Dataset Information

A new percutaneous method for inframammary fold reconstruction in implant-based breast reconstruction: Vertical pendulum suture.

ABSTRACT: Several operative techniques for inframammary fold (IMF) reconstruction have been described and have resolved the shortcomings of conventional methods. However, there are still difficulties with IMF reconstruction, that is, performance through small mastectomy scars, creation of a smooth IMF curve, transfer of external IMF markings to the interior chest wall, or determining correct IMF without an implant in place. We have used a type of anchor suture with a completely percutaneous approach, the vertical pendulum suture (VP suture), to reconstruct the IMF easily in implant-based breast reconstruction.The VP suture requires a pair of skin incisions a few millimeters in length (incisions A and B). The needle passes through the subcutaneous tissue from incision A, the chest wall, again through the subcutaneous tissue, and exits from incision B. Then, the needle passes through the edge of the dermis from incision B, the superficial layer of the subcutaneous tissue, again through the other edge of the dermis, and exits from incision A. The knot is tied and buried in the subcutaneous tissue. The whole technique can be performed percutaneously without visualizing the inside of the pocket. A retrospective case series study of photographs and chart review was conducted for all cases of unilateral implant-based breast reconstruction performed from December 2016 to December 2017 at Ina Central Hospital, Ina, Japan.Nine consecutive patients underwent unilateral implant-based breast reconstruction. Five patients treated using the VP suture were included in this study. All 5 patients showed good esthetic results over the follow-up period (average, 11 months). Scalloped appearance was observed in all patients, but flattened spontaneously and disappeared within 3 months postoperatively. There were no complications, such as hematoma, infection, skin necrosis, pneumothorax, seroma, scar contracture, or implant injury.The VP suture is completely percutaneous, parallel to the IMF, and is easy to perform at any time during surgery regardless of whether the implant is in place or not. IMF reconstruction is facilitated by freeing the surgeon from the need to visualize the inside of the pocket.

SUBMITTER: Nakajima Y

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6112950 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundAlthough video-assisted breast surgery is gaining popularity, endoscopic reconstruction after mastectomy is still facing lots of problems, bring about that endoscopic method has not yet become a standard procedure for breast cancer reconstruction. Here, we introduce a novel surgical technique of video-assisted transaxillary nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate implant-based breast reconstruction and describe the detailed surgical procedure using this technique.MethodsDetailed steps of surgical procedure, the patient characteristics and the mean operative time of this new technique were described in this article. All patients were asked to score their satisfaction with their reconstructed breasts preoperatively, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months postoperatively using the BREAST-Q.ResultsAt first, we used our "conventional method" and performed on 10 patients from April 2017 to June 2020; the operative time was 324.80 ± 66.39 minutes. After improving several procedures of the technique, the "optimized method" was performed on 14 cases from July 2020 to November 2020; the operative time decreased to 193.71 ± 28.75 minutes with shortest was 133 minutes; the optimized method was novel and easy to learn and be generalized. Most of the patients were satisfied with the reconstruction results. There was no significant difference between preoperative scores and scores at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months (p = 0.364). Since there is no wound on the breast dome, no obvious postoperative complications were observed except for one patient presented with infection.ConclusionsThis new technique has allowed surgeons to achieve excellent and reproducible outcomes in a single-stage procedure and represents an excellent technique for patients who wish to have a scarless and aesthetically pleasing appearance after mastectomy for breast cancer. This article also highlights the mean operative time (193.71 ± 28.75 minutes) that has been made possible with this new technique.Level of evidence vThis journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors http://www.springer.com/00266 .

Project description:The aim of the study was to analyze the reasons for removing implants after breast reconstruction in the course of treatment of breast cancer. The study involved 428 patients, who underwent a total of 648 breast reconstruction procedures using artificial implants. 47 out of 648 cases (7.3%) were identified in which the implant had to be removed. Of the 47 cases, 57.4% had undergone deferred reconstruction, and 42.6% immediate reconstruction; 27.7% had undergone pre-operative chemotherapy and radiotherapy, 27.7% pre-operative chemotherapy, and 2.1% pre-operative radiotherapy; 6.4% were diabetic, 4.3% active smokers, and more than 50.0% had BMI greater than 25 kg/m2. In 83.0% of the analyzed cases, the reason for removal of the implant was infection, in 8.5% it was local recurrence of breast cancer, in 4.3% it was damage (leakage) of the implant, and in 2.1% it was post-operative pain. About 87.0% of infections appeared within one year of implantation; however, less than a half developed within 90 days of the reconstructive surgery, and up to 30 days only about 13.0% had appeared. Among the etiological agents of infections were: coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (31.3%), Staphylococcus aureus (18.7%), Enterococcus faecalis (9.4%), Enterobacter cloacae (18.8%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (12.5%), Acinetobacter lwoffii (3.1%), and other Gram-negative fermenting rods accounted for 6.2%. Infections were the most common reason for removing the implant after breast reconstruction. and occurred most often as late infections (>30 days after surgery). The time of observation for infectious complications should be at least 1 year.The aim of the study was to analyze the reasons for removing implants after breast reconstruction in the course of treatment of breast cancer. The study involved 428 patients, who underwent a total of 648 breast reconstruction procedures using artificial implants. 47 out of 648 cases (7.3%) were identified in which the implant had to be removed. Of the 47 cases, 57.4% had undergone deferred reconstruction, and 42.6% immediate reconstruction; 27.7% had undergone pre-operative chemotherapy and radiotherapy, 27.7% pre-operative chemotherapy, and 2.1% pre-operative radiotherapy; 6.4% were diabetic, 4.3% active smokers, and more than 50.0% had BMI greater than 25 kg/m2. In 83.0% of the analyzed cases, the reason for removal of the implant was infection, in 8.5% it was local recurrence of breast cancer, in 4.3% it was damage (leakage) of the implant, and in 2.1% it was post-operative pain. About 87.0% of infections appeared within one year of implantation; however, less than a half developed within 90 days of the reconstructive surgery, and up to 30 days only about 13.0% had appeared. Among the etiological agents of infections were: coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (31.3%), Staphylococcus aureus (18.7%), Enterococcus faecalis (9.4%), Enterobacter cloacae (18.8%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (12.5%), Acinetobacter lwoffii (3.1%), and other Gram-negative fermenting rods accounted for 6.2%. Infections were the most common reason for removing the implant after breast reconstruction. and occurred most often as late infections (>30 days after surgery). The time of observation for infectious complications should be at least 1 year.

Dataset Information

A new percutaneous method for inframammary fold reconstruction in implant-based breast reconstruction: Vertical pendulum suture.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure