Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Improvement of quality of 3D printed objects by elimination of microscopic structural defects in fused deposition modeling.


ABSTRACT: Additive manufacturing with fused deposition modeling (FDM) is currently optimized for a wide range of research and commercial applications. The major disadvantage of FDM-created products is their low quality and structural defects (porosity), which impose an obstacle to utilizing them in functional prototyping and direct digital manufacturing of objects intended to contact with gases and liquids. This article describes a simple and efficient approach for assessing the quality of 3D printed objects. Using this approach it was shown that the wall permeability of a printed object depends on its geometric shape and is gradually reduced in a following series: cylinder > cube > pyramid > sphere > cone. Filament feed rate, wall geometry and G-code-defined wall structure were found as primary parameters that influence the quality of 3D-printed products. Optimization of these parameters led to an overall increase in quality and improvement of sealing properties. It was demonstrated that high quality of 3D printed objects can be achieved using routinely available printers and standard filaments.

SUBMITTER: Gordeev EG 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5991691 | biostudies-literature | 2018

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Improvement of quality of 3D printed objects by elimination of microscopic structural defects in fused deposition modeling.

Gordeev Evgeniy G EG   Galushko Alexey S AS   Ananikov Valentine P VP  

PloS one 20180607 6


Additive manufacturing with fused deposition modeling (FDM) is currently optimized for a wide range of research and commercial applications. The major disadvantage of FDM-created products is their low quality and structural defects (porosity), which impose an obstacle to utilizing them in functional prototyping and direct digital manufacturing of objects intended to contact with gases and liquids. This article describes a simple and efficient approach for assessing the quality of 3D printed obje  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC5460192 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6696107 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10535423 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4400136 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8350970 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7221194 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5510088 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9685451 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9269528 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9257448 | biostudies-literature