Dataset Information

Predicting Corticosteroid-Free Biologic Remission with Vedolizumab in Crohn's Disease.

ABSTRACT: Background and Aims:Vedolizumab (VDZ) is effective for Crohn's disease (CD) but costly and is slow to produce remission. Early knowledge of whether vedolizumab is likely to succeed is valuable for physicians, patients, and insurers. Methods:Phase 3 clinical trial data on VZD for CD were used to predict outcomes. Random forest modeling on the training cohort was used to predict the outcome of corticosteroid-free biologic remission at week 52 on the testing cohort. Models were constructed using baseline data, or data through week 6 of VDZ therapy. Results:The clinical trial included 594 subjects who received VDZ with baseline active inflammation [elevated C-reactive protein (>5 mg/L)]. Subjects with missing predictor variables (N = 120) or missing outcome data (N = 2) were excluded to produce a modeling dataset of 472 subjects. The Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AuROC) for corticosteroid-free biologic remission at week 52 using baseline data was only 0.65 (95% CI: 0.53 - 0.77), but was 0.75 (95% CI: 0.64 - 0.86) with data through week 6 of VDZ . Patients predicted to be in corticosteroid-free biologic remission at week 52 by the model achieved this endpoint 35.8% of the time, whereas patients predicted to fail only succeeded 6.7% of the time. Conclusions:An algorithm using laboratory data through week 6 of VDZ therapy was able to identify which CD patients with baseline inflammation would achieve corticosteroid-free biologic remission on VDZ at week 52. A majority of patients can be identified by week 6 as very unlikely to achieve remission.

SUBMITTER: Waljee AK

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6231370 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundCrohn's disease (CD) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease characterized by relapsing and remitting inflammation that leads to progressive bowel damage. Despite advances in medical treatment for CD, many patients require surgical intervention. Most studies of surgery rates are from patients treated with anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNFα) treatments, with comparatively little data on the surgery rates of patients treated with vedolizumab and ustekinumab. SOJOURN aimed to estimate the hazard rate and incidence of the first CD-related surgery following initiation of treatment with vedolizumab or ustekinumab in biologic-naïve patients with CD.MethodsSOJOURN was a retrospective, observational cohort study examining administrative claims data from the Optum® Research Database between July 1, 2017 and March 31, 2020. Included participants were adults with a diagnosis of CD and a claim for vedolizumab or ustekinumab (defined as the index treatment) between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2019, with no claims for a biologic in the 6 months before initiation of this treatment. The variable follow-up started on the day after the index date and continued until whichever came first of discontinuation of the index treatment, surgery event, switching of the index treatment, initiation of combination biologic treatment, disenrollment, or March 31, 2020. The time to the first CD-related surgery on biologic treatment was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. The hazard ratio and incidence rate ratio of CD-related surgery for each treatment cohort was compared using a Cox proportional hazards model and a Poisson regression model, respectively.ResultsOf the 1,122 included patients, 578 received vedolizumab and 544 received ustekinumab. After 1 year of the variable follow-up, 7.7% of patients receiving vedolizumab and 11.6% of patients receiving ustekinumab had undergone a CD-related surgery. Vedolizumab was associated with a 34.2% lower hazard rate of surgery (hazard ratio 0.658, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.436-0.994, p = 0.047) and a 34.5% lower incidence of surgery (rate ratio 0.655, 95% CI 0.434-0.988, p = 0.044) than ustekinumab.ConclusionsThis real-world analysis of biologic-naïve patients with CD suggests that vedolizumab is associated with greater effectiveness in reducing the rate of CD-related surgery than ustekinumab.

Project description:BackgroundVedolizumab is a biologic drug approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of adults with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) who have had inadequate response to, lost response to, or were intolerant of immunomodulators or tumor necrosis factor (TNF) blocker therapy, or who had an inadequate response with, were intolerant to, or demonstrated dependence on corticosteroid therapy. The biologics approved by the FDA for CD and/or UC include adalimumab, infliximab, golimumab, certolizumab, and ustekinumab.ObjectiveTo assess the budget impact of including vedolizumab in a health plan formulary among current options as a preferred first-line biologic therapy for UC and CD rather than only for patients who failed anti-TNF therapy.MethodsWe developed a 3-year budget impact model for a 1-million-member health plan. Comparators included all currently approved brand-name biologic and biosimilar agents for the treatment of UC (ie, adalimumab, infliximab, and golimumab) and CD (ie, adalimumab, certolizumab, infliximab, and ustekinumab). Clinical inputs included therapy response probabilities, disease remission, and surgery risk. Given the lack of head-to-head clinical trials, we estimated indirect comparisons of treatment efficacy based on clinical trial data using the Bucher method. The drug and medical costs were obtained from published literature. The model compared hypothetical health plan costs for 2 scenarios-(1) a market mix with vedolizumab included on the formulary with currently existing first- and second-line preferred treatments, and (2) vedolizumab included only with existing preferred second-line treatments on the hypothetical formulary. These scenarios were compared in the context of 3 hypothetical health plan formulary cases.ResultsIncluding vedolizumab in a hypothetical formulary with currently preferred first-line biologic treatment options (Scenario 1) resulted in cost-savings compared with vedolizumab as a preferred second-line biologic option (Scenario 2). The total cost-savings were from $0.13 million to $1.63 million in year 1, and from $0.38 million to $4.68 million in year 3. The per-member per-month cost-savings were from $0.01 to $0.14 in year 1 and from $0.03 to $0.39 in year 3.ConclusionBased on our model's results, including vedolizumab among the current health plan formulary biologic options as a preferred first-line treatment for UC and CD can result in substantial cost-savings compared with including vedolizumab as a preferred second-line treatment only.

Project description:BackgroundWe compared real-world healthcare resource utilization (HRU), Crohn's disease (CD)-related complications, and time to systemic corticosteroid discontinuation between patients with CD treated with adalimumab versus vedolizumab as initial biologic.MethodsBiologic-naïve adults with CD and ≥2 claims between 05/20/2014 and 09/30/2019 for adalimumab or vedolizumab were identified in the IBM MarketScan research database. Patient characteristics were assessed during the 6-month baseline period before biologic initiation (index date). Adalimumab- and vedolizumab-treated patients were propensity score-matched 1:1 on demographics, disease characteristics, and comorbidities with ≥10% prevalence that differed significantly between groups. Categorical, continuous, and time-to-event outcomes between groups during the 12-month follow-up on/after index were compared with chi-square tests, Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, and Kaplan-Meier analyses, respectively.ResultsAdalimumab- and vedolizumab-treated patients were matched (n = 461 per group) and baseline characteristics balanced. Significantly fewer adalimumab- versus vedolizumab-treated patients had a CD-related emergency room visit (12-month proportion: 14.5% vs 21.0%; log-rank P < 0.01) or inpatient admission (14.9% vs 20.2%; log-rank P < 0.05). Rates of CD-related surgeries were similar (9.3% vs 11.5%; log-rank P = 0.282). Among patients without internal/perianal abscess or fistula or intestinal stricture at baseline (N ADA = 360, N VDZ = 364), numerically but not significantly fewer adalimumab- versus vedolizumab-treated patients had CD-related complications at 12 months (18.3% vs 22.3%; P = 0.171). Among patients with corticosteroid use at index (N ADA = 143, N VDZ = 139), significantly more adalimumab- versus vedolizumab-treated patients discontinued corticosteroids (12-month proportion: 90.2% vs 76.3%; log-rank P < 0.001).ConclusionsPatients with CD treated with adalimumab as their first biologic experienced significantly lower CD-related HRU and were more likely to discontinue corticosteroids compared to vedolizumab-treated patients.

Dataset Information

Predicting Corticosteroid-Free Biologic Remission with Vedolizumab in Crohn's Disease.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets