Dataset Information

Comparison of pediatric allogeneic transplant outcomes using myeloablative busulfan with cyclophosphamide or fludarabine.

ABSTRACT: Busulfan combined with cyclophosphamide (BuCy) has long been considered a standard myeloablative conditioning regimen for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), including both nonmalignant conditions and myeloid diseases. Substituting fludarabine for cyclophosphamide (BuFlu) to reduce toxicity without an increase in relapse has been increasingly performed in children, but without comparison with BuCy. We retrospectively analyzed 1781 children transplanted from 2008 to 2014 to compare the effectiveness of BuCy with BuFlu. Nonmalignant and malignant disease populations were analyzed separately. Overall mortality was comparable for children with nonmalignant conditions who received BuFlu or BuCy (relative risk [RR], 1.14, P = .52). Lower incidences of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (P = .04), hemorrhagic cystitis (P = .04), and chronic graft-versus-host disease (P = .02) were observed after BuFlu, but the influence of the conditioning regimen could not be assessed by multivariate analysis because of the low frequency of these complications. Children transplanted for malignancies were more likely to receive BuFlu if they had higher hematopoietic cell transplantation-comorbidity index scores (P < .001) or their donor was unrelated and HLA-mismatched (P = .004). Nevertheless, there were no differences in transplant toxicities and comparable transplant-related mortality (RR, 1.2; P = .46), relapse (RR, 1.2; P = .15), and treatment failure (RR, 1.2; P = .12). BuFlu was associated with higher overall mortality (RR, 1.4; P = .008) related to inferior postrelapse survival (P = .001). Our findings demonstrated that outcomes after BuFlu are similar to those for BuCy for children, but for unclear reasons, those receiving BuFlu for malignancy may be at risk for shorter postrelapse survival.

SUBMITTER: Harris AC

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5998928 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Comparison of pediatric allogeneic transplant outcomes using myeloablative busulfan with cyclophosphamide or fludarabine.

Harris Andrew C AC Boelens Jaap J JJ Ahn Kwang Woo KW Fei Mingwei M Abraham Allistair A Artz Andrew A Dvorak Christopher C Frangoul Haydar H Freytes Cesar C Gale Robert Peter RP Hong Sanghee S Lazarus Hillard M HM Loren Alison A Mineishi Shin S Nishihori Taiga T O'Brien Tracey T Williams Kirsten K Pasquini Marcelo C MC Levine John E JE Levine John E JE

Blood advances 20180601 11

Busulfan combined with cyclophosphamide (BuCy) has long been considered a standard myeloablative conditioning regimen for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), including both nonmalignant conditions and myeloid diseases. Substituting fludarabine for cyclophosphamide (BuFlu) to reduce toxicity without an increase in relapse has been increasingly performed in children, but without comparison with BuCy. We retrospectively analyzed 1781 children transplanted from 2008 to 2014 to compa ...[more]

PMID: 29844205

Similar Datasets

Project description:Large, multicenter studies comparing commonly used reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) approaches in follicular lymphoma (FL) have not been performed. Using the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research database, we report the outcomes of the 2 most commonly used RIC approaches, fludarabine and busulfan (Flu/Bu) versus fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR) in FL patients. We evaluated 200 FL patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) who received RIC with either Flu/Bu (n?=?98) or FCR (n?=?102) during 2008 to 2014. All patients received peripheral blood grafts, and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis was limited to calcineurin inhibitor-based approaches. Median follow-up of survivors in the Flu/Bu and FCR groups was 48 months and 46 months, respectively. On univariate analysis in the Flu/Bu and FCR groups, the 3-year rates of nonrelapse mortality (11% versus 11%, P?=?.94), relapse/progression (18% versus 15%, P?=?.54), progression-free survival (PFS) (71% versus 74%, P?=?.65), and overall survival (OS) (73% versus 81%, P?=?.18) were not significantly different. On multivariate analysis no difference was seen between the FCR and Flu/Bu cohorts in terms of grades II to IV (relative risk [RR],?1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI],?.59 to 1.93; P?=?.84) or grades III to IV (RR,?1.18; 95% CI, .47 to 2.99; P?=?.72) acute GVHD, nonrelapse mortality (RR,?.83; 95% CI, .38 to 1.82; P?=?.64), relapse/progression (RR,?.99; 95% CI, .49 to 1.98; P?=?.97), PFS (RR,?.92; 95% CI, .55 to 1.54; P?=?.76), or OS (RR,?.70; 95% CI, .40 to 1.23; P?=?.21) risk. However, RIC with FCR was associated with a significantly reduced chronic GVHD risk (RR,?.52; 95% CI, .36 to .77; P?=?.001). RIC with either Flu/Bu or FCR in patients with FL undergoing allo-HCT provides excellent 3-year OS, with acceptable rates of nonrelapse mortality. FCR-based conditioning was associated with a lower risk of chronic GVHD.

Dataset Information

Comparison of pediatric allogeneic transplant outcomes using myeloablative busulfan with cyclophosphamide or fludarabine.

Publications

Comparison of pediatric allogeneic transplant outcomes using myeloablative busulfan with cyclophosphamide or fludarabine.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure