Dataset Information

Model-Based Vestibular Afferent Stimulation: Evaluating Selective Electrode Locations and Stimulation Waveform Shapes.

ABSTRACT: A dysfunctional vestibular system can be a severe detriment to the quality of life of a patient. Recent studies have shown the feasibility for a vestibular implant to restore rotational sensation via electrical stimulation of vestibular ampullary nerves. However, the optimal stimulation site for selective elicitation of the desired nerve is still unknown. We realized a finite element model on the basis of ?CT scans of a human inner ear and incorporated naturally distributed, artificial neural trajectories. A well-validated neuron model of myelinated fibers was incorporated to predict nerve responses to electrical stimulation. Several virtual electrodes were placed in locations of interest inside the bony labyrinth (intra-labyrinthine) and inside the temporal bone, near the target nerves (extra-labyrinthine), to determine preferred stimulation sites and electrode insertion depths. We investigated various monopolar and bipolar electrode configurations as well as different pulse waveform shapes for their ability to selectively stimulate the target nerve and for their energy consumption. The selectivity was evaluated with an objective measure of the fiber recruitment. Considerable differences of required energy and achievable selectivity between the configurations were observed. Bipolar, intra-labyrinthine electrodes provided the best selectivities but also consumed the highest amount of energy. Bipolar, extra-labyrinthine configurations did not offer any advantages compared to the monopolar approach. No selective stimulation could be performed with the monopolar, intra-labyrinthine approach. The monopolar, extra-labyrinthine electrodes required the least energy for satisfactory selectivities, making it the most promising approach for functional vestibular implants. Different pulse waveform shapes did not affect the achieved selectivity considerably but shorter pulse durations showed consistently a more selective activation of the target nerves. A cathodic, centered triangular waveform shape was identified as the most energy-efficient of the tested shapes. Based on these simulations we are able to recommend the monopolar, extra-labyrinthine stimulation approach with cathodic, centered triangular pulses as good trade-off between selectivity and energy consumption. Future implant designs could benefit from the findings presented here.

SUBMITTER: Schier P

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6125370 | biostudies-literature | 2018

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Model-Based Vestibular Afferent Stimulation: Evaluating Selective Electrode Locations and Stimulation Waveform Shapes.

Schier Peter P Handler Michael M Johnson Chacko Lejo L Schrott-Fischer Anneliese A Fritscher Karl K Saba Rami R Baumgartner Christian C Baumgarten Daniel D

Frontiers in neuroscience 20180830

A dysfunctional vestibular system can be a severe detriment to the quality of life of a patient. Recent studies have shown the feasibility for a vestibular implant to restore rotational sensation via electrical stimulation of vestibular ampullary nerves. However, the optimal stimulation site for selective elicitation of the desired nerve is still unknown. We realized a finite element model on the basis of μCT scans of a human inner ear and incorporated naturally distributed, artificial neural tr ...[more]

PMID: 30214391

Similar Datasets

Project description:It is still challenging to achieve a complex grasp or fine finger control by using surface functional electrical stimulation (FES), which usually requires a precise electrode configuration under laboratory or clinical settings. The goals of this study are as follows: 1) to study the possibility of selectively activating individual fingers; 2) to investigate whether the current activation threshold and selective range of individual fingers are affected by two factors: changes in the electrode position and forearm rotation (pronation, neutral and supination); and 3) to explore a theoretical model for guidance of the electrode placement used for selective activation of individual fingers. A coordinate system with more than 400 grid points was established over the forearm skin surface. A searching procedure was used to traverse all grid points to identify the stimulation points for finger extension/flexion by applying monophasic stimulation pulses. Some of the stimulation points for finger extension and flexion were selected and tested in their respective two different forearm postures according to the number and the type of the activated fingers and the strength of finger action response to the electrical stimulation at the stimulation point. The activation thresholds and current ranges of the selectively activated finger at each stimulation point were determined by visual analysis. The stimulation points were divided into three groups ("Low", "Medium" and "High") according to the thresholds of the 1st activated fingers. The angles produced by the selectively activated finger within selective current ranges were measured and analyzed. Selective stimulation of extension/flexion is possible for most fingers. Small changes in electrode position and forearm rotation have no significant effect on the threshold amplitude and the current range for the selective activation of most fingers (p > 0.05). The current range is the largest (more than 2 mA) for selective activation of the thumb, followed by those for the index, ring, middle and little fingers. The stimulation points in the "Low" group for all five fingers lead to noticeable finger angles at low current intensity, especially for the index, middle, and ring fingers. The slopes of the finger angle variation in the "Low" group for digits 2~4 are inversely proportional to the current intensity, whereas the slopes of the finger angle variation in other groups and in all groups for the thumb and little finger are proportional to the current intensity. It is possible to selectively activate the extension/flexion of most fingers by stimulating the forearm muscles. The physiological characteristics of each finger should be considered when placing the negative electrode for selective stimulation of individual fingers. The electrode placement used for the selective activation of individual fingers should not be confined to the location with the lowest activation threshold.

Dataset Information

Model-Based Vestibular Afferent Stimulation: Evaluating Selective Electrode Locations and Stimulation Waveform Shapes.

Publications

Model-Based Vestibular Afferent Stimulation: Evaluating Selective Electrode Locations and Stimulation Waveform Shapes.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets