] non-Hispanic white, 1636 [11%] non-Hispanic black, 1952 [15%] Hispanic, 909 [6%] non-Hispanic Asian, and 212 [3%] non-Hispanic other). A total of 2266 individuals had diagnosed diabetes; 377 had undiagnosed diabetes. Weighted age- and sex-adjusted prevalence of total diabetes was 12.1% (95% CI, 11.0%-13.4%) for non-Hispanic white, 20.4% (95% CI, 18.8%-22.1%) for non-Hispanic black, 22.1% (95% CI, 19.6%-24.7%) for Hispanic, and 19.1% (95% CI, 16.0%-22.1%) for non-Hispanic Asian adults (overall P < .001). Among Hispanic adults, the prevalence of total diabetes was 24.6% (95% CI, 21.6%-27.6%) for Mexican, 21.7% (95% CI, 14.6%-28.8%) for Puerto Rican, 20.5% (95% CI, 13.7%-27.3%) for Cuban/Dominican, 19.3% (95% CI, 12.4%-26.1%) for Central American, and 12.3% (95% CI, 8.5%-16.2%) for South American subgroups (overall P < .001). Among non-Hispanic Asian adults, the prevalence of total diabetes was 14.0% (95% CI, 9.5%-18.4%) for East Asian, 23.3% (95% CI, 15.6%-30.9%) for South Asian, and 22.4% (95% CI, 15.9%-28.9%) for Southeast Asian subgroups (overall P = .02). The prevalence of undiagnosed diabetes was 3.9% (95% CI, 3.0%-4.8%) for non-Hispanic white, 5.2% (95% CI, 3.9%-6.4%) for non-Hispanic black, 7.5% (95% CI, 5.9%-9.1%) for Hispanic, and 7.5% (95% CI, 4.9%-10.0%) for non-Hispanic Asian adults (overall P < .001).Conclusions and relevanceIn this nationally representative survey of US adults from 2011 to 2016, the prevalence of diabetes and undiagnosed diabetes varied by race/ethnicity and among subgroups identified within the Hispanic and non-Hispanic Asian populations.

Dataset Information

Increases in Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Among Adolescent and Young Adult Males in the United States, 2011-2016.

Publications

Increases in Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Among Adolescent and Young Adult Males in the United States, 2011-2016.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets