Dataset Information

Linkage of Medicare Records to the Interagency Registry of Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:The Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) is a United States registry for adults receiving durable United States Food and Drug Administration-approved mechanical circulatory support devices (MCSDs). We merged INTERMACS records with Medicare claims to investigate the uncertainty of penetrance of Medicare beneficiaries within INTERMACS. METHODS:INTERMACS records and Medicare claims (January 1, 2008, through December 31, 2013) from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) were linked using a deterministic matching methodology. RESULTS:There was annual growth of CMS and INTERMACS centers performing durable MCSD implants among adults from 2008 through 2013 (54% and 87% increase, respectively). The number of CMS centers outnumbered INTERMACS centers throughout all years, with the 68% to 88% of CMS centers being represented in INTERMACS. Although annual patient volume was greatest for INTERMACS, the absolute number of patients significantly increased annually across both data sets from 2008 through 2013 (149% increase in CMS; 268% increase in INTERMACS). As a proportion of all INTERMACS registrants, Medicare beneficiary representation grew from 30% in 2008 to a high of 48% in 2010 and remained stable thereafter. Representation within INTERMACS of MCSDs implanted in Medicare beneficiaries more than doubled, from 36% in 2008 to 77% in 2013. CONCLUSIONS:Using a merged data set of MCSDs implanted between 2008 and 2013, we report that the vast majority of CMS centers and Medicare beneficiaries receiving MCSDs are increasingly captured in INTERMACS. Accordingly, contemporary studies in INTERMACS are relevant and generalizable to the Medicare population.

SUBMITTER: Liang Q

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6092931 | biostudies-literature | 2018 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Linkage of Medicare Records to the Interagency Registry of Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support.

Liang Qixing Q Ward Sarah S Pagani Francis D FD Sinha Shashank S SS Zhang Min M Kormos Robert R Aaronson Keith D KD Althouse Andrew D AD Kirklin James K JK Naftel David D Likosky Donald S DS

The Annals of thoracic surgery 20171219 5

<h4>Background</h4>The Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) is a United States registry for adults receiving durable United States Food and Drug Administration-approved mechanical circulatory support devices (MCSDs). We merged INTERMACS records with Medicare claims to investigate the uncertainty of penetrance of Medicare beneficiaries within INTERMACS.<h4>Methods</h4>INTERMACS records and Medicare claims (January 1, 2008, through December 31, 2013) from ...[more]

PMID: 29273199

Similar Datasets

Project description:Time course and predictors of myocardial recovery on contemporary left ventricular assist device support are poorly defined because of limited number of recovery patients at any implanting center. This study sought to investigate myocardial recovery using multicenter data from the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS). Thirteen thousand four hundred fifty-four adult patients were studied. Device explant rates for myocardial recovery were 0.9% at 1-year, 1.9% at 2-year, and 3.1% at 3-year follow-up. Independent predictors of device explantation for recovery were age <50 years (odds ratio [OR] 2.5), nonischemic etiology (OR 5.4), time since initial diagnosis <2 years (OR 3.4), suboptimal heart failure therapy before implant (OR 2.2), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter <6.5 cm (OR 1.7), pulmonary systolic artery pressure <50 mm Hg (OR 2.0), blood urea nitrogen <30 mg/dL (OR 3.3), and axial-flow device (OR 7.6). Patients with myocarditis (7.7%), postpartum cardiomyopathy (4.4%), and adriamycin-induced cardiomyopathy (4.1%) had highest rates of device explantation for recovery. Use of neurohormonal blockers on left ventricular assist device support was significantly higher in patients who were explanted for recovery. Importantly, 9% of all left ventricular assist device patients who were not explanted for recovery have demonstrated substantial improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (partial recovery) and had remarkable overlap in clinical characteristic profile compared with patients who were explanted for recovery (complete recovery). Complete and partial recovery rates have declined in parallel with recent changes observed in device indications and technology. Myocardial recovery is a spectrum of improvement rather than a binary clinical end point. One in every 10 left ventricular assist device patients demonstrates partial or complete myocardial recovery and should be targeted for functional assessment and optimization.

Project description:BackgroundAn optimal blood pressure (BP) range to mitigate morbidity and mortality on left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support has not been clearly defined.MethodsAverage Doppler opening pressure, mean arterial pressure (MAP), and/or systolic blood pressure (SBP) were calculated in operative survivors (n = 16,155) of LVAD support in the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS). BP distributions were used to group patients into low (BP <25th percentile), normal (25-75th percentile), high (75th-95th percentile), and very high (>95th percentile). Associations between BP and adverse events were evaluated using Cox regression (hazard ratio[HR], 95% confidence interval).ResultsThe median (25th, 75th) MAP, Doppler, and SBP (mm Hg) during continuous flow LVAD support were 84 (77, 90), 85 (80, 92), and 99 (90, 107) mm Hg, respectively. BP had a bimodal risk association with survival. At 3 years, survival was 58% ± 1.8% in those with low MAP (≤75 mm Hg) vs 70% ± 0.9%, 71% ± 1.5%, and 63% ± 3.0% in the those with normal, high, or very high average MAP, respectively. Patients with chronically low MAP (≤75 mm Hg), Doppler (≤80 mm Hg), and SBP (<90 mm Hg) had 35%-42% higher adjusted hazards of death than patients with normal or high BP (p ≤ 0.0001). Patients with MAP >100 mm Hg, Doppler ≥105 mm Hg, and SBP ≥120 mm Hg had 17%-20% higher adjusted hazards of death than those with normal pressures (p < 0.05). In patients on axial flow LVADs, elevated SBP (HR 1.08 [95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.13] per 10 mm Hg increase) but not MAP correlated with increased incident of stroke.ConclusionsIn INTERMACS, BP extremes during LVAD support increase the risk for adverse events, supporting a MAP goal >75 mm Hg and <90 mm Hg. Hypotension conferred the highest risk for mortality. Excessive BP control should be avoided, and Doppler opening pressure should not be assumed to represent MAP in all patients.

Project description:BackgroundThe outlook for ambulatory patients with advanced heart failure (HF) and the appropriate timing for left ventricular assist device (LVAD) or transplant remain uncertain. The aim of this study was to better understand disease trajectory and rates of progression to subsequent LVAD therapy and transplant in ambulatory advanced HF.MethodsPatients with advanced HF who were New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III or IV and Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) Profiles 4 to 7, despite optimal medical therapy (without inotropic therapy), were enrolled across 11 centers and followed for the end-points of survival, transplantation, LVAD placement, and health-related quality of life. A secondary intention-to-treat survival analysis compared outcomes for MedaMACS patients with a matched group of Profile 4 to 7 patients with LVADs from the INTERMACS registry.ResultsBetween May 2013 and October 2015, 161 patients were enrolled with INTERMACS Profiles 4 (12%), 5 (32%), 6 (49%), and 7 (7%). By 2 years after enrollment, 75 (47%) patients had reached a primary end-point with 39 (24%) deaths, 17 (11%) undergoing LVAD implantation, and 19 (12%) receiving a transplant. Compared with 1,753 patients with Profiles 4 to 7 receiving LVAD therapy, there was no overall difference in intention-to-treat survival between medical and LVAD therapy, but survival with LVAD therapy was superior to medical therapy among Profile 4 and 5 patients (p = 0.0092). Baseline health-related quality of life was lower among patients receiving a LVAD than those enrolled on continuing oral medical therapy, but increased after 1 year for survivors in both cohorts.ConclusionsAmbulatory patients with advanced HF are at high risk for poor outcomes, with only 53% alive on medical therapy after 2 years of follow-up. Survival was similar for medical and LVAD therapy in the overall cohort, which included the lower severity Profiles 6 and 7, but survival was better with LVAD therapy among patients in Profiles 4 and 5. Given the poor outcomes in this group of advanced HF patients, timely consideration of transplant and LVAD is of critical importance.

Project description:BackgroundThe reported ventricular assist device (VAD) experience in the pediatric congenital heart disease (CHD) population is limited. We sought to describe contemporary use and outcomes of VADs in children with CHD and compare these outcomes to those of non-CHD children.MethodsPatients enrolled in the Pediatric Interagency Registry for Mechanical Circulatory Support (Pedimacs) between September 19, 2012 through June 30, 2017 were included. CHD was classified as biventricular vs single ventricle (Stages 1, 2, or 3). Outcomes were compared between groups and multivariable analysis was used to identify factors associated with mortality on the device.ResultsAmong the 471 patients enrolled, 108 (24%) had CHD (45 biventricular and 63 single ventricle). CHD patients were younger (5.7 ± 5.7 years vs 9.8 ± 6.5 years; p < 0.0001) and smaller (0.8 ± 0.5 m2 vs 1.2 ± 0.7 m2; p < 0.0001) compared with non-CHD patients. CHD patients were more likely to receive a paracorporeal continuous-flow VAD (36.1% vs 12.9%; p < 0.0001) and less likely to receive an implantable continuous-flow VAD (27.8% vs 55.0%; p < 0.0001) compared with non-CHD patients. After 6 months on a VAD, CHD patients had higher mortality (36.4% vs 12.1%) and a lower transplantation rate (29.1% vs 59.9%) than non-CHD patients (p < 0.0001). In the multivariable analysis, CHD was the factor most strongly associated with mortality on VAD (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.9; p < 0.0001), whereas the factors implantable continuous-flow device and high-volume center were protective (HR = 0.3, p < 0.0001, and HR = 0.6, respectively; p = 0.02).ConclusionsVAD use in children with CHD is associated with increased mortality and decreased transplant rates compared to children without CHD. For the subgroup of children with CHD who received implantable continuous-flow VADs, survival rates were higher and comparable to those of children without CHD. Increased experience correlated with better survival in pediatric VADs.

Project description:BackgroundThe linkage of registries to Medicare claims data can help extend follow-up for patients receiving medical devices. In the present study, we tested and validated an algorithm that does not require patient identifiers to link data from a national vascular registry and Medicare claims data.MethodsWe used data from the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI), a registry capturing data from >600 centers for several different vascular procedures, and Medicare claims from 2003 to 2018. We restricted the study to patients aged ≥65 years who had fee-for-service entitlement at their procedure. We performed an indirect linkage to combine the VQI and Medicare data at the patient level using a sequential algorithm based on the patient's date of birth, sex, zip code, procedure date, and procedure facility. We compared the indirectly linked cohort against a reference standard of a cohort directly linked using Social Security numbers. We calculated the matching rate and accuracy overall and before and after October 2015 when the International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision (ICD-10) system was adopted in the United States.ResultsA total of 144,045 VQI-Medicare-linked patients were in the reference standard cohort. Using the indirect linking algorithm, we matched 133,966 of the 144,045 VQI patients to their Medicare claims with a matching rate of 93.0%. Of the 133,966 patients, 133,104 were correctly matched (matching accuracy, 99.4%). The matching rate was higher when the indirect linkage was implemented using the ICD-10 coded data than using the ICD-9 coded data (94.0% vs 92.2%). The accuracy of the indirect linkage remained high for all procedure modules after the ICD-10 coding change (overall, 99.4%; range, 99.0%-99.7%).ConclusionsIn the present study, we successfully used indirect identifiers to link the VQI data to Medicare claims with >90% success and >99% accuracy. When direct linkage of the registry claims data using Social Security numbers is not possible because of availability or confidentiality, or both, our algorithm for indirect linkage provides a suitable alternative. The matching rate and accuracy will help ensure the accuracy of long-term follow-up and the completeness and representativeness of linked databases for relevant research and quality improvement initiatives.

Dataset Information

Linkage of Medicare Records to the Interagency Registry of Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support.

Publications

Linkage of Medicare Records to the Interagency Registry of Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets