Dataset Information

Immunotherapy in Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients: Ushering Chemotherapy Through the Checkpoint Inhibitors?

ABSTRACT: New ways of exploiting the immune system for cancer treatment have been tested for decades with moderate outcomes. Based on previous immunotherapy knowledge, agents targeting immune checkpoints seem to be remarkably effective in a wide range of tumors. Immune checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) provide longlasting responses in specific patients. Nevertheless, with overall response rates ? 20%, combinational protocols for various patient subgroups are needed. A good partner treatment to immunotherapy could be chemotherapy, as it successfully modulates the immune response either by controlling or enhancing the antitumor immune activity. Primary research provides promising results in metastatic NSCLC patients using this approach, but further large-scale trials are needed. The implementation of immunotherapy in nonmetastatic cases is also appealing. We review the potential clinical benefits of immunotherapy alone or in concert with chemotherapy in NSCLC.

SUBMITTER: Kanwal B

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6217867 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Immunotherapy in Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients: Ushering Chemotherapy Through the Checkpoint Inhibitors?

Kanwal Bushra B Biswas Sharmi S Seminara Robert S RS Jeet Charan C

Cureus 20180904 9

New ways of exploiting the immune system for cancer treatment have been tested for decades with moderate outcomes. Based on previous immunotherapy knowledge, agents targeting immune checkpoints seem to be remarkably effective in a wide range of tumors. Immune checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) provide longlasting responses in specific patients. Nevertheless, with overall response rates ≤ 20%, combinational protocols for various patient subgroups are needed. A ...[more]

PMID: 30416904

Similar Datasets

Project description:IntroductionRecent clinical trials have confirmed that anti-programmed cell death-1/ligand 1 (anti-PD-1/L1) combined with either anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (anti-CTLA-4) or anti-T-cell immunoreceptor with Ig and ITIM domains (TIGIT) antibodies (dual immunotherapy) produced significant benefits as first-line therapies for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, it also increased the incidence of adverse reactions, which cannot be ignored. Our study aims to explore the efficacy and safety of dual immunotherapies in advanced NSCLC.MethodsThis meta-analysis ultimately included nine first-line randomized controlled trials collected from PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases until 13 August 2022. Efficacy was measured as the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and risk ratio (RR) for the objective response rates (ORRs). Treatment safety was assessed by RR of any grade of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) and grade ≥ 3 TRAEs.ResultsOur results demonstrated that, compared to chemotherapy, dual immunotherapy shows durable benefits in OS (HR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.69-0.82) and PFS (HR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.67-0.83) across all levels of PD-L1 expression. Subgroup analysis also presented that dual immunotherapy resulted in improved long-term survival compared with chemotherapy in patients with a high tumor mutational burden (TMB) (OS: HR = 0.76, p = 0.0009; PFS: HR = 0.72, p < 0.0001) and squamous cell histology (OS: HR = 0.64, p < 0.00001; PFS: HR = 0.66, p < 0.001). However, compared with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy, dual immunotherapy shows some advantages in terms of OS and ORR and only improved PFS (HR = 0.77, p = 0.005) in PD-L1 < 25%. With regard to safety, there was no significant difference in any grade TRAEs (p = 0.05) and grade ≥ 3 TRAEs (p = 0.31) between the dual immunotherapy and chemotherapy groups. However, compared with ICI monotherapy, dual immunotherapy significantly increased the incidence of any grade TRAEs (p = 0.03) and grade ≥ 3 TRAEs (p < 0.0001).ConclusionsAs for the efficacy and safety outcome, compared with standard chemotherapy, dual immunotherapy remains an effective first-line therapy for patients with advanced NSCLC, especially for patients with high TMB levels and squamous cell histology. Furthermore, compared to single-agent immunotherapy, dual immunotherapy is only considered for use in patients with low PD-L1 expression in order to reduce the emergence of resistance to immunotherapy.Systematic Review Registation: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42022336614.

Project description:BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are increasingly used as first-line therapy for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring no actionable mutations; however, data on their efficacy among patients presenting with intracranial lesions are limited. This study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of ICIs combined with chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC patients with measurable brain metastasis at initial diagnosis.MethodsOur study retrospectively analyzed clinical data of a total of 211 patients diagnosed with driver gene mutation-negative advanced NSCLC with measurable, asymptomatic brain metastasis at baseline from Hunan Cancer Hospital between January 1, 2019 and September 30, 2021. The patients were stratified into two groups according to the first-line treatment regimen received: ICI combined with chemotherapy ( n = 102) or chemotherapy ( n = 109). Systemic and intracranial objective response rates (ORRs) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed. Adverse events were also compared between the groups.ResultsCompared with the chemotherapy-based regimen, the ICI-containing regimen was associated with a significantly higher intracranial (44.1% [45/102] vs . 28.4% [31/109], χ2 = 5.620, P = 0.013) and systemic (49.0% [50/102] vs . 33.9% [37/109], χ2 = 4.942, P = 0.019) ORRs and longer intracranial (11.0 months vs . 7.0 months, P <0.001) and systemic (9.0 months vs . 5.0 months, P <0.001) PFS. Multivariable analysis consistently revealed an independent association between receiving ICI plus platinum-based chemotherapy as a first-line regimen and prolonged intracranial PFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.37-0.73, P <0.001) and systemic PFS (HR = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.35-0.66, P <0.001). No unexpected serious adverse effects were observed.ConclusionOur study provides real-world clinical evidence that ICI combined with chemotherapy is a promising first-line treatment option for driver gene mutation-negative advanced NSCLC patients who present with brain metastasis at initial diagnosis.Clinical trial registrationhttps://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ , OMESIA, NCT05129202.

Project description:BackgroundAlthough immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) generally show poor therapeutic efficacy in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, certain research indicate that a small proportion of these patients do respond to ICIs. The present study sought to identify the features of patients with EGFR mutations who might benefit from ICIs from multiple studies and discussed the optimal treatment paradigm for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR mutations.MethodsThe profiles of 114 advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations who received ICIs treatment were retrospectively reviewed. EGFR subtypes, programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, and clinical characteristics regarding their impact on the efficacy of ICIs were investigated.ResultsPatients with major EGFR mutations (L858R or 19Del) had a shorter progression-free survival (PFS) and a lower objective response rate (ORR) as compared to patients with rare (20ins or G719X) and other EGFR mutations. Although not statistically significant, median overall survival (OS) tended to be longer in patients with negative (<1%) PD-L1 expression than with positive (≥1%) PD-L1 expression (15.61 vs. 7.40 months, p = 0.138). Median PFS and OS were significantly shorter in heavily treated patients (prior lines of therapy ≥3 lines vs. <3 lines: mPFS, 1.80 vs. 2.50 months, p = 0.003; mOS, 6.70 vs. 14.00 months, p = 0.031). ORR was also lower in patients who had received ≥3 prior lines of therapy compared to in those <3 prior lines of therapy (0.00% vs. 21.67%, p = 0.002).ConclusionPatients with major EGFR mutations showed poorer responses to ICIs than those with rare EGFR mutations. EGFR-mutated patients with lower PD-L1 expression showed a trend towards a longer OS after receiving ICIs. ICIs should be administered as early as possible to previously treated EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients. ICI-based combined therapies may be a direction for treatment of these patient subtypes in the future.

Dataset Information

Immunotherapy in Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients: Ushering Chemotherapy Through the Checkpoint Inhibitors?

Publications

Immunotherapy in Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients: Ushering Chemotherapy Through the Checkpoint Inhibitors?

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets