Dataset Information

Video-assisted Transaxillary Nipple-sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Implant-based Breast Reconstruction: A Novel and Promising Method.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Although video-assisted breast surgery is gaining popularity, endoscopic reconstruction after mastectomy is still facing lots of problems, bring about that endoscopic method has not yet become a standard procedure for breast cancer reconstruction. Here, we introduce a novel surgical technique of video-assisted transaxillary nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate implant-based breast reconstruction and describe the detailed surgical procedure using this technique.

Methods

Detailed steps of surgical procedure, the patient characteristics and the mean operative time of this new technique were described in this article. All patients were asked to score their satisfaction with their reconstructed breasts preoperatively, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months postoperatively using the BREAST-Q.

Results

At first, we used our "conventional method" and performed on 10 patients from April 2017 to June 2020; the operative time was 324.80 ± 66.39 minutes. After improving several procedures of the technique, the "optimized method" was performed on 14 cases from July 2020 to November 2020; the operative time decreased to 193.71 ± 28.75 minutes with shortest was 133 minutes; the optimized method was novel and easy to learn and be generalized. Most of the patients were satisfied with the reconstruction results. There was no significant difference between preoperative scores and scores at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months (p = 0.364). Since there is no wound on the breast dome, no obvious postoperative complications were observed except for one patient presented with infection.

Conclusions

This new technique has allowed surgeons to achieve excellent and reproducible outcomes in a single-stage procedure and represents an excellent technique for patients who wish to have a scarless and aesthetically pleasing appearance after mastectomy for breast cancer. This article also highlights the mean operative time (193.71 ± 28.75 minutes) that has been made possible with this new technique.

Level of evidence v

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors http://www.springer.com/00266 .

SUBMITTER: Zhang S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8381859 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:IntroductionThe emphasis on aesthetic outcomes and quality of life (QoL) has motivated surgeons to develop skin-sparing or nipple-sparing mastectomy (SSM/ NSM) for breast cancer treatment or prevention. During the same operation, a so-called immediate breast reconstruction is performed. The breast can be reconstructed by positioning of a breast implant above (prepectoral) or below (subpectoral) the pectoralis major muscle or by using the patients' own tissue (autologous reconstruction). The optimal positioning of the implant prepectoral or subpectoral is currently not clear. Subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) is still standard care in many countries, but prepectoral IBBR is increasingly performed. This heterogeneity in breast reconstruction practice is calling for randomised clinical trials (RCTs) to guide treatment decisions.Methods and analysisInternational, pragmatic, multicentre, randomised, superiority trial. The primary objective of this trial is to test whether prepectoral IBBR provides better QoL with respect to long-term (24 months) physical well-being (chest) compared with subpectoral IBBR for patients undergoing SSM or NSM for prevention or treatment of breast cancer. Secondary objectives will compare prepectoral versus subpectoral IBBR in terms of safety, QoL and patient satisfaction, aesthetic outcomes and burden on patients. Total number of patients to be included: 372 (186 per arm).Ethics and disseminationThis study will be conducted in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical approval has been obtained for the lead investigator's site by the Ethics Committee 'Ethikkommission Nordwest- und Zentralschweiz' (2020-00256, 26 March 2020). The results of this study will be published in a peer-reviewed medical journal, independent of the results, following the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials standards for RCTs and good publication practice. Metadata describing the type, size and content of the datasets will be shared along with the study protocol and case report forms on public repositories adhering to the FAIR (Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability, and Reuse) principles.Trial registration numberNCT04293146.

Project description:Background A novel endoscopic-assisted technique (NET) was created by our team for nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) and latissimus dorsi muscle flap (LDMF) reconstruction that enables the procedure to be conducted through a single axillary incision. The authors hypothesized that the NET has the advantages of the traditional ET (TET) and a reduced operation time. The purpose of this study is to compare the advantages and disadvantages of NET, TET and open surgery. Methods A retrospective cohort study was performed on patients who underwent LDMF reconstruction after NSM using open surgery, the TET, or the NET between January 2013 and June 2021. The following outcomes were compared: the operation time, size of the LDMF, the complication rate, hospital length of stay, hospital costs, aesthetic results (the BREAST-Q questionnaire), and quality of life (QoL). The BREAST-Q questionnaire and QoL were underwent preoperatively and 1, 3, and 12 months postoperatively. Results A total of 17 ETs (comprising 10 NETs and 7 TETs) and 28 open surgery procedures were identified and analyzed, the baseline characteristics were comparable in terms of age, body mass index (BMI), tumor location, cup size, and disease stage of the three groups. The mean operation time of the NET group (395.8±176.0 min) in the exploration stage was shorter than that of the TET group (531.6±69.6 min) and equivalent to that of the open surgery group (400.9±67.3 min). The overall postoperative complication rates of the ET and open surgery groups were 35.3% and 60.7%, respectively (P=0.09). The aesthetic results in relation to patients’ satisfaction with their breasts (P=0.001) and backs (P=0.001) were better in the ET group than the open surgery group beginning at 1 month postoperatively. The ET group had better psychosocial well-being beginning at 1 month postoperatively (P=0.002) and sexual well-being beginning at 3 months postoperatively (P<0.001) than the open surgery group. Conclusions LDMF reconstruction after NSM using the ET is associated with lower complication rates, good aesthetic results, and a better QoL than open surgery procedures. The NET is a promising approach, a more convenient procedure, and has a shorter surgery time than TET, however, this conclusion needs to be further validated by randomized clinical trial (RCT) research with a larger sample size.