Dataset Information

Cardiac Rehabilitation Models around the Globe.

ABSTRACT: Alternative models of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) delivery, such as home or community-based programs, have been developed to overcome underutilization. However, their availability and characteristics have never been assessed globally. In this cross-sectional study, a piloted survey was administered online to CR programs globally. CR was available in 111/203 (54.7%) countries globally; data were collected in 93 (83.8% country response rate). 1082 surveys (32.1% program response rate) were initiated. Globally, 85 (76.6%) countries with CR offered supervised programs, and 51 (45.9%; or 25.1% of all countries) offered some alternative model. Thirty-eight (34.2%) countries with CR offered home-based programs, with 106 (63.9%) programs offering some form of electronic CR (eCR). Twenty-five (22.5%) countries with CR offered community-based programs. Where available, programs served a mean of 21.4% ± 22.8% of their patients in home-based programs. The median dose for home-based CR was 3 sessions (Q25-Q75 = 1.0?4.0) and for community-based programs was 20 (Q25?Q75 = 9.6?36.0). Seventy-eight (47.0%) respondents did not perceive they had sufficient capacity to meet demand in their home-based program, for reasons including funding and insufficient staff. Where alternative CR models are offered, capacity is insufficient half the time. Home-based CR dose is insufficient to achieve health benefits. Allocation to program model should be evidence-based.

SUBMITTER: Lima de Melo Ghisi G

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6162832 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Cardiac Rehabilitation Models around the Globe.

Lima de Melo Ghisi Gabriela G Pesah Ella E Turk-Adawi Karam K Supervia Marta M Lopez Jimenez Francisco F Grace Sherry L SL

Journal of clinical medicine 20180907 9

Alternative models of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) delivery, such as home or community-based programs, have been developed to overcome underutilization. However, their availability and characteristics have never been assessed globally. In this cross-sectional study, a piloted survey was administered online to CR programs globally. CR was available in 111/203 (54.7%) countries globally; data were collected in 93 (83.8% country response rate). 1082 surveys (32.1% program response rate) were initiat ...[more]

PMID: 30205461

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundRadon is the primary source of environmental radiation exposure posing a significant human health risk in cold countries. In Canada, most provinces have revised building codes by 2017, requiring construction solutions to avoid radon in all new buildings. While various construction solutions and remediation techniques have been proposed and evaluated, the question about the best method that would effectively reduce radon in a variety of contexts remained unanswered. Radon practitioners, officials of radon control programs, and businesses offering radon testing and mitigation services, builders, property managers, homeowners and residents also have similar queries.ObjectiveThis paper systematically reviewed both experimental and observational studies (S) with radon interventions (I) used globally in residential houses (P) compared to other residential or model houses (C) to evaluate relative mitigation effectiveness (O) that could guide selecting the best radon reduction strategy for residential buildings.MethodsTwo researchers searched fifteen academic bibliographic and grey literature databases for radon intervention studies conducted around the world, with particular emphasis on areas of North America and Europe published from 1990 to 2018.Interventions in residential and model houses were included, but studies piloted purely in the lab were excluded; the PRISMA checklist was used to synthesize data; Cochrane and Hamilton tools were used to evaluate study quality.ResultsStudies around the globe have investigated a variety of construction solutions, radon mitigation and remediation systems with different levels of effectiveness. In most cases, sub-slab or sump depressurization system (SSDS) with active ventilation technique was found more effective in achieving a significant and sustained radon reduction than the passive methods such as sealing, membrane, block and beam, simple ventilation, or filtration. The choice of an optimal strategy largely depends on the factors related to the initial radon level, routes of entry, building design and age, as well as other geologic, atmospheric, and climatic conditions.ConclusionAlthough an active SSDS is the best mitigation systems, at places, it needs to be combined with another system and installed by a trained radon professional considering the pertinent factors to ensure radon level continues to remain below the action level. This study did not conduct any economic evaluation of the mitigation measures. Future review with studies on the implementation of new building codes will provide updated evidence.RecommendationFor the practical implementation of radon mitigation, training of the construction industry, information provision for residents, the establishment of public funds, incorporation of radon-prone areas in the land utilization maps, and enacting building codes deemed essential.

Project description:BackgroundHeart failure (HF), is a leading cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in Sub-Saharan Africa. Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is known to improve functional capacity and reduce morbidity associated with HF. Although CR is a low-cost intervention, global access and adherence rates to CR remain poor. In regions such as Western Kenya, CR programs do not exist. We sought to establish the feasibility CR for HF in this region by testing adherence to institution and home-based models of CR.MethodsOne hundred participants with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II and III HF symptoms were prospectively enrolled from a tertiary health facility in Western Kenya. Participants were non-randomly assigned to participate in one of two CR models based on their preference. Institution based cardiac rehabilitation (IBCR) comprised 36 facility-based exercise sessions over a period of 12 weeks. Home based cardiac rehabilitation (HBCR) comprised weekly pedometer guided exercise targets over a period of 12 weeks. An observational arm (OA) receiving usual care was also enrolled. The primary endpoint of CR feasibility was assessed based on study participants to adherence to at least 25% of exercise sessions. Secondary outcomes of change in NYHA symptom class, and six-minute walk time distance (6MWTD) were also evaluated. Data were summarized and analyzed as means (SD) and frequencies. Paired t-tests, Chi Square, Fisher's, and ANOVA tests were used for comparisons.FindingsMean protocol adherence was greater than 25% in both CR models; 46% ± 18 and 29% ± 11 (P < 0.05) among IBCR and HBCR participants respectively. Improvements by at least one NYHA class were observed among 71%, 41%, and 54%, of IBCR, HBCR and OA participants respectively. 6MWTD increased significantly by a mean of 31 ± 65 m, 40 ± 55 m and 38 ± 71 m in the IBCR, HBCR and OA respectively (P < 0.05).ConclusionsIBCR and HBCR, are feasible rehabilitation models for HF in Western Kenya. Whereas improvement in functional capacity was observed, effectiveness of CR in this population remains unknown. Future randomized studies evaluating effect size, long term efficacy, and safety of cardiac rehabilitation in low resource settings such as Kenya are recommended.

Project description:BackgroundWe investigated impacts of COVID-19 on cardiac rehabilitation (CR) delivery around the globe, including virtual delivery, as well as effects on providers and patients.MethodsIn this cross-sectional study, a piloted survey was administered to CR programs globally via REDCap from April to June 2020. The 50 members of the International Council of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation (ICCPR) and personal contacts facilitated program identification.ResultsOverall, 1062 (18.3% program response rate) responses were received from 70/111 (63.1% country response rate) countries in the world with existent CR programs. Of these, 367 (49.1%) programs reported they had stopped CR delivery, and 203 (27.1%) stopped temporarily (mean = 8.3 ± 2.8 weeks). Alternative models were delivered in 322 (39.7%) programs, primarily through low-tech modes (n = 226,19.3%). Furthermore, 353 (30.2%) respondents were re-deployed, and 276 (37.3%) felt the need to work due to fear of losing their job, despite the perceived risk of contracting COVID-19 (mean = 30.0% ± 27.4/100). Also, 266 (22.5%) reported anxiety, 241(20.4%) were concerned about exposing their family, 113 (9.7%) reported increased workload to transition to remote delivery, and 105 (9.0%) were juggling caregiving responsibilities during business hours. Patients were often contacting staff regarding grocery shopping for heart-healthy foods (n = 333, 28.4%), how to use technology to interact with the program (n = 329, 27.9%), having to stop their exercise because they have no place to exercise (n = 303, 25.7%), and their risk of death from COVID-19 due to pre-existing cardiovascular disease (n = 249, 21.2%). Respondents perceived staff (n = 488, 41.3%) and patient (n = 453, 38.6%) personal protective equipment, as well as COVID-19 screening (n = 414, 35.2%), and testing (n = 411, 35.0%) as paramount to in-person service resumption.ConclusionGiven the estimated number of CR programs globally, these results suggest approximately 4400 CR programs globally have ceased or temporarily stopped service delivery. Those that remain open are implementing new technologies to ensure their patients receive CR safely, despite the challenges.Highlights- COVID-19 has impacted cardiac rehabilitation (CR) delivery around the globe.- In this cross-sectional study, a survey was completed by 1062 (18.3%) CR programs from 70 (63.1%) countries.- The pandemic has resulted in at least temporary cessation of ~75% of CR programs, with others ceasing initiation of new patients, reducing components delivered, and/or changing of mode delivery with little opportunity for planning and training.- There is also significant psychosocial and economic impact on CR providers.- Alternative CR model (e.g., home-based, virtual) reimbursement advocacy is needed, to ensure safe, accessible secondary prevention delivery.

Dataset Information

Cardiac Rehabilitation Models around the Globe.

Publications

Cardiac Rehabilitation Models around the Globe.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets