Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
Irrational use of medicines is widespread in the South-East Asia Region (SEAR), where policy implementation to encourage quality use of medicines (QUM) is often low. The aim was to determine whether public-sector QUM is better in SEAR countries implementing essential medicines (EM) policies than in those not implementing them.Methods
Data on six QUM indicators and 25 EM policies were extracted from situational analysis reports of 20 country (2-week) visits made during 2010-2015. The average difference (as percent) for the QUM indicators between countries implementing versus not implementing specific policies was calculated. Policies associated with better (>?1%) QUM were included in regression of a composite QUM score versus total number of policies implemented.Results
Twenty-two policies were associated with better (>?1%) QUM. Twelve policies were associated with 3.6-9.5% significantly better use (p?2?=?0.50, p?ConclusionsCountry situational analyses allowed rapid data collection that showed EM policies are associated with better QUM. SEAR countries should implement all such policies.
SUBMITTER: Holloway KA
PROVIDER: S-EPMC6034320 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Jul
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Holloway Kathleen Anne KA Kotwani Anita A Batmanabane Gitanjali G Santoso Budiono B Ratanawijitrasin Sauwakon S Henry David D
BMC health services research 20180705 1
<h4>Background</h4>Irrational use of medicines is widespread in the South-East Asia Region (SEAR), where policy implementation to encourage quality use of medicines (QUM) is often low. The aim was to determine whether public-sector QUM is better in SEAR countries implementing essential medicines (EM) policies than in those not implementing them.<h4>Methods</h4>Data on six QUM indicators and 25 EM policies were extracted from situational analysis reports of 20 country (2-week) visits made during ...[more]