Dataset Information

The effect of constraint on post damage in total knee arthroplasty: posterior stabilized vs posterior stabilized constrained inserts.

ABSTRACT: Posterior stabilized constrained (PSC) inserts are intended to provide greater varus-valgus and rotational constraint than conventional PS inserts. We determined whether the added constraint resulted in more damage to the post in PSC compared to PS inserts. Retrieved PSC inserts were matched to retrieved PS inserts from the same manufacturer according to patient age, body mass index, and length of implantation. Surface damage was visually assessed, and 3-D surface deviation from pristine was measured. Damage scores for the PSC posts were significantly greater than those of the PS posts. Surface deviation was significantly greater in the posterior and medial post regions of the PSC inserts. Based on short-term follow-up, our results suggest that added constraint is accompanied by greater polyethylene surface damage.

SUBMITTER: Konopka J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5994601 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

The effect of constraint on post damage in total knee arthroplasty: posterior stabilized vs posterior stabilized constrained inserts.

Konopka Joseph J Weitzler Lydia L Westrich Daniel D Wright Timothy M TM Westrich Geoffrey H GH

Arthroplasty today 20171206 2

Posterior stabilized constrained (PSC) inserts are intended to provide greater varus-valgus and rotational constraint than conventional PS inserts. We determined whether the added constraint resulted in more damage to the post in PSC compared to PS inserts. Retrieved PSC inserts were matched to retrieved PS inserts from the same manufacturer according to patient age, body mass index, and length of implantation. Surface damage was visually assessed, and 3-D surface deviation from pristine was mea ...[more]

PMID: 29896553

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundPosterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty requires an intercondylar notch to accommodate the cam housing that articulates with the tibial post to create femoral rollback required for deep flexion. The volume of bone resected for the intercondylar notch varies with implant design, and newer designs may accommodate high flexion with less bone resection.Questions/purposesThis study aims to analyze the bone volume and density resected from the intercondylar notch for three posterior stabilized implants from a single company: a Posterior Stabilized (PS) system, a Hi-Flex system (HF), and a rounded new box-reamer (RB) system and to further assess whether the newer RB with a cylindrical cutting tool would preserve more native bone.Materials and methodsUsing a computer model, the PS, HF, and RB femoral components were digitally implanted into CT scans of 19 cadaver femurs. Nine cadavers were fit with a size 4 implant, six with size 3, and four with a size 2. The volume of intercondylar bone resected digitally for femoral preparation was measured. Bone density was measured by CT scans in Hounsfield units (HU). A paired t test was used to compare the mean volume of bone resected for each implant.ResultsFor the size 4 femurs, the newer RB design removed 8% less intercondylar bone than the PS design (7,832 ± 501 vs. 8,547 ± 377 mm(3), p < 0.001) and 28% less bone than the HF design (7,832 ± 501 vs. 10,897 ± 444 mm(3), p < 0.001). The average HU for size 4 femurs for RB design was 427 ± 72 (PS = 399 ± 69, p < 0.001; HF = 379 ± 66, p < 0.001). For the size 3 femurs, the RB design removed 12% less intercondylar bone than the PS (6,664 ± 786 vs. 7,516 ± 648 mm(3), p < 0.001) and 27% less bone than the HF (6,664 ± 786 vs. 9,078 ± 713 mm(3), p < 0.001). HU for size 3 femurs for the RB design was 452 ± 70 (PS = 422 ± 53, p < 0.1; HF = 410 ± 59, p < 0.01). For the size 2 femurs, the RB design removed 5% less intercondylar bone than the PS (5,730 ± 552 vs. 6,009 ± 472 mm(3), p < 0.01) and 22% less bone than the HF (5,730 ± 552 vs. 7,380 ± 532 mm(3), p < 0.001). HU for size 2 femurs for the RB design was 430 ± 48 (PS = 408 ± 55, p < 0.01; HF = 385 ± 56, p < 0.01).ConclusionsThe newer RB design removes less bone from the intercondylar notch than the classic PS and HF designs in all sizes tested. The bone-conserving cuts incorporated into this newer implant design appear to preserve native bone without compromising design objectives.

Project description:PurposeStability in the sagittal plane, particularly regarding anterior cruciate ligament compensation, and postoperative functionality and satisfaction remain issues in total knee arthroplasty. Therefore, this prospective study compared the clinical outcomes between medial-pivot-based and posterior-stabilised total knee arthroplasty based on anterior translation and clinical scores.MethodsTo assess outcomes of total knee arthroplasty for varus osteoarthritis, the anterior translation distance of the tibia relative to the femur was measured at 30 and 60° of flexion using a KS measure Arthrometer at 6 months postoperatively. The 2011 Knee Society Score, Forgotten Joint Score, visual analogue scale for pain, and range of motion were assessed at 6 months and 1 year postoperatively. The correlations among each score, anterior translation distance, range of motion, and visual analogue scale score for pain were investigated.ResultsThe medial-pivot and posterior-stabilised groups comprised 70 and 51 patients, respectively. The medial-pivot group exhibited a significantly shorter anterior translation distance at 60° flexion than the posterior-stabilised group. Furthermore, the medial-pivot group achieved significantly better outcomes regarding the visual analogue scale for pain, 2011 Knee Society Score, and Forgotten Joint Score than the posterior-stabilised group. A significant negative correlation was observed between the anterior translation distance and the function score of the 2011 Knee Society Score, whereas a significant positive correlation was found between the anterior translation distance and flexion angle, and between the extension angle and score of the Forgotten Joint Score or 2011 Knee Society Score. Significant negative correlations were also found between the pain visual analogue scale and both the 2011 Knee Society Score and Forgotten Joint Score.ConclusionIn total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis, the medial-pivot group displayed a shorter anterior translation distance than the posterior-stabilised group at 6 months postoperatively. The visual analogue scale score for pain was also significantly lower in the medial-pivot group than that in the posterior-stabilised group at both 6 months and 1 year postoperatively. Because a correlation was observed between the anterior translation distance and the function score, medial-pivot-based total knee arthroplasty was considered to significantly improve postoperative function compared to posterior-stabilised total knee arthroplasty.

Dataset Information

The effect of constraint on post damage in total knee arthroplasty: posterior stabilized vs posterior stabilized constrained inserts.

Publications

The effect of constraint on post damage in total knee arthroplasty: posterior stabilized vs posterior stabilized constrained inserts.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets