Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

19 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Nonparametric Two-Sample Tests of the Marginal Mark Distribution with Censored Marks.

ABSTRACT: Occasionally, investigators collect auxiliary marks at the time of failure in a clinical study. Because the failure event may be censored at the end of the follow-up period, these marked endpoints are subject to induced censoring. We propose two new families of two-sample tests for the null hypothesis of no difference in mark-scale distribution that allows for arbitrary associations between mark and time. One family of proposed tests is a nonparametric extension of an existing semi-parametric linear test of the same null hypothesis while a second family of tests is based on novel marked rank processes. Simulation studies indicate that the proposed tests have the desired size and possess adequate statistical power to reject the null hypothesis under a simple change of location in the marginal mark distribution. When the marginal mark distribution has heavy tails, the proposed rank-based tests can be nearly twice as powerful as linear tests.

SUBMITTER: Johnson BA

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6040226 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Publications

Nonparametric Two-Sample Tests of the Marginal Mark Distribution with Censored Marks.

Johnson Brent A BA

Scandinavian journal of statistics, theory and applications 20170216 2

Occasionally, investigators collect auxiliary marks at the time of failure in a clinical study. Because the failure event may be censored at the end of the follow-up period, these marked endpoints are subject to induced censoring. We propose two new families of two-sample tests for the null hypothesis of no difference in mark-scale distribution that allows for arbitrary associations between mark and time. One family of proposed tests is a nonparametric extension of an existing semi-parametric li ...[more]

PMID: 30008509

Similar Datasets

Robust multivariate nonparametric tests for detection of two-sample location shift in clinical trials.

Project description:This article presents and investigates performance of a series of robust multivariate nonparametric tests for detection of location shift between two multivariate samples in randomized controlled trials. The tests are built upon robust estimators of distribution locations (medians, Hodges-Lehmann estimators, and an extended U statistic) with both unscaled and scaled versions. The nonparametric tests are robust to outliers and do not assume that the two samples are drawn from multivariate normal distributions. Bootstrap and permutation approaches are introduced for determining the p-values of the proposed test statistics. Simulation studies are conducted and numerical results are reported to examine performance of the proposed statistical tests. The numerical results demonstrate that the robust multivariate nonparametric tests constructed from the Hodges-Lehmann estimators are more efficient than those based on medians and the extended U statistic. The permutation approach can provide a more stringent control of Type I error and is generally more powerful than the bootstrap procedure. The proposed robust nonparametric tests are applied to detect multivariate distributional difference between the intervention and control groups in the Thai Healthy Choices study and examine the intervention effect of a four-session motivational interviewing-based intervention developed in the study to reduce risk behaviors among youth living with HIV.

| S-EPMC5908204 | biostudies-literature

BALL DIVERGENCE: NONPARAMETRIC TWO SAMPLE TEST.

Project description:In this paper, we first introduce Ball Divergence, a novel measure of the difference between two probability measures in separable Banach spaces, and show that the Ball Divergence of two probability measures is zero if and only if these two probability measures are identical without any moment assumption. Using Ball Divergence, we present a metric rank test procedure to detect the equality of distribution measures underlying independent samples. It is therefore robust to outliers or heavy-tail data. We show that this multivariate two sample test statistic is consistent with the Ball Divergence, and it converges to a mixture of χ2 distributions under the null hypothesis and a normal distribution under the alternative hypothesis. Importantly, we prove its consistency against a general alternative hypothesis. Moreover, this result does not depend on the ratio of the two imbalanced sample sizes, ensuring that can be applied to imbalanced data. Numerical studies confirm that our test is superior to several existing tests in terms of Type I error and power. We conclude our paper with two applications of our method: one is for virtual screening in drug development process and the other is for genome wide expression analysis in hormone replacement therapy.

| S-EPMC6192286 | biostudies-literature

Comparing two correlated C indices with right-censored survival outcome: a one-shot nonparametric approach.

Project description:The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve is often used as a summary index of the diagnostic ability in evaluating biomarkers when the clinical outcome (truth) is binary. When the clinical outcome is right-censored survival time, the C index, motivated as an extension of area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, has been proposed by Harrell as a measure of concordance between a predictive biomarker and the right-censored survival outcome. In this work, we investigate methods for statistical comparison of two diagnostic or predictive systems, of which they could either be two biomarkers or two fixed algorithms, in terms of their C indices. We adopt a U-statistics-based C estimator that is asymptotically normal and develop a nonparametric analytical approach to estimate the variance of the C estimator and the covariance of two C estimators. A z-score test is then constructed to compare the two C indices. We validate our one-shot nonparametric method via simulation studies in terms of the type I error rate and power. We also compare our one-shot method with resampling methods including the jackknife and the bootstrap. Simulation results show that the proposed one-shot method provides almost unbiased variance estimations and has satisfactory type I error control and power. Finally, we illustrate the use of the proposed method with an example from the Framingham Heart Study.

| S-EPMC4314453 | biostudies-literature

Incorporating marginal covariate information in a nonparametric regression model for a sample of R x C tables.

Project description:Nonparametric regression models are proposed in the framework of ecological inference for exploratory modeling of disease prevalence rates adjusted for variables, such as age, ethnicity/race, and socio-economic status. Ecological inference is needed when a response variable and covariate are not available at the subject level because only summary statistics are available for the reporting unit, for example, in the form of R x C tables. In this article, only the marginal counts are assumed available in the sample of R x C contingency tables for modeling the joint distribution of counts. A general form for the ecological regression model is proposed, whereby certain covariates are included as a varying coefficient regression model, whereas others are included as a functional linear model. The nonparametric regression curves are modeled as splines fit by penalized weighted least squares. A data-driven selection of the smoothing parameter is proposed using the pointwise maximum squared bias computed from averaging kernels (explained by O'Sullivan, 1986, Statistical Science 1, 502-517). Analytic expressions for bias and variance are provided that could be used to study the rates of convergence of the estimators. Instead, this article focuses on demonstrating the utility of the estimators in a study of disparity in health outcomes by ethnicity/race.

| S-EPMC2722944 | biostudies-literature

Finite sample pointwise confidence intervals for a survival distribution with right-censored data.

Project description:We review and develop pointwise confidence intervals for a survival distribution with right-censored data for small samples, assuming only independence of censoring and survival. When there is no censoring, at each fixed time point, the problem reduces to making inferences about a binomial parameter. In this case, the recently developed beta product confidence procedure (BPCP) gives the standard exact central binomial confidence intervals of Clopper and Pearson. Additionally, the BPCP has been shown to be exact (gives guaranteed coverage at the nominal level) for progressive type II censoring and has been shown by simulation to be exact for general independent right censoring. In this paper, we modify the BPCP to create a 'mid-p' version, which reduces to the mid-p confidence interval for a binomial parameter when there is no censoring. We perform extensive simulations on both the standard and mid-p BPCP using a method of moments implementation that enforces monotonicity over time. All simulated scenarios suggest that the standard BPCP is exact. The mid-p BPCP, like other mid-p confidence intervals, has simulated coverage closer to the nominal level but may not be exact for all survival times, especially in very low censoring scenarios. In contrast, the two asymptotically-based approximations have lower than nominal coverage in many scenarios. This poor coverage is due to the extreme inflation of the lower error rates, although the upper limits are very conservative. Both the standard and the mid-p BPCP methods are available in our bpcp R package. Published 2016. This article is US Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

| S-EPMC4899279 | biostudies-literature

Efficient Estimation of Nonparametric Genetic Risk Function with Censored Data.

Project description:With an increasing number of causal genes discovered for complex human disorders, it is crucial to assess the genetic risk of disease onset for individuals who are carriers of these causal mutations and compare the distribution of age-at-onset with that in non-carriers. In many genetic epidemiological studies aiming at estimating causal gene effect on disease, the age-at-onset of disease is subject to censoring. In addition, some individuals' mutation carrier or non-carrier status can be unknown due to the high cost of in-person ascertainment to collect DNA samples or death in older individuals. Instead, the probability of these individuals' mutation status can be obtained from various sources. When mutation status is missing, the available data take the form of censored mixture data. Recently, various methods have been proposed for risk estimation from such data, but none is efficient for estimating a nonparametric distribution. We propose a fully efficient sieve maximum likelihood estimation method, in which we estimate the logarithm of the hazard ratio between genetic mutation groups using B-splines, while applying nonparametric maximum likelihood estimation for the reference baseline hazard function. Our estimator can be calculated via an expectation-maximization algorithm which is much faster than existing methods. We show that our estimator is consistent and semiparametrically efficient and establish its asymptotic distribution. Simulation studies demonstrate superior performance of the proposed method, which is applied to the estimation of the distribution of the age-at-onset of Parkinson's disease for carriers of mutations in the leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 gene.

| S-EPMC4581539 | biostudies-literature

A spline-based nonparametric analysis for interval-censored bivariate survival data.

