Dataset Information

First-line alectinib for ALK-positive lung cancer: is there room for further improvement?

ABSTRACT: In the present editorial we describe the therapeutic achievements in the treatment of patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We focus on the major breakthroughs we have been witnessing in this context, from the introduction of crizotinib as the first approved targeted drug, to the meaningful improvement in terms of clinical benefit that alectinib, a second generation ALK-inhibitor, has recently provided over crizotinib. Finally, we address major trends of clinical research in this setting, and whether this might translate into further clinical improvement in the near future.

SUBMITTER: Addeo A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6044318 | biostudies-literature | 2018

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

First-line alectinib for ALK-positive lung cancer: is there room for further improvement?

Addeo Alfredo A Metro Giulio G

Drugs in context 20180710

In the present editorial we describe the therapeutic achievements in the treatment of patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We focus on the major breakthroughs we have been witnessing in this context, from the introduction of crizotinib as the first approved targeted drug, to the meaningful improvement in terms of clinical benefit that alectinib, a second generation ALK-inhibitor, has recently provided over crizotinib. Finally, we ad ...[more]

PMID: 30023004

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundTyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been a major advance in the treatment of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) which have been substantiated in clinical trials. However, real-world data on first-line alectinib in a Chinese patient population are limited.MethodsWe enrolled patients diagnosed with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC treated with first-line alectinib at 8 centers in China, including cases with symptomatic or active CNS metastases. Continuation of alectinib was permitted after local or gradual progression at the treating clinician's discretion. Time-to-treatment failure (TTF) was defined as the period from the start of alectinib to discontinuation for any cause including disease progression, death, adverse events and patient's preference. We defined longer EML4-ALK variants as containing EML4 fusions to at least exon 13 and shorter variants had EML4 fusions up to exon 6.ResultsOf the 110 patients included, 26.4% had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG) ≥2 points. The objective response rate (ORR) was 88.5% [95% confidence interval (CI): 79.9-94.3%] and median tumor shrinkage rate was 60% (range, 0-100%) in patients with target lesions. For patients with measurable central nervous system (CNS) metastases, the CNS-ORR was 92.9% (95% CI: 66.1-99.8%), additionally, 80% (8/10) of patients experienced significant improvement in CNS-related symptoms following alectinib treatment. With a median follow-up of 18.3 months, the estimated 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate and 2-year treatment failure-free rate were 81.1% (95% CI: 71.5-87.7%) and 81.0% (95% CI: 70.6-88.0%) respectively. Grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 6.4% and only 2 patients (1.8%) permanently discontinued alectinib due to adverse events. Multivariate analysis indicated that patients with metastases in ≥3 distant organs and a tumor reduction rate ≤50% demonstrated more unfavorable mPFS than their counterparts. Furthermore, patients carrying longer variants showed superior mPFS to those with shorter variants (not reached vs. 24.2 months, hazard ratio =0.17, 95% CI: 0.04-0.68, P=0.004).ConclusionsAlectinib showed substantial efficacy and an excellent safety profile in a real-world setting of Chinese patients. Clinical outcomes and long-term survival still require longer follow-up. Tumors with shorter EML4 fusion variants, more extensive metastases and less reduction in tumor lesions may require more aggressive strategies.

Project description:BackgroundAnaplastic lymphoma kinase-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (ALK-TKIs) are mainly used in the treatment of ALK-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but a comprehensive clinical evaluation of ALK-TKIs is lacking. Hence, a comparison of ALK-TKIs for first-line treatment of ALK-positive advanced NSCLC is essential to provide rational drug use and a basis for improving national policies and systems.MethodsAccording to the Guideline for the Administration of Clinical Comprehensive Evaluation of Drugs (2021) and the Technical Guideline for the Clinical Comprehensive Evaluation of Antitumor Drugs (2022), a comprehensive clinical evaluation index system of first-line treatment drugs for ALK-positive advanced NSCLC was established by literature review and expert interviews. We conducted a systematic literature review, meta-analysis, and other relevant data analyses, combined with an indicator system, to establish a quantitative and qualitative integration analysis for each indicator and each dimension of crizotinib, ceritinib, alectinib, ensartinib, brigatinib, and lorlatinib.ResultsThe comprehensive clinical evaluation results of all dimensions were as follows: in terms of safety, alectinib had a lower incidence of grade 3 and above adverse reactions; for effectiveness, alectinib, brigatinib, ensartinib, and lorlatinib showed better clinical efficacy, and alectinib and brigatinib have been recommended by several clinical guidelines; in terms of economy, second-generation ALK-TKIs have more cost-utility advantages, and both alectinib and ceritinib have been recommended by the UK and Canadian Health Technology Assessment (HTA) agencies; for suitability, accessibility, and innovation, alectinib has a higher degree of physician recommendations and patient compliance. Except for brigatinib and lorlatinib, all other ALK-TKIs have been admitted to the medical insurance directory; the accessibility of crizotinib, ceritinib, and alectinib is good, meeting the needs of patients. Second- and third-generation ALK-TKIs have higher blood-brain barrier permeability, stronger inhibition ability, and innovation than first-generation ALK-TKIs.ConclusionsCompared with other ALK-TKIs, alectinib performs better across six dimensions and has a higher comprehensive clinical value. The results provide better drug choice and rational use for patients with ALK-positive advanced NSCLC.

Project description:BackgroundAlectinib--a highly selective, CNS-active, ALK inhibitor-showed promising clinical activity in crizotinib-naive and crizotinib-resistant patients with ALK-rearranged (ALK-positive) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of alectinib in patients with ALK-positive NSCLC who progressed on previous crizotinib.MethodsWe did a phase 2 study at 27 centres in the USA and Canada. We enrolled patients aged 18 years or older with stage IIIB-IV, ALK-positive NSCLC who had progressed after crizotinib. Patients were treated with oral alectinib 600 mg twice daily until progression, death, or withdrawal. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving an objective response by an independent review committee using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1. Response endpoints were assessed in the response-evaluable population (ie, patients with measurable disease at baseline who received at least one dose of study drug), and efficacy and safety analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population (all enrolled patients). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01871805. The study is ongoing and patients are still receiving treatment.FindingsBetween Sept 4, 2013, and Aug 4, 2014, 87 patients were enrolled into the study (intention-to-treat population). At the time of the primary analysis (median follow-up 4·8 months [IQR 3·3-7·1]), 33 of 69 patients with measurable disease at baseline had a confirmed partial response; thus, the proportion of patients achieving an objective response by the independent review committee was 48% (95% CI 36-60). Adverse events were predominantly grade 1 or 2, most commonly constipation (31 [36%]), fatigue (29 [33%]), myalgia 21 [24%]), and peripheral oedema 20 [23%]). The most common grade 3 and 4 adverse events were changes in laboratory values, including increased blood creatine phosphokinase (seven [8%]), increased alanine aminotransferase (five [6%]), and increased aspartate aminotransferase (four [5%]). Two patients died: one had a haemorrhage (judged related to study treatment), and one had disease progression and a history of stroke (judged unrelated to treatment).InterpretationAlectinib showed clinical activity and was well tolerated in patients with ALK-positive NSCLC who had progressed on crizotinib. Therefore, alectinib could be a suitable treatment for patients with ALK-positive disease who have progressed on crizotinib.FundingF Hoffmann-La Roche.

Dataset Information

First-line alectinib for ALK-positive lung cancer: is there room for further improvement?

Publications

First-line alectinib for ALK-positive lung cancer: is there room for further improvement?

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets