Is alectinib the new first line therapy in ALK-rearranged advanced non-small cell lung cancer?
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: van der Wekken AJ
PROVIDER: S-EPMC6072953 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Jul
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Is alectinib the new first line therapy in ALK-rearranged advanced non-small cell lung cancer?
van der Wekken Anthonie J AJ Kok Klaas K Groen Harry J M HJM
Journal of thoracic disease 20180701 Suppl 18
Similar Datasets
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC4630528 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Alectinib has been approved as first-line treatment for anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small cell lung carcinoma. Oncologists are also exploring the possibility of applying alectinib in the perioperative period. Here, we present a patient with locally advanced lung adenocarcinoma associated with EML4-ALK fusion mutation, who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and alectinib treatment, and then underwent thoracoscopic left lower lung lobectomy. The patient initially received eight chemotherapy cycles and achieved partial remission. After eight cycles of chemotherapy, the lymph nodes in the hilar region again enlarged. The patient was then switched to 4 months of alectinib therapy, but no significant lesion changes were detected on imaging during this period. This raised the question of whether the patient developed alectinib resistance. The pathological findings of the postoperative lung lobe specimens indicated extensive necrosis in the tumor area with no residual tumor cells and massive chronic inflammatory cell infiltration around the tumor area, confirming inconsistency between the imaging findings and pathological results. Multi-point tumor specimen sampling was postoperatively performed. Tumor immune-related gene expression was detected in the sample with the help of the PanCancer IO360™ panel based on the nCounter platform. This is a rare case of a patient who was treated with neoadjuvant alectinib and had paradoxical radiographic findings and pathological responses. The possibility that intratumoral immune heterogeneity was responsible for this phenomenon has been discussed. Based on the findings, it is argued that the pathological response should be an important basis for assessing the effectiveness of neoadjuvant alectinib therapy.
| S-EPMC10470069 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The aim of the study is to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of alectinib for first-line treatment of ALK+ advanced non-small-cell lung cancer compared to crizotinib in the French setting. This study used a partitioned survival model, with three discrete health states (progression-free survival, post-progression survival and death). Survival probabilities were derived from a randomised Phase III clinical trial comparing alectinib to crizotinib (ALEX). Beyond the length of the trial (18 months), the efficacy of both treatments was considered equivalent. Occurrence of adverse events or brain metastases were considered as inter-current events. Utilities (and disutilities for intercurrent adverse events) derived from the EQ-5D were applied. Costs were attributed using standard French national public health tariffs. Projected mean overall survival was 4.62 years for alectinib and 4.18 years for crizotinib. Projected mean progression-free survival was 30.30 months for alectinib and 16.13 months for crizotinib. The total number of quality-adjusted life years projected was 3.40 for alectinib and 2.84 for crizotinib. The projected total cost of treatment over the lifetime of the model was € 246,022 for alectinib and € 195,486 for crizotinib. This extra cost was principally attributable to treatment acquisition costs and management before progression. Alectinib was associated with lower costs related to brain metastases and to management post-progression. The incremental cost per life year gained was 115,334 €/year and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was 90,232 €/QALY. First-line treatment of ALK+ NSCLC with alectinib provides superior clinical outcomes to crizotinib and is cost-effective in the French context.
| S-EPMC6964893 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The aim of the study is to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of alectinib for first-line treatment of ALK+ advanced non-small-cell lung cancer compared to crizotinib in the French setting. This study used a partitioned survival model, with three discrete health states (progression-free survival, post-progression survival and death). Survival probabilities were derived from a randomised Phase III clinical trial comparing alectinib to crizotinib (ALEX). Beyond the length of the trial (18 months), the efficacy of both treatments was considered equivalent. Occurrence of adverse events or brain metastases were considered as inter-current events. Utilities (and disutilities for intercurrent adverse events) derived from the EQ-5D were applied. Costs were attributed using standard French national public health tariffs. Projected mean overall survival was 4.62 years for alectinib and 4.18 years for crizotinib. Projected mean progression-free survival was 30.30 months for alectinib and 16.13 months for crizotinib. The total number of quality-adjusted life years projected was 3.40 for alectinib and 2.84 for crizotinib. The projected total cost of treatment over the lifetime of the model was € 246,022 for alectinib and € 195,486 for crizotinib. This extra cost was principally attributable to treatment acquisition costs and management before progression. Alectinib was associated with lower costs related to brain metastases and to management post-progression. The incremental cost per life year gained was 115,334 €/year and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was 90,232 €/QALY. First-line treatment of ALK+ NSCLC with alectinib provides superior clinical outcomes to crizotinib and is cost-effective in the French context.
| S-EPMC6964893 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The management of anaplastic lymphoma kinase rearranged (ALK+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) exemplifies the potential of a precision medicine approach to cancer care. The ALK inhibitor crizotinib has led to improved outcomes in the first- and second-line setting; however, toxicities, intracranial activity, and acquired resistance necessitated the advent of later generation ALK inhibitors. A large portion of acquired resistance to ALK inhibitors is caused by secondary mutations in the ALK kinase domain. Alectinib is a second-generation ALK inhibitor capable of overcoming multiple crizotinib-resistant ALK mutations and has demonstrated improved outcomes after crizotinib failure. Favorable toxicity profile and improved intracranial activity have spurred ongoing front-line trials and comparisons to other ALK inhibitors. However, important questions regarding comparability to competitor compounds, acquired alectinib resistance, and ALK inhibitor sequencing remain. Here, we review the key clinical data supporting alectinib in the second-line therapy of ALK+ NSCLC and provide context in comparison to other ALK inhibitors in development.
| S-EPMC5127851 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitors, such as alectinib (ALC), have dramatic therapeutic effects on ALK-rearranged lung cancer, but cures are usually not achieved. We focused on tumor cells that survive ALK inhibitor administration and hypothesized that targeted therapy for these cells could provide complete remission. To explore survival factors, we established patient-derived cell lines and screened them using proteome analysis. Three ALK-rearranged ALC-sensitive cell lines (KTOR-1, KTOR-2, KTOR-3) were established from 3 patients; the 50% inhibitory concentrations (IC50)s for ALC were 24-65 nM. Comprehensive protein expression profiles of the 3 cells indicated that exposure to ALC significantly enriched proteins related to actin and extracellular matrix (ECM) adhesion. We focused on Yes-associated protein 1 (YAP1), which is activated by ECM adhesion and actin fiber accumulation. Nuclear localization of YAP1 (an activation marker of YAP1) was assessed using immunohistostaining. In KTOR1-3 and H2228 cells from an ALK-rearranged line purchased from ATCC, exposure to ALC in vitro promoted YAP1 accumulation in the nucleus. BALB/nu mice xenograft models of H2228 or KTOR1 were administered ALC (8 mg/kg/day, N=4) or a vehicle (N=4) for 7 days, and tumors were evaluated. In ALC-administered tumors, YAP1 was localized to the nucleus, which was rarely the case in vehicle-administered tumors. The expression of pro-apoptosis factors Mcl-1 and Bcl-xL also increased after exposure to ALC in vitro, but the increment was cancelled by YAP1 inhibition by siRNA or verteporfin (VER), a non-specific YAP1 inhibitor. Exposure to ALC with combinatorial YAP1 inhibition significantly increased Caspase 3/7 activity. To address the treatment effects of YAP1 inhibition, a YAP1-activated H2228 cell line (H2ARY) was established by exposing H2228 cells to 100-300 nM of ALC for 3 months and thorough subsequent cloning. The H2ARY had lower sensitivity to ALC in vitro than parental H2228 (IC50: 1.4 μM vs 315 nM, 96 h) and restored the sensitivity by YAP1 inhibition (208 nM with VER 1 μM, 312 nM with siYAP1). Twenty-four xenograft models (mean volume: 199 mm3) of H2ARY on BALB/nu mice were randomized (Day 0) into 4 treatment groups to receive ALC monotherapy (8 mg/kg daily, N=6), VER monotherapy (12.5 mg/kg twice a week, N=7), combination (N=7), or vehicle (N=5). On day 15, the tumor volume of the vehicle and VER monotherapy groups reached > 800 mm3, with no significant differences among the groups. On day 33, the tumors of the combination group were significantly smaller than those of the ALC monotherapy group (187 vs 761 mm3, P = 0.0125). Exposure to ALC-activated YAP1 may regulate anti-apoptotic activity by controlling the expression of Mcl-1 and Bcl-xL in ALK-rearranged lung cancer cells. This is the first evidence that combinatorial therapy against ALK and YAP1 could enhance ALK-rearranged tumor treatment.
2019-07-28 | PXD014783 | JPOST Repository
Project description:Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is one of the leading causes of cancer deaths, both within the US and worldwide. There have been major treatment advances in NSCLC over the past decade with the discovery of molecular drivers of NSCLC, which has ushered in an era of personalized medicine. There are several actionable genetic aberrations in NSCLC, such as epidermal growth factor receptor and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK). In 3%-7% of NSCLC, a chromosomal inversion event in chromosome 2 leads to fusion of a portion of the ALK gene with the echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4 (EML4) gene. The constitutive activation of the ALK fusion oncogene renders it vulnerable to therapeutic intervention. This review focuses on the first-line treatment of advanced ALK-positive NSCLC using ALK inhibitors. Crizotinib was the first agent proven to be efficacious as first-line treatment for ALK-positive NSCLC. However, acquired resistance inevitably develops. The central nervous system is a sanctuary site that represents a common site for disease progression as well. Hence, more potent, selective next-generation ALK inhibitors that are able to cross the blood-brain barrier have been developed for treatment against crizotinib-resistant ALK-positive NSCLC and are also currently being evaluated for first-line therapy as well. In this review, we provide summary of the clinical experience with these drugs in the treatment of ALK-positive NSCLC.
| S-EPMC5217519 | biostudies-literature
Project description:In the present editorial we describe the therapeutic achievements in the treatment of patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We focus on the major breakthroughs we have been witnessing in this context, from the introduction of crizotinib as the first approved targeted drug, to the meaningful improvement in terms of clinical benefit that alectinib, a second generation ALK-inhibitor, has recently provided over crizotinib. Finally, we address major trends of clinical research in this setting, and whether this might translate into further clinical improvement in the near future.
| S-EPMC6044318 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundTyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been a major advance in the treatment of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) which have been substantiated in clinical trials. However, real-world data on first-line alectinib in a Chinese patient population are limited.MethodsWe enrolled patients diagnosed with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC treated with first-line alectinib at 8 centers in China, including cases with symptomatic or active CNS metastases. Continuation of alectinib was permitted after local or gradual progression at the treating clinician's discretion. Time-to-treatment failure (TTF) was defined as the period from the start of alectinib to discontinuation for any cause including disease progression, death, adverse events and patient's preference. We defined longer EML4-ALK variants as containing EML4 fusions to at least exon 13 and shorter variants had EML4 fusions up to exon 6.ResultsOf the 110 patients included, 26.4% had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG) ≥2 points. The objective response rate (ORR) was 88.5% [95% confidence interval (CI): 79.9-94.3%] and median tumor shrinkage rate was 60% (range, 0-100%) in patients with target lesions. For patients with measurable central nervous system (CNS) metastases, the CNS-ORR was 92.9% (95% CI: 66.1-99.8%), additionally, 80% (8/10) of patients experienced significant improvement in CNS-related symptoms following alectinib treatment. With a median follow-up of 18.3 months, the estimated 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate and 2-year treatment failure-free rate were 81.1% (95% CI: 71.5-87.7%) and 81.0% (95% CI: 70.6-88.0%) respectively. Grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 6.4% and only 2 patients (1.8%) permanently discontinued alectinib due to adverse events. Multivariate analysis indicated that patients with metastases in ≥3 distant organs and a tumor reduction rate ≤50% demonstrated more unfavorable mPFS than their counterparts. Furthermore, patients carrying longer variants showed superior mPFS to those with shorter variants (not reached vs. 24.2 months, hazard ratio =0.17, 95% CI: 0.04-0.68, P=0.004).ConclusionsAlectinib showed substantial efficacy and an excellent safety profile in a real-world setting of Chinese patients. Clinical outcomes and long-term survival still require longer follow-up. Tumors with shorter EML4 fusion variants, more extensive metastases and less reduction in tumor lesions may require more aggressive strategies.
| S-EPMC9830268 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC8740884 | biostudies-literature