Project description:In this manuscript we propose a spline-based sieve nonparametric maximum likelihood estimation method for joint distribution function with bivariate interval-censored data. We study the asymptotic behavior of the proposed estimator by proving the consistency and deriving the rate of convergence. Based on the sieve estimate of the joint distribution, we also develop an efficient nonparametric test for making inference about the dependence between two interval-censored event times and establish its asymptotic normality. We conduct simulation studies to examine the finite sample performance of the proposed methodology. Finally we apply the method to assess the association between two subtypes of mild cognitive impairment (MCI): amnestic MCI and non-amnestic MCI, for Huntington disease (HD) using data from a 12-year observational cohort study on premanifest HD individuals, PREDICT-HD.

| S-EPMC9255676 | biostudies-literature

Marginal Bayesian Semiparametric Modeling of Mismeasured Multivariate Interval-Censored Data.

Project description:Motivated by data gathered in an oral health study, we propose a Bayesian nonparametric approach for population-averaged modeling of correlated time-to-event data, when the responses can only be determined to lie in an interval obtained from a sequence of examination times and the determination of the occurrence of the event is subject to misclassification. The joint model for the true, unobserved time-to-event data is defined semiparametrically; proportional hazards, proportional odds, and accelerated failure time (proportional quantiles) are all fit and compared. The baseline distribution is modeled as a flexible tailfree prior. The joint model is completed by considering a parametric copula function. A general misclassification model is discussed in detail, considering the possibility that different examiners were involved in the assessment of the occurrence of the events for a given subject across time. We provide empirical evidence that the model can be used to estimate the underlying time-to-event distribution and the misclassification parameters without any external information about the latter parameters. We also illustrate the effect on the statistical inferences of neglecting the presence of misclassification.

| S-EPMC6711609 | biostudies-literature

Mark-specific hazard ratio model with missing multivariate marks.

Project description:An objective of randomized placebo-controlled preventive HIV vaccine efficacy (VE) trials is to assess the relationship between vaccine effects to prevent HIV acquisition and continuous genetic distances of the exposing HIVs to multiple HIV strains represented in the vaccine. The set of genetic distances, only observed in failures, is collectively termed the 'mark.' The objective has motivated a recent study of a multivariate mark-specific hazard ratio model in the competing risks failure time analysis framework. Marks of interest, however, are commonly subject to substantial missingness, largely due to rapid post-acquisition viral evolution. In this article, we investigate the mark-specific hazard ratio model with missing multivariate marks and develop two inferential procedures based on (i) inverse probability weighting (IPW) of the complete cases, and (ii) augmentation of the IPW estimating functions by leveraging auxiliary data predictive of the mark. Asymptotic properties and finite-sample performance of the inferential procedures are presented. This research also provides general inferential methods for semiparametric density ratio/biased sampling models with missing data. We apply the developed procedures to data from the HVTN 502 'Step' HIV VE trial.

| S-EPMC4848257 | biostudies-literature

Nonparametric bounds in two-sample summary-data Mendelian randomization: Some cautionary tales for practice.

Project description:Recently, in genetic epidemiology, Mendelian randomization (MR) has become a popular approach to estimate causal exposure effects by using single nucleotide polymorphisms from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) as instruments. The most popular type of MR study, a two-sample summary-data MR study, relies on having summary statistics from two independent GWAS and using parametric methods for estimation. However, little is understood about using a nonparametric bound-based analysis, a popular approach in traditional instrumental variables frameworks, to study causal effects in two-sample MR. In this article, we explore using a nonparametric, bound-based analysis in two-sample MR studies, focusing primarily on implications for practice. We also propose a framework to assess how likely one can obtain more informative bounds if we used a different MR design, notably a one-sample MR design. We conclude by demonstrating our findings through two real data analyses concerning the causal effect of smoking on lung cancer and the causal effect of high cholesterol on heart attacks. Overall, our results suggest that while a bound-based analysis may be appealing due to its nonparametric nature, it is far more conservative in two-sample settings than in one-sample settings to get informative bounds on the causal exposure effect.

| S-EPMC9314714 | biostudies-literature

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

Tweets

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data