Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Sensitivity of pretargeted immunoPET using 68Ga-peptide to detect colonic carcinoma liver metastases in a murine xenograft model: Comparison with 18FDG PET-CT.


ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to compare the performances pretargeted immunoPET 68Ga-PETimaging (68Ga-pPET) with anti carcino-embryonic antigen (CEA) and anti-histamine-succinyl-glycine (HSG) recombinant humanized bispecific monoclonal antibody (TF2) and 68Ga-labeled HSG peptide (IMP288) to conventional 18FDG-PET in an orthotopic murine model of liver metastases of human colonic cancer.Hepatic tumor burden following intra-portal injection of luciferase-transfected LS174T cells in nude mice was confirmed using bioluminescence. One group of animals was injected intravenously with TF2 and with 68Ga-IMP288 24 hours later (n=8). Another group received 18FDG (n=8), and a third had both imaging modalities (n=7). PET acquisitions started 1 hour after injection of the radioconjugate. Biodistributions in tumors and normal tissues were assessed one hour after imaging.Tumor/organ ratios were significantly higher with 68Ga-pPET compared to 18FDG-PET (P<0.05) with both imaging and biodistribution data. 68Ga-pPET sensitivity for tumor detection was 67% vs. 31% with 18FDG PET (P=0.049). For tumors less than 200 mg, the sensitivity was 44% with 68Ga-pPET vs. 0% for 18FDG PET (P=0.031). A strong correlation was demonstrated between tumor uptakes measured on PET images and biodistribution analyses (r2=0.85).68Ga-pPET was more sensitive than 18FDG-PET for the detection of human colonic liver metastases in an orthotopic murine xenograft model. Improved tumor/organ ratios support the use of pretargeting method for imaging and therapy of CEA-expressing tumors.

SUBMITTER: Foubert F 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6007947 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Sensitivity of pretargeted immunoPET using <sup>68</sup>Ga-peptide to detect colonic carcinoma liver metastases in a murine xenograft model: Comparison with <sup>18</sup>FDG PET-CT.

Foubert Fanny F   Gouard Sébastien S   Saï-Maurel Catherine C   Chérel Michel M   Faivre-Chauvet Alain A   Goldenberg David M DM   Barbet Jacques J   Bailly Clément C   Bodet-Milin Caroline C   Carlier Thomas T   Kraeber-Bodéré Françoise F   Touchefeu Yann Y   Frampas Eric E  

Oncotarget 20180608 44


<h4>Purpose</h4>The aim of this study was to compare the performances pretargeted immunoPET <sup>68</sup>Ga-PETimaging (<sup>68</sup>Ga-pPET) with anti carcino-embryonic antigen (CEA) and anti-histamine-succinyl-glycine (HSG) recombinant humanized bispecific monoclonal antibody (TF2) and <sup>68</sup>Ga-labeled HSG peptide (IMP288) to conventional <sup>18</sup>FDG-PET in an orthotopic murine model of liver metastases of human colonic cancer.<h4>Methods</h4>Hepatic tumor burden following intra-po  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC6911626 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5649877 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7456572 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5845361 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7036891 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6581743 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5745571 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5300187 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5716866 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6318156 | biostudies-literature